Elementary Schools In Canada Mandated To Fly Gay Pride Flags. The One Dissenting Voice Got Shut Down

What's the recommended sentence? Lacking that, what's the sentence recieved by the last person who went to jail over it?

You ever wonder if maybe their are already enough people on the planet and the rise of homosexuality was a direct response to that?

I don't think our species is in danger of dying out from lack of procreation.....

 

No, we've never come close to any maximum the planet can support.

Baby bust! Millennials aren’t having enough babies to keep up with generation before them

According to Indy100.com, the fertility rate in 2010 was 2.1, meaning it kept pace with deaths.

The most recent data shows the number is 1.8. That means “negative” population growth.

“The fertility rate decline is driven entirely by millennial mothers in their teens and twenties. Birth rates for all age groups of women under 30 fell to record lows in 2016,” the Negative Population Growth report said.

https://fox8.com/2017/11/20/baby-bu...abies-to-keep-up-with-generation-before-them/

Could it possibly be tied to normalizing homosexuality and same sex sex and celebrating it in their schools?

 

Hey I'm OK with individuals celebrating their sex, this is about the schools creating a celebrate for the children, so why not heterosexuality too? Shouldn't heterosexual children feel just as important as homosexual children and know that what they choose is just as good?

 

That's one way of looking at it. Here's another: if your life were anything to rave about, you wouldn't feel a compulsion to imagine things about people you don't know, as if that could somehow repeal the truth.

Actually I'm pretty sure homosexual bigots have done more damage to society in the last half century than any other sort of bigot.

 

You're asking me to prove a negative, essentially you are asking for documentation of a law that does not exist. It's not rational, I cannot provide documentation of a law not existing

 

Ask the school to celebrate anything you want. Have a white history month. Have a WASP day. Have a straight pride parade.

And see the response you get...not just from the school but the parents

 

That is fine with me

 

nope. we can reproduce without any heterosexual activity. People do so all the time.

no we don't, as I've shown you. But the point that keeps refuting your argument is homosexuals have no effect at all on heterosexuals procreating.

and this has been repeatedly refuted. homosexuality has no effect at all on procreation. It has existed for the entirety of recorded human history, and is not abnormal to the species.

which is irrelevant. There's nothing vital or necessary about religion, or eye color, or hair color either.

equal celebration. No problems with that at all.

 

lol I knew you couldn't debate the actual law and provided zero evidence to support your BS claim the law doesn't require jail time if you don't pay the fine.

This is why you keep losing. I quote the actual law and you quote nothing but your own worthless opinion Thanks for staying predictable.

 

No I'm asking you to prove your claim that this passing is not legally binding and as predicted you ran away from doing so.

Next time don't make a claim you can't back up with the law and this won't be a problem.

 

Your honestly going to try and argue that straight people aren't having babies because there are more gay people? That's ridiculous on it's face.

Here are the reasons why people aren't having as many kids in North America

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/05/upshot/americans-are-having-fewer-babies-they-told-us-why.html

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4255510/

I think the quote in this one sums it up perfectly
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-46118103

Our countries are becoming advanced enough that people want to enjoy themselves. How many people today, who were born to boomers, were born when their parents were in their early 20s?

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/08/04/upshot/up-birth-age-gap.html
Look at the difference in general age of mothers between 1980 and 2016. The change is startling in terms of how much older many women are having kids. I would say there is a huge segement of potential parents who aren't having kids (or are waiting) because they attribute the stress of their parents and lack of mature parenting skills without correlating the fact that it was because of the young age. So they wait to have kids and then when they get old enough to be responsible enough, they realize they don't want kids and simply want to enjoy their lives (not everyone, but you get the idea).

And, finally, you notice how the word 'Gay' comes up in exactly NONE of all of this? The only angle of acceptance of gay people that I could fathom being tied into the dropping birth rates, is that more and more gay men don't feel the need to hide behind a wife and kids anymore, so they don't marry a women and have kids.

 

Your banging your head against a brick wall.

He doesn't understand that anything not codefied in law, means it's not illegal. Everything is legal until it's made illegal and he never gets that.

 

No that wasn't what I said, someone said we were in no danger of losing population. The article shows otherwise.

 

Nope it still takes a male and a female, your other non-responses and misdirection's noted as usual.

 

What was the response to celebrating and honoring homosexuality? You've still not given a reason why one and not the other?

 

Im not offended. The problem with giving a government institution the power to push what you agree with is that it will eventually be used to push something you oppose. I am not sure why my position makes you angry. There is no difference in those who show contempt for gay people and those, who like you, show the same based on the color of ones skin. I believe the pot and the kettle had such an exchange!

 

Because we tend to celebrate groups that have been historically persecuted and discriminated against.

But good luck with white history month

 

Where are you getting lost? 2 homosexuals can procreate, using artificial means. It does not require heterosexuals to do so.

My other responses directly refuted your point, as usual. Homosexuals have exactly zero effect on heterosexuals procreating.

 

Imagine Canada turning into a fascist state.

 

By applying racism and bigotry.

 

Good luck with white history month. Lol

 

I don’t push for racist months like you do.

 

Yeah it's great. Lol

 

Except that why does it matter what 5% of the population (who don’t procreate personally) does WRT birth populations?

Also way to ignore and cut out all the information as to “why” birth rates are dropping. As you have been championing hereto relationships over Homo because of the need to procreate, it seems odd that you would ignore all the info showing why those birth rates are dropping

 

in a way I agree, kinda like showing roots in grade school confuses kids, the intention is good, but it makes kids feel "different" and that is not the goal

now high school it would not be as big a deal