Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

Discussion in '9/11' started by Hunter Rose, Aug 15, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dear Reader,

    I hope you care enough about your country to at least have a look at this before making up your mind. Please check it out sometime:

    Refutation of the 'official' 9/11 story, by Dr. Judy Wood, Ph.D:
    http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/B...iardBalls.html

    [​IMG]

    Conclusion: "In conclusion, the explanations of the collapse that have been given by the 9/11 Commission Report and NIST are not physically possible. A new investigation is needed to determine the true cause of what happened to these buildings on September 11, 2001. The destruction of all seven WTC buildings and especially WTC1 and WTC2 may be considered the greatest engineering disaster in the history of the world and deserves a thorough investigation." -Judy D. Wood, Ph.D

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Judy D. Wood is a former professor of mechanical engineering with research interests in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, optical methods, deformation analysis, and the materials characterization of biomaterials and composite materials. She is a member of the Society for Experimental Mechanics (SEM), co-founded SEM’s Biological Systems and Materials Division, and currently serves on the SEM Composite Materials Technical Division.

    [​IMG]

    Dr. Wood received her

    B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
    M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
    Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.
    Her dissertation involved the development of an experimental method to measure thermal stresses in bimaterial joints. She has taught courses including
    Experimental Stress Analysis,
    Engineering Mechanics,
    Mechanics of Materials (Strength of Materials)
    Strength of Materials Testing

    Take some time and discover the truth.
     
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Judy Wood has NO common sense.....calls dust kicked up by the feet of firefighters 'fuming',and wonders why teel exposed to fire rusts so quickly....Plust the idiotic 'directed energy weapons from space ' bit
     
  3. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    She has a PhD in Structural Engineering. What are your credentials, that you should question hers?

    First of all, she never says anything about "space beams". That is a rumor. She has overwhelming evidence in support of her conclusion that a Directed Energy Weapon caused the steel and concrete to dissociate at a molecular level, turning just those compounds to dust. This is why Aluminum and Paper were unharmed. This is also why countless cars several block away from ground zero were found flipped or on their side, and had electrical-like burns.

    Secondly, regardless of whether you support her Directed Energy Weapon conclusion, her REFUTATION of the OFFICIAL STORY has nothing to do with her overall conclusions. It simply disproves the official story using Physics and Common Knowledge.

    I recommend first checking out her Refutation of the Official Story, then going from there. I am surprised that so many of you think that this was a normal old jetfuel and gravity collapse.

    Good luck debunking this one (lol)...

    "In conclusion, the explanations of the collapse that have been given by the 9/11 Commission Report and NIST are not physically possible. A new investigation is needed to determine the true cause of what happened to these buildings on September 11, 2001. The destruction of all seven WTC buildings and especially WTC1 and WTC2 may be considered the greatest engineering disaster in the history of the world and deserves a thorough investigation." -Judy D. Wood, Ph.D
     
  4. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    sorry, but every bit you posted can be refuted by a person with ease, as woods bases her allegations upon assumption and ignoring common sense mixed with old fashioned hucksterism...Appealing to her authority might work if I respected her.


    I do not.
     
  5. ChrLz

    ChrLz Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, she doesn't - you've confused her (claimed) credentials.. A minor semantic niggle, it is true, but it suggests the sort of slack 'research' common in this sort of "I want to believe" approach.

    I don't make any claims about being an expert in the physics of building collapses, even though I do have a mech eng background. I do know enough about the field in general to know that the nature of analysing a structural collapse only begins with understanding the materials involved. It is an incredibly complex discipline that is not representable by a few simplistic graphs and assumptions about billiard balls.

    I didn't bother going deeply into her claims given the 'style' in which she writes - she is clearly off the wall. But I can tell you this - if her 'billiard ball' method is valid, why doesn't she simply show it being applied to a known demolition versus a known collapse?

    The thing is, this sort of kindergarten analysis is meaningless and worthless unless it is backed up by genuine understanding of the events being modelled/anlaysed. To be taken seriously it needs to be verified through repeatable and verifiable experimentation, through citations and references, through fully expanded and exposed mathematics, through showing all assumptions and error ranges, through using and proving the analysis on other events.. and so on.. to be worthy of any consideration.

    What I read showed absolutely NONE of that. Execrable garbage from pseudo-scientists. May I quote Dr Wood's 'biography' (written by, you guessed it, Dr Wood..)
    Read that back to yourself carefully, then look up the concept of confirmation bias. No investigator worth taking seriously would write such a hideous self-danmation (deliberate misspelling).

    But I guess this stuff gets a response from the uninformed, and sells some books...

    And by the way:
    O rly?

    From this page, I quote Dr Wood's own words:
    Mmmhmm. She 'never says anything about space beams', huh?

    Your comments would be appreciated.. And your future additional care in taking a little more time to research your chosen topic, might help your cred...

    That's the same sort of language 'Dr' Wood uses. Good luck with that approach.

    As for me... I won't get the fifteen minutes I just spent looking at that moron's 'analysis' back, sadly.
     
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe hunter could answer something for me....what happened to all the energy from all those 'moleculles' being disassociated?

