College Professor Now Promoting Pedophilia, Says it’s Normal like other Sexualities <<MOD WARNING>>

False

 

Answer the question then, if you hear the phrase “she strips at that bar” does your mind go to a place where she takes off her jacket or where she gets nude for others enjoyment?

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/college-professor-now-promoting-pedophilia-says-it’s-normal-like-other-sexualities-mod-warning.567323/page-9#post-1071379756

http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/college-professor-now-promoting-pedophilia-says-it’s-normal-like-other-sexualities-mod-warning.567323/page-6#post-1071375633
http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/college-professor-now-promoting-pedophilia-says-it’s-normal-like-other-sexualities-mod-warning.567323/page-6#post-1071375708

Do you understand the difference between a woman stripping to elicit sexual excitement and a person in drag dancing while wearing a costume as a performance. Drag shows happen weekly in most gay bars, patrons always tip, it isn’t sexual.

No child was sexualized.
Gay rights organizations have nothing to do with pedophilia.
So again, Why would gay rights organizations even mention a child taking off their jacket?
Here is a list to help you since you seem confused: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LGBT_rights_organizations_in_the_United_States

Taking off what amounts to a a jacket is not a sexual act.

 

Me thinks you doth protest too much.

 

I think of removing clothes like when he took off his dress like the word stripping actually means. Do you just hate the dictionary?

LOL And you think that proves what exactly?

So you quoted me once again challenging you to back yourself and you don't. Thanks for making my argument once again.

If you had noticed I didn't post for 4 pages because I wasn't online and I've already answered that question in multiple posts as I will now prove once again.

Because this literature is being hosted on a pro LGBT site and this child stripping has been celebrated on the highest circulation of any LGBT monthly publication in the United States not to mention multiple others I linked to.

So this was already answered in 211, 216, 222 (and that's the short list) when you posted on the exact same subject.

So once again you are dead wrong and so easily disproven

Pro Tip: Your opinion is worthless on how sexual it is. The child took off his dress in full makeup on stage while grown men threw money at him at a gay bar. That's stripping no matter how you try and justify it. Nothing will change that.

Complete BS and you are the only one here arguing it isn't. A child stripping off their clothes in makeup dancing around a stage while men throw money at him is sexualized and you know it as does everyone else here.

If that were true then we wouldn't find any gay websites hosting the material in the OP. But we have.

Along with all the LGBT websites promoting a child who in full makeup strips on stage for adult men at a gay bar while having money thrown at him.

Its not a jacket its a dress. Stop fabricating facts. I even posting the video proving it.

Do you think asking the same question you've already been given an answer to over and over again will change reality in any way?

I'll just cut and paste again from my previous responses: Because its sexualizing children for the pleasure of full grown men at a gay bar.

A dress has never been a jacket in anywhere but your mind and gay websites hosting material on justifying child sex and the the highest circulation of any LGBT monthly publication in the United States not to mention multiple others I linked to celebrating a child stripping at a gay bar for money that grown men were throwing at him is sexualizing children and you are the only one here denying that reality.

Next time come up with some better questions than just the same ones over and over again if you can muster it.

 

No, I have people that intentionally use words to portray an emotionally false narrative. Why can't you answer the question?

It proves you lied when you said you never referred to it a cross dressing.

Again, why would a gay rights organization even address this?
it is irreligious to their mission seeking equality. Ignoring this question by issuing a half ass response doesn’t disprove anything.

Your opinion is just as worthless, opinions being what they are — opinion

Except it isn’t, I don’t care if 4 trillion people say it is sexual for a child to remove an outer garment while remaining fully clothed — it isn’t accurate.

jack·et
/ˈjakət/
noun

1. an outer garment extending either to the waist or the hips, typically having sleeves and a fastening down the front.

Fits the literal definition of a jacket... Since we are arguing exact definitions...

No child was sexualized

Where has anyone justified child sex. No child was sexualized.

 

Still defending degeneracy, noice. Meanwhile in Milwaukee, A SITTING JUDGE who was President the Cream City Foundation which sponsered Drag Queen Story hour has been arrested for child pornography.

Please regale us more about how this is all about diversity and inclusion and has nothing to do with powerful people trolling for children to molest.

The ONLY person on the planet surprised about this story is...... YOU. Why is that?

https://www.wisn.com/article/milwau...d-of-possession-of-child-pornography/35855215
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/milwaukee-brett-blomme-arrested-drag-queen-story-hour-sponsor

 

Pedophiles should be executed.

I fail to see how you are associating a judge that committed a crime that “sponsored” events with the individuals playing dress up and conflating the two.

Are you saying that the sponsors of events should be used to judge those events? Because if so we are probably going to need to shut down every organization on the planet.

Where did you arrive at your flawed conclusion that I am (or are not) surprised that there are pedophiles in positions of power?

 

The issue is Pedo's hiding in LGBTQ advocacy groups like he did.

 

They hide everywhere. There have been numerous Republican advocacy members and even large donors that have been found to be pedophiles. Does that say something about those Republican groups or does it only way something about groups you disagree with?

 

Republican is not a protected group.. You can be critical of Republicans ( see the mod warning on the first page)

You can be critical of Republicans.. In todays America you can not be critical of LGBTQQ@%$!% groups.

 

Strange, you are criticizing “LGBTQQ@%$!%” in several posts, even though it is not really warranted due to the actions of one person. Do you expect these posts to be deleted?
The mod warning likely exists because of attacks on gay people as a group, not due to criticism. If this thread would have been implying all Republicans are pedophiles it would have been deleted and the OP infracted but because it is against gay people it was not deleted but rather left up with a warning. Don’t play victim. It looks sad and pathetic.

I also do not see how anything you posted is relevant to my question. Let’s try again: Does that say something about those Republican groups or does it only way something about groups you disagree with?

 

Can you quote me being critical at an entire group like you claim.. I simply have fun with the never ending letters being added.

You dont like what i posted but it is relevant.

 

And you still didn’t answer the question.

Does that say something about those Republican groups or does it only way something about groups you disagree with?

 

Are you suggesting Pedo's hide in said groups thinking the Republican label would protect them?

If not we are not discussing the same thing.

 

So you are saying this judge, hid in an LGBT group because they would protect him?

Are you serious?

Or are you implying that gay people protect pedophiles?

I think you are confusing LGBT groups with religious ones.

 

I am saying this guy hid amongst Drag Queens yes..

Do you think of Drag Queens and LGBT as the same? I dont.

 

Um this dude was a judge in the Children's Division. Do I think he was protecting pedophiles, hell yes! He also has a husband and ADOPTED children. I have no doubt he molested the crap out of those kids. In fact, his husband is already under suspicion in my book.

https://www.wisn.com/article/mke-co...ties-cannot-have-contact-with-minors/35869573

 

Hey! He's just testing the waters for the acceptance of an "oppressed minority"...you know, that "defining deviancy down" thingy.....

 

How did he “hide” amongst Drag Queens?
The narrative you are pushing seems inconsistent, you know this person was just the president of an advocacy group — has already been terminated from the organization — and not an actual drag queen, yes? Did they attempt to hide him?

 

I am not asking what he did or didn’t do, my position on him has already been made clear, it has been said the LGBT group hid him or that he joined to garner some type of protection but none of you seem to be able to identify how that occurred. I have not seen any cases where he ruled on other cases involving pedophilia, can you post the case?

As for what you doubt, or suspect — what makes you suspect his husband? Do you frequently suspect the spouse when this is found in heterosexual households?

 

Wow you came up with 2 names there.