No, it's just an utterly ridiculous thing to say that rapists are forced to not rape. They can rape all they want, it's just illegal, and they should be killed for it.
Yes and I agree that this is a significant difference. So significant that many women who would not kill their BORN children, are okay with killing their UNBORN children. This means that they don't have intent to kill their unborn human children. Therefore they don't have the requisite mens rea for a murder prosecution.
If they think that the unborn inside them is a human being, and kill them anyway, then why don't they kill their BORN kids?
LOL, your poor sexist view of women as completely stupid is so 17th century....and so inaccurate...does it make you feel smarter better by pretending women are stupid? Most women know a fetus from a born person with rights....too bad not everyone can tell the difference..
You're talking about legal rights. That's a LEGAL argument, which is the only type of argument that you're capable of making.
FoxHastings said: ↑ LOL, your poor sexist view of women as completely stupid is so 17th century....and so inaccurate...does it make you feel smarter better by pretending women are stupid? Most women know a fetus from a born person with rights....too bad not everyone can tell the difference.. It's the only one that counts....silly , twisted, sexist "arguments" are only opinions and don't count. Why don't YOU answer the question: chris155au said: ↑ If they think that the unborn inside them is a human being, and kill them anyway, then why don't they kill their BORN kids?
Once again. Its very simple, if the woman doesn't want it inhabiting her body she has every right to have it removed even if this results in its death