There is no mistaking smugness when it rears it's head.Both the New York Times and Washington Post are great examples.They live to act tickled pink in their cavalier acts of " fake news " personified.They are Liberals,assurededly and also Vote democrat.They share the same traits.They Cheat.They Lie. They castigate and blame those who don't cotton their Point of View. The most current example of this smarmy trait is the latest reveleations of the murder of DNC staffer ... Seth Rich.Who hooked up with WikiLeaks and leaked 44,ooo DNC E-mails.I doubt he was on the Kremlins payroll. Julian Assuange also offered a $25,ooo reward for Info that uncovered who or how Rich was murdered { shot in the back when going home after a few rounds at a bar in Washington }. The story is non-existent at The Newsrags of record { N.Y.Times and WAPO }. That is Proof positive of the collusion between the Democrat Party and those newsrags.They are in collusion to cover each other's acts.To back each other. Which also means to Ignore things.Like Fast & Furious. Like Interviewing and taking Obama to task when he LIED about Benghazi. Or even when Obama LIED about his Iran for Prisoner Ransom. This is how Smugness works. Just so you know. Don't say you've never been told. Between Smugness and Obama's Glibness,this country is in daily peril.
Liberals and Democrats alike suffer complete lack of perspective and manners.They are like wood that has the beginnings of dry rot. Do they care.They do not.Do they try and fix their own broken party.They don't. Therefore the mission to destroy our Electorate.To contaminate it. Like with Open borders and No Voter ID laws. To turn it into a Mini Cuba or Banana Republic.That was what Obama's and Hillary's mission was.To render the rule of law,inconsequential and beneath scrutiny. Therefore the irrational justification for Obama's Right hand man { Valerie Jarrett } to publically proclaim Obama never suffered any Scandals. Which of course merely juxtaposed the seriousness of a lapdog Mainstream Media.
Private Investigator Red Wheeler: "...I have not found one shred of evidence at all, that indicates that Seth's death is the result of any Russian hacking or anything like that. I do think its possible, and I underline the word possible, that it could have been related to his job to some degree, or relationships to his job..." Dick Cheney: "It's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague, that he did meet with a senior official of Iraqi Intelligence." Dick Cheney: "No I never said that...I never said that." Dick Cheney: "It's been pretty well confirmed that he did go to Prague, that he did meet with a senior official of Iraqi Intelligence." THEN NOW
Yet, ignoring things like "Operation Wide Receiver" under George W. Bush, back in 2006, is acceptable: https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli.../gIQAuRHIRL_story.html?utm_term=.bf304609b747. News organizations throughout the entire region were ALL reporting the exact same thing. That there was a previous attack that had already taken place in Libya, earlier that same day and that the second attack on the US Compound was an continuation of that same thing and in direct response to the "Video." Even in the third (3rd) video posted here, you can decipher that they are talking about a "Video" or a "Film." You clearly hear them using those words even though they are not speaking English. Susan Rice, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, were not on the ground in Benghazi. They were watching the exact same local and regional news that I was watching on that day and in the days following. In those local and regional news reports, it was WIDELY claimed by everyone in the region what the cause of the attacks were. In one of the videos here, you even see a a man standing mere yards from the Compound after it had been attacked and he is CLEARLY telling you the REASON for the attack. How is it that this man standing in Benghazi mere yards away from the compound itself after the attack is claiming the "Video" about "Muhammad" to be the reason, yet Faux News back here in the UNITED STATES got the report dead wrong? Fox News, placed a GREEN SCREEN behind one of its reporters claiming that they were reporting from Libya. We know that it was a GREEN SCREEN because they had used that same GREEN SCREEN previously when claiming that Fox News had an "inside source at the Pentagon" who knew that the attacks were staged and not related to the video. If Fox News had that kind of information, why did Fox News not inform the White House, or reveal its "inside source at the Pentagon" and what it knew about a pending attack that had not yet taken place? Furthermore, the real Fake News in Benghazi, was the obsession by Fox News to label the attacks a "Terrorist Attack." That term was buried in the psyche of America by the False Flag 911 operation that Neocons called their "New Pearl Harbor." Was it not George W. Bush, himself that repeated over and over again: "Either you are with us, or you are with the Terrorists." Is that not what you defined as one of the characteristic traits of Liars? Wake up.