    At the very least the heat should have cooked those survivors found in the WTC stairwell...
     
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My psychic abilities inform me that you will not receive a straight answer ...
     
  8. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The "DEW" people are kind of like the writers on Star Trek.

    When physics disagrees with what happens, they just "invent" technology that changes the laws of physics.

    Interestingly, the ST:TNG writers, when confronted with the problem, just used to write [TECH] in the script, and the producers would insert some goobledygook about dilithium and Jefferies' tubes on the set with the actors.
     
  9. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's called 'technobabble'
     
  10. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,797
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Perhaps you could tell me how many direct energy weapons Dr. Judy wood has engineered?
     
  11. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, she does not. She very clearly makes the case for Directed Energy Weapons, there is no reference to their origin, wheather from space or elsewhere.

    I will await your retratction.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    None of the local 'truthers' want to chime in on this thread?

    Odd.

    My two cents: Judy Wood was in a coma for quite awhile and woke up with her former intellect scrambled. That the defunct 'truth movement' embraced her is no surprise, given the straws they grasp on a regular basis.
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
     
  14. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A 20th Century Fox studio lot, of course.

    Alternate answer: Lucas' Skywalker Ranch.
     
  15. Doug_yvr

    Doug_yvr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    19,097
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I just can't imagine why these people are called '911 nutters'.
     
  16. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It certainly gives this guy a bad name:

    [​IMG]
     
    Doug_yvr and (deleted member) like this.
  17. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dr. Judy Wood, author of WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, was not invited to speak at the Toronto International Hearings on 9/11 in September. If you want a real investigation, the solution is simple. Purchase a copy of her book and read it. The book price of $39.95 will give you the truth. A $200 seat at the Toronto Hearings will give you a cover-up.
    http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/

    On 9/11 over a half mile of vertical building height, containing nearly 150 football fields of floor space, was reduced to a near-level field of dust and debris, where rescue workers walked horizontally or rappelled into empty caverns to look for survivors. How was this possible given the standard laws of engineering and physics? The 9/11 Commission Report bypassed this central issue, as did the report of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Contrary to its stated objective of determining 'why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed,' the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) made the stunning admission that it did not investigate how the towers fell. Neither the standard view that the Twin Towers collapsed from fire nor the standard opposition view that they were intentionally detonated by thermite explosives explains the evidence, nor do they follow the laws of engineering and physics. Dr. Wood left Clemson to research the 9/11 conundrum full time, and she has focused her research strictly on physical evidence and scientific principles. WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? provides an understandable, credible, and photo-enhanced summary of Dr. Wood's disturbing findings, which resulted in her lawsuit against the contractors of the NIST report.

    Dr. Judy Wood earned a Ph.D. Degree from Virginia Tech and is a former professor of mechanical engineering. She has research expertise in experimental stress analysis, structural mechanics, deformation analysis, materials characterization and materials engineering science. Her research has involved testing materials, including complex-material systems, in the area of photomechanics, or the use of optical and image-analysis methods to determine physical properties of materials and measure how materials respond to forces placed on them. Her area of expertise involves interferometry.

    She taught graduate and undergraduate engineering classes and has authored or co-authored over 60 peer-reviewed papers in her areas of expertise.

    In the time since 9/11/01, she has applied her expertise in materials science, image analysis and interferometry, to a forensic study of over 40,000 images, hundreds of video clips and a large volume of witness testimony pertaining to the destruction of the WTC complex. Dr. Wood has conducted a comprehensive forensic investigation of what physically happened to the World Trade Center site on 9/11. And, based on her analysis of the evidence she gathered, in 2007, she filed a federal qui tam case for science fraud against the contractors who contributed to the official NIST report about the destruction of the WTC. This case was filed in the US Supreme Court in Dec 2009. To this day, Dr. Wood's investigation is the only comprehensive forensic investigation in the public domain.

    Below please find a Coast to Coast radio interview, three Gary Null radio interviews, three Jeff Rense radio interviews and a book review by Eric Larsen, novelist and Emeritus Professor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, The City University of New York.

    "It all fell into the ground and was evaporated." -George Stephanopoulos
    http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/media/
    (Actually, to be accurate, it "evaporated" on the way down and not into the ground.)

    Coast to Coast AM- Where did the towers go? Dr. Judy Wood 05-03-2011
    Former professor of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University, Dr. Judy Wood discussed how the destruction of buildings in NYC on 9-11 was the result of directed energy technology, not planes, fire, thermite or bombs. Coast To Coast AM airs on approximately 542 stations in the U.S., Canada, Mexico and Guam with nearly three million listeners. Host: George Noory Time: 113 minutes
    http://www.frequency.com/video/coast-to-coast-am-where-did-towers-go-dr/5981733

    For more than 35 years Gary Null has had weekly programs on Pacifica radio stations KPFK, WPFW and WBAI. He also had his own very popular weekly program on WABC as well as ABC national radio. Additionally Gary has had more than 25 separate special programs presented on various Public Television Stations.


