Court order calls for arrest of Queen Elizabeth II, Pope, PM Stephen Harper, et al.

Discussion in 'Civil Rights' started by Brother Jonathan, Dec 17, 2013.

  1. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The warrant exists and it is legal. I will grant you that Queen Elizabeth, and the others, may never have to face a criminal jury trial because they are so well protected, but they should stand trial for crimes against 50,000 orphans anyway.

    The International Court is a legal court of law handed down from the times of the Magna Carta. That is a fact.
    Common Law Grand Jury

     
  2. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh I am not denying there is a worthless piece of paper that you are calling a warrant. But it is most certainly not legal.
    .
    Whether they stand trial for alleged crimes has nothing to do with your fake warrant.
    .
    No,it isn't. It has no power or authority of any kind.
     
  3. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you believe that anyone should be able to kill 50,000 orphans with impunity?
     
  4. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Has nothing to do with your fake warrants and make believe court.
     
  5. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There is nothing fake about the people having the power to live lives of their own or overthrow underlying rulers. The power was given to the people in 1297 by the rulers of that day.
     
  6. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is as legal as if I held a grand jury with my daughter's stuffed animals and announced a unanimous vote for conviction.
     
  7. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fake warrant and make believe court. No legal power what so ever.
     
  8. Indofred

    Indofred Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,103
    Likes Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    83
    I'll translate.

    No, the 21st century is a new world. It is a world of drug fuelled warped minds . The court is a world court, staffed by wankers. The International Common Law Court of Justice, full of idiot commies.
     
  9. Indofred

    Indofred Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,103
    Likes Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    83
    MCCXCVII was an interesting year.
    King John, who signed that historic document, was dead.
    You're mistaking the version on the statute books for the original.
    And, power wasn't given to the people, only the very rich ones.
     
  10. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am not mistaking anything for anything. The people living have a right to live their lives. They don't need a ruler with weapons to tell them how to live their lives. They only a set of rules for peace and a ruler who will enforce the rules. The Bush family brought us into the 21st with 9/11 ... the same ole same ole war economy of last century. Killing people pays big bucks. "War Is A Racket" - Major General Smedley Butler USMC. Until now the criminals have gotten away with mass murder. Around 250 million innocent people died at the hands of these mass murders (Kings & Queens of the world) in the 20th century. They are trying to keep it up in the 21st century and a lot of us are saying, "No more killing people for profit"
     
  11. taikoo

    taikoo Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2012
    Messages:
    7,656
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You'd change your tune about who has standing to do what if someone invented a court that
    declared you were a criminal.
     
  12. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No I wouldn't. I haven't kidnapped or killed anyone and have not been accused as such. The Queen has been accused of killing 50,000 orphans, if she is innocent, will be allowed to go free. If she is guilty then she should be stopped before she kills more.
     
  13. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Seems they haven't been able to arrest any of their suspects, huh? Dratted impotence.
     
  14. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The people in charge, who have been accused of mass murder, also have their finger on the nuclear weapons. It is wise to be patient because if they think they can get away with mass murder, then they might not hesitate to just blow-up the Earth.
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Queen Elizabeth has her finger on nuclear weapons? Lol

    Cowards.
     
  16. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
  17. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
  18. Indofred

    Indofred Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    3,103
    Likes Received:
    315
    Trophy Points:
    83
    You did.
    The 'bill of rights' in question was signed a lot earlier than the version still in English law (well, bits of it are) and gave rights to a very small number of very rich landowners, not the general population.
    They only got that because they had the combined power to topple John.

    As for war being a racket, of course it is but most people think the latest lot is about defending Israel or oil.
    These people are wrong.
    Take a look at American invasions, attacks and so on from 1945 onwards.
    Politics and keeping the world free of communism was the usual excuse but that wasn't the real reason.
    Moving along to the collapse of the Berlin wall and we suddenly found the evil Muslim threat.
    Most people think oil was the motivation but they were wrong, that was just a bonus.
    Now the Muslim threat is being played out, the Chinese are in the frame and we're starting to see more and more anti Chinese stories appear.
    Israel, America's great friend is always in the news but why the massive support when they've caused so much grief for America?
    Easy enough - Israel keeps a military advantage in that region so, every time America gives aid (military kit) to Egypt, it gives the same plus some to Israel.
    The American tax payer gives billions in aid (weapons) to all sides but always maintains an Israeli advantage so war is less likely, thus keeping arms sales running. If that advantage wasn't there, Israeli would be gone and the arms sales with it.
    Clever, aren't they?

    Now, take away all your ideas and insert, "American foreign policy is dictated by the American arms industry".
    Try that with any and every American military action since 1945 and see if it fits.

    Every time an enemy is defeated or defeats itself, a new evil enemy, intent on destroying the United states appears, just in time to stop military cutbacks and lesser arms sales.
     
  19. Fugazi

    Fugazi New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2012
    Messages:
    17,057
    Likes Received:
    96
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All but three of the Magna Carta clauses are no longer law in the UK, the three that remain are as follows;

    One defends the freedom and rights of the English church, another confirms the liberties and customs of London and other towns, but the third is the most famous:

    No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled . nor will we proceed with force against him . except by the lawful judgement of his equals or by the law of the land. To no one will we sell, to no one deny or delay right or justice.


    http://www.bl.uk/treasures/magnacarta/basics/basics.html
     

Share This Page