Don Lemon: “We have to stop demonizing people.....the biggest terror threat is White males”

No factual as i have debunked snopes plenty and hell used left wing sources to do it.. They are famous for looking at claim and calling to "false" because according to their research they could find nothing to back it up.. Meanwhile a few minutes on any search engine would show they are not right.. They are so ****ing biased they barely look they just assume based on their bias.

When i have pointed this out with left wing sources i was smeared to hell and back.. It was damn funny.

 

At 1st christians and jews were to be allowed. That, I think, was one of the problems with his early versions.
Again, all the kept him from implementing a full muslim ban, is THE Constitution. He tried to push it as close as possible to and as many muslims as he could.

 

Especially to some thug that draws a gubmint allowance! But it might matter to someone that works 50 hours a week and pays tax's that are used to by local gubmint to purchase and replace those buses the thugs burned, and a general form of transportation used by other low income families!

 

You can't answer the question. Just as I figured.

 

Not false at all. As I said, the constitution kept him from doing what he wanted to do.

 

Yes - lets
In 2017, 6444 of the 11883 murders where the race of the offender was known were black. That's 54.2%
What % of that 11883 were white men in mass shootings? Please round to the nearest tenth %
https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u....017/tables/expanded-homicide-data-table-3.xls

 

You keep claiming you have his intent with no citation and yet call it factual and yet when pressed you never back it up.

 

Lefties think everything is racist. Securing our borders is racist to them so I'm only interested in actual racism not the constant dog-whistles they keep hearing in their heads.

 

What have you debunked them with?

 

Links to articles with facts discussing the topic ( gasp)

 

Did you cherry pick more than one?

 

Of course I do. It took a few tries before what he was trying to accomplish to meet the constitutional requirements.
At 1st he was letting in non muslims from muslim countries with the ban. A no no.
If he had his way, and he said so in the campaign, he'd ban all muslims until there was a vetting process he agreed with.

 

You're wrong of course. You must only get your info from 24/7 fox reality tv. Which doesn't do well with reality either.

 

Of course I don't. Why are you making crap up about me?

 

Why not post the EO he presented regarding immigration from terrorist nations and put this debate to rest.

 

Has the furor (this word's phonetics make some tingly no doubt) over Lemon's truthful comments died down yet?

 

You cant link to anything can you.

 

You started it with making crap up about lefties. When one lumps everyone on a side into the same think group, that is a tell tale sign they get their info from false 24/7 BS reality tv.

 

BRODY: "Persecuted Christians, we've talked about this, the refugees overseas. The refugee program, or the refugee changes you're looking to make. As it relates to persecuted Christians, do you see them as kind of a priority here?"

TRUMP: "Yes."
https://www.npr.org/2017/01/29/5123...ians-isis-and-vetting-miss-the-bigger-picture

 

Don't always be so lazy.

The rulings were a second major setback for Mr. Trump in his pursuit of a policy that he has trumpeted as critical for national security. His first attempt to sharply limit travel from a handful of predominantly Muslim countries ended in a courtroom fiasco last month, when a federal court in Seattle halted it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/us/politics/trump-travel-ban.html

 

Yet another lie, prove it.

 

Oh bullcrap. I guess if you can't discuss the topic then attack the person. You don't believe that lefties way over-use the race card? Seriously?

 

No bull crap. You typed it, I requoted your post.
You ended the debate as far as I'm concerned with Lefties, everything, blah blah blah.

 

Keep reading. And put some salt on that crow.

 

Your inability to defend your claim is noted.