D.O.J Cuts Off All Negotiations With Sheriff Arpaio. (Why? His Obama Investigation?)

Forum4PoliticsBot · Apr 10, 2012

Could that really be the reason? The fact that his Maricopa County Sheriffs Department investigation into Obama found him (Obama) to have 2 forged documents, a abstract long form birth certificate and selective service registration card pica date stamp? I believe that would be the reason. The Selective Service sent Arpaio a letter last week refusing to let Arpaios team see Obama's original. I think this is payback by Obama and Holder. I do find Sheriff Arpaio to be a outstanding law officer. He has 50 years experience in both federal law enforcement and local county law enforcement. Thats a hell of a resume. I think Arpaio will turn up the heat on Obama in his investigation of his eligibility after this move by the Obama Administrations Dept of Justice.

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/

Thread started at Forum 4 Politics on 04-03-2012 05:44 PM

Really People? · Apr 12, 2012

I suspect the main reason for any problem Arpaio has is that he's a moron...

And, sorry, but, there were no forged documents found...

Lol...

waltky · Jun 26, 2012

Granny says, "Dat's right Sheriff Joe - stand yer ground...

Sheriff Joe Arpaio 'not going to bend' to Obama
6/25/12 - 'It’s going to be very interesting to see what the Homeland Security does now,' said Arpaio.

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio on Monday accused President Barack Obama of trying to make him the “poster boy” of his state’s controversial immigration law and maintained that he’s “not going to bend to the federal government” in light of the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down parts of the law. Asked by Fox News’ Neil Cavuto whether he considered Obama’s statement that “no American should ever live under a cloud of suspicion just because of what they look like” was intended to be a “slap” at Arpaio, the sheriff responded, “Of course it is.” “I’m the poster boy. He mentioned me a few months ago at the White House; he didn’t like what I was doing with [S.B.] 1070,” he said. “I’m going to continue to enforce those state laws, regardless of what the federal government is trying to put pressure on me to satisfy all these activists, which by the way are in front of my building right now, three-and-a-half years they’ve been in front of my building. So, I’m not going to bend to the federal government, especially when we still have state laws to enforce.”

The Supreme Court’s highly anticipated decision ruled against three provisions of SB 1070 while upholding one — widely known as the “show me your papers” measure — that requires police officers to determine the immigration status of an individual who has been stopped for questioning when there’s reasonable suspicion that the person is in the country illegally. The Justice Department announced in May that it is suing the Arpaio, who calls himself the “toughest sheriff in America.” On Fox, the Maricopa County sheriff also took a shot at the administration’s immigration policy. “If he has that much concern, then stop them from coming into the United States because it’s illegal to come into this country,” he said. “He ought to do something about that situation.”

Earlier in the day, the sheriff had said that the Supreme Court had protected “a good section” of the state’s immigration law by upholding the controversial “show me your papers” provision of the law. “I think this is a good section that’s been upheld,” Arpaio said Arizona’s local TV station KNXV. “I would have liked to see where we would have the authority to arrest illegal aliens just by being here illegally and book them into our jails, but that’s not going to happen. But I think this sends a message that we will be involved in enforcing the illegal alien laws and our police officers will be able to at least try to determine if they’re in this country illegally.”

Arpaio also pushed back on allegations that he is a proponent of racial profiling, maintaining that he’s simply interested in doing “the right thing.” Asked if he expects Immigration and Customs Enforcement to cooperate with the sheriff’s department, Arpaio said this remains to be seen. “It’s going to be very interesting to see what the Homeland Security does now, if they will continue to pick up the illegal aliens we come into contact with,” he said. “So we’ll see what happens.”

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0612/77792.html
Click to expand...

See also:

In Arizona law's wake, other states to forge ahead
25 June`12 WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court's split ruling Monday on Arizona's controversial immigration law did nothing to settle the debate — providing little clarity on how far states can go to police their borders and solidifying the topic as a key election-year issue.

The court, in Arizona v. United States, upheld a key provision that requires state and local police to check the immigration status of people they've stopped or detained if a "reasonable suspicion" exists that they're in the country illegally. Though this pillar of the law survived the federal government's challenge, the courts are likely to see it again once it is fully implemented. The justices, in a 5-3 vote, struck down three other provisions that created new state crimes targeting illegal immigrants, arguing that Arizona had usurped federal authority in the area of immigration enforcement.

The court battle pitted Arizona's Republican Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed the immigration bill into law two years ago, against President Obama, whose Justice Department sued the state to block it. Both Brewer and Obama claimed victory, suggesting just how difficult it will be to reach a consensus on how local police can approach, question and arrest the country's 11 million illegal immigrants. "The Supreme Court has really sent us a mixed message," said Arizona state Sen. Steve Gallardo, a Democrat and opponent of the bill.

Brewer said the "heart of the bill" was upheld, and state legislators around the country sounded emboldened, arguing that the ruling will not only help similar laws survive constitutional challenges but will lead to more laws when state legislatures reconvene in January. Janet Murguia, president of the National Council of La Raza, a Hispanic civil rights group, said the court upheld the "heart of the problem." But activists held out hope that because the majority of the law was gutted, similar laws across the country — or those under consideration — will suffer a similar fate.

As other states targeting illegal immigration sort out the legal fallout from the ruling, the decision swiftly moved into the political realm as Obama and presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney weighed in. The president said he remained "concerned about the practical impact of the remaining provision" and that it could open the door for racial profiling. In fact, Obama's Department of Justice announced late Monday that it had set up a telephone hotline and e-mail address to field reports of civil right complaints when the law goes into effect, which will happen after a federal injunction is lifted. Romney said the ruling underscores how Obama has failed to develop a national immigration strategy that does not force states to fend for themselves: "This represents yet another broken promise by the president."

MORE
Click to expand...

Mr_Truth · Jun 27, 2012

Really People? said: ↑

I suspect the main reason for any problem Arpaio has is that he's a moron...

And, sorry, but, there were no forged documents found...

Lol...
Click to expand...

I kept asking the forum right wingers for their ''proof'' of a forged document but none offered any.

No surprise.

gamewell45 · Jun 27, 2012

I don't think Arpaio is dealing with a full deck. The man lost it years ago. He should have retired and stayed out of law enforcement when he was still respected.

Log in or Sign up

D.O.J Cuts Off All Negotiations With Sheriff Arpaio. (Why? His Obama Investigation?)

Forum4PoliticsBot New Member

Really People? New Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

D.O.J Cuts Off All Negotiations With Sheriff Arpaio. (Why? His Obama Investigation?)

Forum4PoliticsBot New Member

Really People? New Member

waltky Well-Known Member

Mr_Truth Well-Known Member

gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

Share This Page

Useful Searches