Dr Don Easterbrook Exposes Climate Change Hoax

Heat and temperature are related to each other but are different concepts.

Heat is the measure of energy. When we add heat, the temperature will become higher. If we remove heat the temperature will become lower.

 

This just proves temperature is a way to measure heat. That is why my cookies bake at the prescribed temperature and my French fries are cooked at 350 f....usually.

 

Heat is measured in joules.

 

Okay, tell that to my oven. Or my freezer for that matter. Or my plants die at 32 f. or 0C.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joule Joules is a measurement of work.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature now let's look at temperature.

 

No, I've pointed out that it's a dishonest cherrypicking fallacy on your part to only use the data that supports your claims.

Honest people talk about the whole world. Dishonest people talk about their back yard, because the data for the globe contradicts them.

As shown by the temperature record across the world.

And back you go to failing at cause and effect. Longer growing seasons are a _result_ of a temperature change, not a _cause_. You're just hopelessly inept at this.

You have nothing but your dishonest cherrypicking and your bug-eyed red-faced frothing cult fanaticism.

I've already mentioned that if you want me to spend hours tutoring someone who is as lazy and hostile to knowledge as you are, you'll need to pay me ahead of time. Your lack of knowledge about the basics is your problem, so it's up to you to remedy it.

In order to pull off the condescending act, you have to actually be smart. You can't be a cult babbler. That's why I can do it, and you can't. You've demonstrated staggering ineptness across the board. You've failed completely at logic, statistics, physics, everything. On the bright side, at least you're a well-rounded failure, and at least you're useful in one way -- if you say something, it's fairly safe to assume the exact opposite is true.

 

Educate yourself.

https://judithcurry.com/2014/07/07/understanding-adjustments-to-temperature-data/

 

Lmfao you are using Judith Curry who the AGW cult claims is part of the deniers ?

Well this post of yours tells me a lot..


.

 

No, no, no. Evaporation cools wherever it happens. That's one reason why deserts get so hot in the day, no evaporative cooling. Moist soil cools the air when the moisture evaporates. Plants cool the air when they transpire water into the atmosphere.

Get stuffed, liar.

You only do two things here.

You fail completely at even the most basic science, logic and statistics.

You constantly lie about what anyone else says.

As those two points have been well proven, there's no longer any reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will lie in response to anything anyone says to you.

 

It should tell you that even Judith Curry thinks your fundamental conspiracy theory is kooky.

That's specifically why I used that reference.

 

No it tells me you respect the hell out of her....and couldn't find any other reference.


.

 

As my 7th grade science teacher taught us...."evaporation is a cooling process".

 

But we are *NOT* having higher temps. My data doesn't show that. Measurements in Iowa show fewer record high temps being set for each of the past five years, meaning high temps are going *down*, not up. Exactly what my data for Kansas shows. A consistent downward trend in the number of days of 100degF or over for the past five years.

I know it's hard for math illiterates to understand how the mean can go up while temperatures are not. Maybe if you think about it long enough you will understand.

 

GO AWAY TROLL!

You can't even quote me correctly!

 

But *differentials* in the mean are *NOT* a measure of temperature.

Your math illiteracy is showing again!

You still haven't provided any evidence to show whether the mean is going up due to higher temps or due to longer growing seasons.

 

Why do you interrupt in the thread when you have nothing of import to offer except a complete lack of knowledge of the difference between heat and temperature?

 

Temperature is a measure of MASS and ENERGY, energy measured in joules!

It's why a cup of water and a gallon of water both boil at 100degC but it takes many more joules to heat a gallon of water to the boiling point than it does a cup of water.

 

But how much energy is required to move the temperature a certain amount is a function of mass.

 

A change in temperature tells you nothing about the energy required to effect the change.

A lot more energy is required to heat a gallon of water to boiling than a cup of water. Mass is a part of the equation!

 

But *you* don't know about the whole world. You only know the AGW bible. When the mean goes up it implies temperatures went up. But it doesn't have to imply that at all. And, in your religious ferver you can't accept any other explanation regardless of what the data actually says.

WHAT temperature record? You have yet to reference any source or graph that shows actual temps, only temperature differentials in the mean!

And you continue to fail at reading comprehension. The longer growing seasons change the MEAN, not the temperatures that make up the mean. You do *NOT* have to have higher temps in order to have a higher mean. I've shown you the math and yet you continue to remain wilfully ignorant of the math!

I have given you data from two totally independent sources that show the same thing and you continue to call it cherry-picking. All while refusing to show any actual evidence of your own! That's not *my* problem, it is YOURS.

You've had to be tutored on variance, standard deviation, and the mean. You've been given two independent sources which validate my assertion and you've offered up nothing to invalidate the data. And you think you have been tutoring *me*? Like I said, you are a legend in your own mind!

The only inept one here is you, claiming you can tell the slope of the mean from the variance and the standard deviation. You *still* haven't explained what causes warmer atmosphere to get rid of its moisture. I've refuted everything you've offered and you have refuted nothing of mine, all you have done is have a temper tantrum like a six year old.

You are a TROLL. You think you can bully people into agreeing with you. Well, I know enough that you can't bully me and it makes you mad. Too bad.

 

Did you even *bother* to read the reference? It makes *NO* mention of changing urban readings to match the trends of rural stations.

As usual, you offer absolutely nothing to the discussion!

 

Plants cool the atmosphere beneath them when they transpire, it has nothing to do with my isolated station six feet above the ground. Evaporation increases moisture in the atmospere, ADDING to the trapping of heat.

Are you getting mad that someone on here dares to refute your AGW bible dogma? Too bad!

 

Well, wrong again, deserts get so hot due to little if any cloud cover and the same reason they get so cold at night.

 

Only because, as usual, you are wrong. They are interchangeable.

http://www.kylesconverter.com/energy,-work,-and-heat/joules-to-celsius-heat-units

Oh! And your colleague seems to believe that they are interchangeable too

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...te-change-hoax.507708/page-78#post-1067808395