Democrat Ilhan Omar wins Minnesota House race

You're entire post is garbage.
The religion Christians created was not the bloodiest.
The religion itself is fairly peaceful.

What the people in charge did with it, was bloody, and could not be done again,
Because now people have bibles and can read.

Regarding Islam, I didn't write the religion.
It states in the hadiths "Islam cannot change."
There are over 100 sects, most killing each other, over stupid differences.

 

The claims of the founders in my previous post are not garbage .. and you standing on a soap box crying "Garbage Garbage" giving no support for your silly claim, does not make it so.

Christianity after Constantine was indeed a bloody affair. Your claim that it was peaceful is abject nonsense and/or historical revisionism.

 

Don't make up what I said.
People under the banner of Christianity murdered all over the world.
It seems you don't know anything about the religion though.
The religion itself is not violent.
In fact, post some examples, I think there are only two verses in Christianity that can even be bent into violence.

 

I know far more about the Christian religion than you do and you are obfuscating and building another straw man.

This is not about what a book says (and we have already covered the fact that the Book says some nasty things so you are circling back to your own vomit in a fallacious fit of denial) ... this is about the beliefs of the individual adherents to a religion and the actions of those adherents.

If Christians actually followed the teachings of Jesus a little better than they do you might have had a point but - they don't.

 

Total Bullsh-t, even backpedaling a little.
If you know so much about the Christian religion,
first, you wouldn't be making these ignorant statements
second, you could easily post the violence you are claiming.

The religion itself, is not violent.

many Christians are violent.
many thinking they are violent for the religion.

and it doesn't matter if Christians follow the teachings of Jesus.
That was not the point.

You are desperately trying to tell me the religion is violent...show me.
I can show you in Islam, but not Christianity.

 

I DIRECTLY addressed the central premise of your argument and YOU are still full of **** UNTIL you copy and paste my words that make any assertion about "all muslims"

 

Actually, Christians not following the teaching of Jesus was a part of his point. Christians wreak violence all over the world in contradiction of their doctrine while Muslims wreak violence all over the world according to their doctrine.

 

Care to cite a single example from the first couple hundred years of its invention that shows this violence? Within 80 years of Muhammads death the muslims were waging violent jihad in Spain to the west and Afghanistan to the east to expand the empire of Islam. Christianity spread from Israel to encircling the entire Mediterranean sea, purely by word of mouth, persecuted every step of the way by the governing authorities.

 

Correct. Now explain how this relates to difference between a Muslim who is Islamist and one that is not.

 

What a joke of a post - first you build this nonsensical measuring stick ( years after the Prophet was born) - then you talk about how these religions spread.

What does any of this have to do with the difference between a Muslim who is Islamist and one who is not.

 

Islamist and moderate are meaningless terms invented by the west.


Kind of like comparing 2, KKK members.
One lynches blacks
The other just beats them up.

 

The term Islamist is not meaningless .. and I have given you the definition numerous times.

"Moderate" as used by the Obama Administration in relation to the Syrian Rebels - was pure propaganda.

The world would be a better place if everyone knew and understood the difference between a Muslim who is an Islamist and one who is not.

 

Actually what other people know would have little effect, especially since it changes so often.
It would be better if the Muslims knew.
The term may not be, but the application is meaningless.

Especially since they have orders to lie to the kaffir anyways.

 

The application is not meaningless. The application is everything. Prior to applying a term properly you first need to understand what that term means. The problem is that people do not have a good understanding of the concepts I have been trotting out ad nauseam ... concepts you either do not understand or desperately want to ignore.

It is not about Muslim's knowing what an Islamist is - the best arguments against Islamist's are coming from Muslims. The western media is afraid to use the term and has done everything in its power not to educate people on the definition of this term - its proper application - and on the difference between a Muslim who is an Islamist and one who is not.

 

Look, you already blew it with your grasp on Christianity, and now you are trying Islam.

How do you tell the difference, do you ask them.

 

An Islamist adheres to the doctrine.

 

It was a question you couldn't provide the answer to.

 

Correct but you did not link your comments to this.

 

What question was I not able to provide the answer to ??

 

Some folks get themselves in a tizzy when Americans engage in democracy and choose their representatives in the democratic process.

The increasing diversity of the populace will be reflected in whom Americans elect.

There will be more women (51% of the population) in elected office as they become more politically engaged.

 

And these same people seem not to be overly concerned about having a criminal president. They worry about an elected representative being a Muslim and don't even give her a chance, but simply prejudge her, but then refuse to condemn a politician on their team who clearly deserves condemnation for his words and deeds. They even insist that those who do condemn him aren't doing so out of any legitimate concern, but are just being "NPCs." Yet, again, these are the people who have NPC reactions to Muslims.

 

Excellent post.

 

This is true, but the same thing applies if she is wearing a KKK costume.
and the doctrine of the KKK is not as bad as Islam.

But hey, some KKK members are fine people.

 

politically correct members of the far right often think so

 

I don't think there is a political group for an accurate evaluation.
I think you would have to know them personally.