Does quantitative easing really work?

liberals have a high percentage of high income folks who are in effect volunteering to pay for liberal programs when they vote for them. Sorry you have failed to make your case.

 

You mean a high percentage of educated folks

 

yes high income and education voters who vote liberal and thus volunteer to pay for their crippling idiotic programs.

 

So educated people support idiocy? Why do you think that is?

 

educated people supported Hitler. So????????

 

Your Hitler fascination is noted, but please answer my question. Why do you think educated people are more likely to support liberalism?

 

What's a high percentage of high income individuals? And what's a high income?

 

Those educated liberals would know...

 

Nobody is crying for free primary education. It already exists. Total silliness for you to bring that up.

Universal health care is single payer, meant for everyone.

Are you really that dense or do you just play one on the debate forums?

 

wrong of course Republicans are clamoring for vouchers and eventually privatization while liberals are clamoring for continued private education from which children benefit, not liberals as you mistakenly claimed.

 

yes meant for everyone and paid for by everyone. And??????? Do you know what your point is?

 

who cares? you said liberals vote for liberal programs to get their hands on benefits when they have a huge % of upper class voters who will more pay for the benefits than receive them. Do you understand?

 

because they really aren't educated. Its like asking why did most scientists at one time think the earth was the center of the universe.

 

If the majority of liberals were high income ersners, liberals would never win elections, and presidential election wouldn't be nearly 50/50. Elections are decided by the individuals representing the majorities of the populations, the middle and working classes.
If you're going to have a premise for an argument, at least think it through, and do a little math. Friggin embarrassing

 

Free primary education exists and it ain't going anywhere.. Period.
The calls for free education are now targeting upper education.
Your arguments get more ridiculous with every key stroke.

 

Paid for progressively, through the existing tax codes which subsidizes everyone paying below the highest rates. Every penny one gets subsidized is free to them. What part of that is difficult?

 

Do you think you're more educated than the educated?

 

how can I be more educated than the educated when I'm educated? Notice you have time to waste on gibberish because you known you have no logical argument to support libcommieism.

 

agreed so?? you said liberals vote liberal to get money as if the rich don't vote liberal to give money ??

 

The majority voting liberal are in the middle and working classes, cuz that's where the majority of people are. This is not difficult.

 

The majority of any voting base is middle and working class

 

A silly question reflecting your ludicrous claims. You've made the ignorant claim that educated people are not actually educated. I've merely asked fornyour credentials in deciding the 'wrong type of education'

 

you know you have no logical argument to support libcommieism.

 

yes so they subvert our democracy by voting for money in their pockets rather the commonweal, but so does much of the upper class that creates the crippling welfare programs and pays for them.

 

Ideas come from the Ivy League where supposedly our best and brightest work. They really create the choices in our elections.