Does reversing abortion laws give all non-white Americans a better socio-economic demographic positi

Does reversing abortion laws give all non-white Americans a better socio-economic demographic position?

Statistically, more non-whites are aborted than whites.

Reverse this trend and the shrinking white demographic dominance goes into overdrive.

White is demographically shooting itself in the foot.

White power, at this point in time, is being quite generous to non-whites.

One might see it all as a huge white restitution and reparations to all those non-whites we white predators stressed.

Are white Americans who are on the right, aware of what they are giving up, demographically speaking?

Should the non-white Americans be on the right wing side on this, just for the benefits of fast tracking their control?

Regards
DL

 

It appears you think the supreme court decision ended or hampered the practice of abortion. It did not. It moved responsibility for it to the states.

 

Don't care about skin color. Human's have a Right to life.

 

Whites were predicted to no longer be the majority by 2045 and some analysts has said forcing women to birth will push this figure up by as many as 3 years.




I hope they are treated just as well as they have treated minorities.

 

The problem with your logic is that abortion only increased single head of households.

Being single is a leading indicator to be poor.

 

Gotta love the insinuation there.

 

I have been assured that there is no racism in this nation against minorities and no one is trying to take their rights.

With what is going on with our education system and political system plus this — I am just ecstatic I have dual citizenship. Y’all will be fine though!

 

The draconian, retrogressive laws passed and enforced by authoritarian politicians that abrogate the freedom American women have enjoyed for half-a-century bring the backward states in line with Iraq, El Salvador and Nicaragua, and will inflict an additional burden on poor women, of course, in their access to reproductive health services.

Being forced to incubate until a child has developed and is born inflicts an unsustainable burden on poor women, especially in states that provide little support.

The more affluent will have alternatives to avoid statist oppression.

However, the poor are not the only victims. E.g.,

Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, told the Indianapolis Star that just three days after the federal right to an abortion was reversed she received a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio, who needed her help. The physician had a pregnant patient, a 10-year-old, who could no longer legally undergo the procedure in her home state.

In Indiana, for now at least, abortion is legal up to 22 weeks after a pregnant person's last menstrual cycle. However, Indiana politicians have scheduled a special legislative session later this month to address abortion laws. Republican lawmakers, who hold a supermajority in the state, indicate they intend to further restrict the procedure.

Despite the influx of patients seeking care across state lines, with abortion access likely to be restricted in Indiana, Bernard's ability to help those seeking the procedure in the future is uncertain.

"It's hard to imagine that in just a few short weeks we will have no ability to provide that care," Bernard, who agreed to help the 10-year-old patient, told the Indianapolis Star.

https://news.yahoo.com/10-old-forced-cross-state-014401194.html​

 

The real driver of abortion is not race but poverty

You want to reduce abortion? Start with paid maternity leave

 

Then why does God kill so many before they are born?

 

Sheer malice.

 

Not once have I evoked any sort of spiritual argument. All my arguments have been based on facts, logic and actual Rights held. Yet this is all that you can fall back on? Like I said. You have no argument to counter with.

 

I was making a very valid point that there is a massive natural attrition rate between fertilisation and birth

https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2005/05/implications-defining-when-woman-pregnant

 

You might consider yourself a white predator but no one not consumed with white guilt, feels that way.

Unless you're personally doing something to minorities in which case I would recommend that you evaluate your own actions and reconsider

 

I'm assuming you're white so does this include you also?

 

If everyone is equal, why does it matter which "precious little lives" are saved?

Why are you capitalizing "White"? Please stop butchering our language.

 

All of these boat companies that are offering to now pay to send their employees wherever they need to go to get an abortion are doing it because it's cheaper than maternity leave and also to virtue signal

 

I have duel citizenship with Scotland and can migrate to pretty much anywhere in Europe. In 2045 I will be 50 so I am likely to still be around — just not in the states.

 

I'm not sure who's capitalizing white.... But have you noticed that Google loves to capitalize black?

 

So what you're saying is is that you're glad that white people will be treated illy but you're glad you won't be here to see it because maybe then you can give your opinion from Scotland and exacerbate the situation? Much like you're already doing

 

I don't see why it would have any effect on that whatsoever. Reversing the decision simply means that the federal government is stepping back. It just turns over that power to decide these things to the states. In many states nothing will change.

 

At least someone is doing SOMETHING. There is an easy counter to that

Legalise paid maternity leave - enforce companies to provide it and legislate to prevent them from firing pregnant employees

Either that or make paid maternity leave government sponsored

It is the difference between sitting around and grizzling about things and actually finding workable solutions

 

Does it? Show me that

Oops - edit - just found out!

 

I think you misspelled legislate paid maternity leave.

I don't know of anyone who's getting fired for being pregnant.

But I do know of an employee who got unpaid maternity leave. And she was welcome back to work after that. Then she quit several months later anyway.

I love how you guys have all of these Grand ideas especially from overseas.... But what you never really include is where the money is supposed to come from?

 

Uh huh, sure.... this is you back tracking when you realized that trying to pin this as me being religious didn't work.

And your point in this post is meritless. I've stated my stance. Trying to put other peoples stances as being, at least in part, as mine is irrelevant to my argument. Which is simple.

Fact: A ZEF has unique, distinct DNA.
Fact: That DNA is human DNA.
Fact: A ZEF is biologically a life form.

Put it all together and it shows that a ZEF is a distinct human life.