You're overanalyzing this story. I'm not surprised, but I've laid out screenshots showing that her slick heels slid out from under her as he went to put her arm behind her back, thus causing her to fall forward and his arm grab on her acted as a boost. You're just acting dramatic because this was a cop. I'm more concerned with domestic violence when a man comes home and slaps his wife or GF around for not having supper cooked. That's the kind of scum that deserves to be beaten within an inch of his life.
Like the $6,400,000 immediately paid to Freddie Gray's family when the cops were acquitted afterall? They did nothing wrong, and his family got a stack that's probably already gone now, for nothing. That's the type of **** we shell money out for.
If he gets "in trouble" for something, than the actual reality is that the lines can be crossed... even by cops. Thats how Walter Scott's family ended up with millions, and a cop is facing murder charges. You need a reality check.
You realize he isn't just an actor,... but wrote the story, and produced it? A story where the most barbaric ways of police brutality gets justified? Police should not want to be associated to anything like that.
First of all the local government paid like 6 months after Freddie got killed. 2nd... even the head of the police admitted the cops did everything wrong. That's admitting the blame, hence the pay is totally justified.
My immediate reaction is that he went overboard, but I have no experience in law enforcement or any knowledge of what was going on. I'm assuming the incident is at least being investigated. I will say that it seems blatantly deliberate. I've been practicing Judo for 4 years, and I suck at it -- I've been hip thrown on a regular basis. Triggered!!!!!
And where's Walter Scott? 6 ft under. I know a cop will shot me in a second, for almost any reason. Feel free to get yourself blasted by the man in blue, I prefer to follow their commands and go about my life. That's reality. Lines and laws don't matter to a dead ****er, neither do settlements.
if the cops have a cop cam they are free to release it I am open to both sides of the issue, what we so so far seems excessive
Are you kidding me, I trip off you cats trying to justify a man who is suppose to uphold the law slamming a woman who was no threat to him face down into the concrete.
Irrelevant. Point is that the head of police says it's not right how it went.... where you claim it is. So we got 2 different opinions about the matter. You know what. I will take the head of police over yours.
Right, because he is suppose to SERVE and PROTECT. Any man that handles a woman in a unjustly manner falls into the same category.
No I haven't said it was right, I've said it's the way it is. Which I've said 15 different ways in this thread but morons keep confusing the two. If you get busted up resisting arrest, it's your fault. That doesn't mean excessive force wasn't used, it just mean you got served a bit of instant karma. Did this woman deserve to get her face smashed against the pavement? I could make a case either way. One thing's for sure I laugh every time I watch her eat it.
I've been talking about the moral and legal kind of view all along. Karma hit the career of the cop square in the nuts.
That is one of the Democratic Party's platform, Hilary Clinton promised to do so, and Democrat appointed Federal judges said this is required by the US Constitution.