    The Gary Null Show- Where did the towers go? Dr. Judy Wood 06-28-2011 @ 00:36:55
    http://thegarynullshow.podbean.com/2011/06/28/the-gary-null-show/

    The Gary Null Show- Where did the towers go? Dr. Judy Wood 07-15-2011 @ 00:33:17​

    http://thegarynullshow.podbean.com/2011/07/15/the-gary-null-show/

    The Gary Null Show- Where did the towers go? Dr. Judy Wood 08-02-2011 @ 00:40:17​

    http://thegarynullshow.podbean.com/2011/08/02/the-gary-null-show/

    Jeff Rense produces the most consistently fascinating, intriguing, and definitely not always politically-correct talk and information program in radio. In addition to close to scores of nationwide broadcast affiliates, The Jeff Rense Program is probably the world's most listened-to radio program on the internet and the programs archives are considered unmatchable in broadcast journalism. His internet site is one of the world's elite and most referenced 24-hour news services. It is the world's number ONE talk radio site and records close to 10 million total hits per month.


    The Jeff Rense Program - Where did the towers go? Dr. Judy Wood 07-12-2011​

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkvmS53QVv0"]Rense & Dr Judy Wood - Where Did The Towers Go? - YouTube[/ame]

    The Jeff Rense Program - Where did the towers go? Dr. Judy Wood Part Two 07-24-2011​

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8b_jdIaPYE"]Rense & Dr Judy Wood - Where Did The Towers Go? Part 2 - YouTube[/ame]

    The Jeff Rense Program - Where did the towers go? Dr. Judy Wood Part Three 07-28-2011​

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZfjeinpDzI"]Rense & Dr Judy Wood - Where Did The Towers Go? Part 3 - YouTube[/ame]

    Where Did The Towers Go? - Evidence Of Directed Free-Energy Technology On 9/11 – Book Review by Eric Larsen Ph.D.​

    by Eric Larsen Ph.D.
    What a complete, unmitigated disaster 9/11 and the ten awful years following it have been—ten years of murder, crime, lawlessness, deceit, stupidity, and blindness that are only now meliorated, at long last, by the publication of Dr. Judy Wood’s unique, revelatory, and unequivocally welcome book, Where Did the Towers Go? The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11.

    http://www.atlanticfreepress.com/reviews/13984-where-did-the-towers-go-evidence-of-directed-free-energy-technology-on-911-book-review-by-eric-larsen-phd.html
     
  18. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,797
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Apparently Dr. Judy wood has not worked on any "directed energy weapons"

    Can anyone show evidence of a directed energy weapon that causes the materials of a building to "dissociate at a molecular level?"

    Anyone?
     
  19. Hunter Rose

    Hunter Rose Banned

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    86
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    A most excellent post, filled with information. Thank you.
     
  20. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You welcome Hunter Rose. I'm very fortunate to be in a position to disseminate this information. Even though the host of this radio program is young and unsophisticated, it's nice to know that not all youth today are controlled my main stream media and "9/11 Truthers". Dr. Judy Wood makes many important points in this hour long interview.
    [​IMG]
    Dr. Judy Wood: The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11​

    Cosmic Nostic Radio​

     
  21. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Filled with supposition ,is what it is
     
  22. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is a shame that people can pass judgement on Dr. Judy Wood without looking at the evidence or without commenting on why specific evidence leads them to a “different conclusion” – and that’s being polite. It is a real shame that people are missing what is behind all of this – and the “different world” it reveals. It is sad that they seem not to want information to be made available and would seemingly have research censored than actually studied. My suggestion is to read the book first before you make ignorant statements and embarrass yourself. A quote that has been attributed to Einstein is:

    “Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance”

    [​IMG]

    This debris pile is only 20% of the mass of the World Trade Center towers.​

    Where did the other 80% go?
     
  23. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    6,797
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So there's no evidence at all of such a directed energy weapon's existence.

    It's so odd that people are willing to subscribe to fiction in lieu of an unpleasant reality.
     
  24. Doug_yvr

    Doug_yvr Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2008
    Messages:
    19,097
    Likes Received:
    1,816
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There was a Directed Energy Weapon but it was sneaked on to Air France Flight 447 which was shot down by a Navy Destroyer as a cover up. To cover up the shooting of the plane the entire crew of the Navy Destroyer was killed by a Directed Energy Weapon that only turns sailors into dust leaving ships, dock-hands and the like untouched.
     
  25. Emmanuel_Goldstein

    Emmanuel_Goldstein New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Last week I went to the pool in our gated community and met two guys from Key West who have a Summer home on a lake in Iowa and were en route to Provincetown, MA. The conversation turned to modes of traveling and I made the remark that I would never fly again as long as TSA screening is in place because of what I knew about 9/11. I then started talking about WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? and it was received with very attentive ears. One of them asked me, "Do you know who Jesse Ventura is?" To which I replied, "I certainly do." He then asked, "Do you think he has read the book?" I answered, "Of course he has!" He then interjected, "I'm a friend of Jesse Ventura and he tried to get me to run for a political office but I declined the offer." Later I came back to the pool with my copy and showed him the book. He decided to order it.
    [​IMG]
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page