Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, May 25, 2011.
I think if Inside Job decides not to partake, that someone else should take his spot.
Based on his post history, I think it's quite reasonable to not expect Job to ever respond to this offer.
It's supposed to be shill free..right Jango?
Don't forget jobber free, also.
Long as we're shill free, we ought to be able to have a decent discussion. That's what I'm looking forward to.
Keeping the jobbers quiet will cut down on the derails (like 'chemtrails') that type always bring up.
Certainly should. Probably be able to focus one one point without having issue clouding interjections those kind always partake in.
Back to the issue (before some jobber tried to derail): has anyone presented the idea to NEwaIJ yet?
uh, you should know by now at this site thats impossible to do.
Not going to happen,go after someone else.The OCTA's here always resort to lies when they are cornered and cant refute facts.I am just here to try and wake people up like you that they have NO INTEREST in the truth and that your wasting your time with them.But i should not have to say that after all this time.you should know by now they do that all the time to try and save face when they are cornered and are just here to try and derail truth discussions. rule me out.find someone else.
You've lost the right to accuse anyone of ostrich behavior, though.
I gotcha, man, no problem. As I said, I've got nothing to gain from this. I was just asked to moderate, is all, which I obliged to. But now that you've backed away from the idea, I will do the same, for I do not think there is another participant available.
Why is it interesting?
Why do you want to know?
Because I'm an Aries! Wouldn't you be curious if the roles were reversed here?
I'm curious about lots of things.
So...tell me. Why the cold feet moderating?
Two reasons: For starters, Inside Job declined the invitation to join the debate. And secondly, I hypothesized that there would be no second debater to contend with.
Like I said...interesting. So much for the threat of honest discussion and the supposed players.
What is that supposed to mean?
What am I to do here? You tell me.
It was still being decided I thought?
I guess the control runs deeper than I originally thought, even a day ago.
I'm a private citizen. A disabled veteran. I make my own decisions; the other three-quarters are made for me by my wife! So when I saw that Inside Job was categorically rejecting the offer to debate against CJ, I made up my mind not to moderate a debate based off the reasons I already told you. I made those decisions independent of anyone, including my wife, knowing about it. I'm just a dude from Houghton Lake, Michigan.
Veteran that depends on his government pension by any chance? Just curious.
No, no government pension. I didn't serve long enough on active duty to qualify for any kind of benefits.
You were disabled in the service and you're on your own?? That sounds unusual.
Separate names with a comma.