Federal Judge Compares Abortion Industry to Nazi Eugenics: It’s 'Pure Evil' to Target Certain Babies

...“Many think that eugenics ended with the horrors of the Holocaust,” Griffin wrote. “Unfortunately, it did not. The philosophy and the pure evil that motivated Hitler and Nazi Germany to murder millions of innocent lives continues today. Eugenics was the root of the Holocaust and is a motivation for many of the selective abortions that occur today.”

Griffin then quoted, approvingly, a 2019 opinion by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas that also compared eugenics to some of the goals of abortion.

“Coined in 1883 by British statistician Francis Galton, ‘eugenics’ is ‘the science of improving stock through all influences that tend in however remote a degree to give to the more suitable races or strains of blood a better chance of prevailing speedily over the less suitable than they otherwise would have,’” Griffin wrote, quoting Thomas.

Griffin added, “Following Nazi Germany’s horrific implementation of eugenics to its natural conclusion, the eugenics movement lost its popularity. … Tragically, however, the practice continues today with modern-day abortions. Specifically, the selective abortion of unborn babies who are deemed ‘unfit’ or ‘undesirable’ is becoming increasingly common.”
Griffin, who was nominated by President George W. Bush, listed examples of how abortion fulfills the goals of the eugenics movement....




https://www.christianheadlines.com/...s-its-pure-evil-to-target-certain-babies.html




This is a hard news article reporting upon the written concurrent opinions of three judges on the 6th circuit court of appeals. The court ruled in favor of an Ohio law making it illegal to get or perform an abortion if it’s because of a Downs or other similar diagnosis. The judges supported by writings of Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas were wise to compare certain kinds of elective abortion to eugenics.

 

There is no absolute right to an abortion under every circumstance according to the ruling. This ruling sets up dueling appeals court rulings on Down’s syndrome abortions virtually assuring a Supreme Court intervention. We don’t have to be like China or Iceland.

 

.

In Hitler's Third Reich it was a capital crime to abort a healthy German baby.

.

 

I doubt they would have wanted to kill the mother, probably sent her to a breeding facility.

Lebensborn - Wikipedia

 

That is an EVIL PERVERTED BIG LIE!

Hitler promoted traditional family values = German women as traditional wives and mothers.

Winners of wars write propaganda instead of true history!

The winner of WW2 was STALIN and his evil perverted antichrist cultural marxists !!

.

 

Hooey.

 

We are talking about killing babies diagnosed with Downs Syndrome or other diseases discovered in the pre born. Nazis would have engaged in eugenics against those preborn babies.

 

If you are referring to my news story it really is about appeals court judges who wrote a concurrent opinion that equated certain abortions with nazi eugenics.

 

Unless you are wanting to financially support a child with DS, including all medical care as well as support to offset the parents losses from work and upon the eventual early death of the child, then you — or this judge — have no right to tell them what to do.

 

Having DS should not be an automatic death sentence.

 

It isn’t. It is up to the parents to decide if they are willing to take on that level of permanent responsibility. Many choose to have the child but the ones that do not it should be their decision. Not yours, unless you are willing to pay with all associated costs, are you?

 

There are a lot of support systems to help take care of DS children. There’s also the adoption option.

 

What percent of children with DS are adopted?

23,000 children currently age out of the foster care system each year, a system that is rifle with abuse and mistreatment, at the end of that 20% of them end up homeless in poverty.

Is that really your solution?

 

I’ve been a foster parent short term for three and adopted another 9 years ago. I intend to adopt again.

 

That’s great!

What about the other 22,998 children?

 

For those who don't see how this is wrong, imagine a mother who keeps aborting until she gets a baby with blue eyes.

 

For those who don’t see how this is wrong, imagine forcing a woman under penalty of death or imprisonment to act as an incubator at the will of the state.

 

Ya really kicked butt with that one

 

Another judge who is not fit for the bench

 

You you think that eugenics is an acceptable reason to kill ones own human being baby?

 

No babies are killed in abortion.

 

Oh, look. Another Nazi found his way here after so many years.

 

Just because something is a right does not mean it is always moral. The extreme scenario you have described here would be one scenario that is immoral. However, it does not change the fact that the woman in question has the right to abort.

Sometimes giving birth is immoral too.

 

I think the reason for an abortion is the decision of the woman.
What that reason is isn’t relevant.

A zygote is not a baby

 

Are you saying that giving birth when it's a down syndrome baby is immoral, or only sometimes?

Could it ever be immoral to give birth to a baby who will have ADHD, as indicated by an intrauterine genetic test, in your opinion?

If that's what you think, I don't think genetically engineered designer babies are that far away.