Here are the real female fighters- the girls who risk their lives cleaning up after your Israeli baby-killing filth ;
If in 50-100 years, Western Europe falls under Sharia, will that have been a good idea? Will feminism and the progressive movement have weakened Western resolve over time? NATO can't handle Libya now. I know progressives don't like to think outside of their dogma or question their one true faith, but take the long historical view for a change. _
Oh dear! Another misspelling. It's WUMPS. You know! Those black and white things Englishmen wear on their feet. Especially when they feel the need to kick the crap out of you.
This Englishman seems to have only socks on his feet...the other fellow took his shoes...no WUMPS there...only WIMPS...
When I say English, I am speaking of the English white man. I don't believe they are wimps. I believe their government has taught them to be dependent on government for their protection. To the degree that they have been accustomed to show force and not use it. I even noticed some of the riot police posturing themselves in a show of force but not using it. Just an observation. I believe the Englishman is handcuffed by his government in defending himself. Such as are many of the white race everywhere. Quantrill
I think you forgot the typical American response,"If it were me, I'd blow his f...ing head off" Has it struck you yet who might be behind the camera, 1, 5, 10? Discretion is the better part of valour.
And who is to blame for that, since you used the term 'everywhere', something which I happen to agree with you.
Look at that situation? I'dv handed the dude my shirt and shoes and the minute his hands were filled and my feet were light I'd would've knocked that boy out and I'm no bigger than that white kid. The dude is completely relaxed and knows he has that kid cowed. I'd let him think that to and relax. he'd never see it coming. Then I'd take HIS pants and shoes.. those look pretty nice.
My, my, my...first you talk about WUMPS for kicking the (*)(*)(*)(*) out of people...but when confronted with what ACTUALLY happened, you changed your tune and now talk about 'Discretion is the better part of valour"... My motto: Be prepared.
Funny listening to all the Yanks blowing their trumpets about how hard they are. You dont seem to understand, we dont need guns because we are pretty unlikely to ever find ourselves in a situation where we need one. I dont permanently wear a lifejacket in case of flash floods. You think you are hard but you need guns. Anyway, it might surprise you, but Marxists dont advocate banning guns, because in certain circumstances we advocate arming the masses, eg Indonesia 1965, Chile 1973 etc. However there is little evidence that Americans are safer because of guns. What it means is that for example a mugger or intruder will also feel the need to carry a gun in case you shoot him, and he will be harder than you so he will shoot you first.
This thread isn't about the USA unless someone changed the title. Just try using your "be prepared' in England and see where it will get you. Wimp or no wimp, you won't see your USA for a bit but you might find your face rearranged from inside a jail cell where women are as dangerous as men.
That is an assumption. Smith and Wesson says it doesn't matter who is the harder or tougher. Who shoots first. Quantrill
Criminals are armed in this country (Australia), it`s the responsible firearm owner who`s persecuted by the laws. Anti gunners universally take a shallow view of the issue of voilent crime, crime is a complex social issue, their arguments against responsible firearm ownership are emitove at best, and dishonest in the main.