Finally! This is where the fun begins!

Agree!

​

 

“While this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime,
it also does not exonerate him.”
Mr. Barr quoted Mr. Mueller as writing.​

Indeed! Republican Barr, as Trump's Attorney General, quoting his Republican Justice Department's Special Counsel, merely stated the obvious.

​

 

The "Trump is fully exonerated" is already losing steam at the end of the first day.

 

Yeah... Every single possible answer: Yes, no, maybe, it's trustworthy, it's not trustworthy, it's a fact and it's a hoast. You betI don't like


About that #FakeNews, seems to me the people who are lost are the ones who've bought into the two year long parade of MSM Russian collusion conspiracy that has now been proven false.

37 indictments is nothing. When 26 of them are for Russians who will never see one day in court, and the rest are process crimes or old charges unrelated to the campaign, your most glaring accomplishment is the validation of the validity of the 2016 election of Trump.[/QUOTE]

That is such a great Churchill quote! And so appropriate.

 

Perfect. We can start with James Comey.

 

No, he is fully exonerated.

No Collusion, No Conspiracy and No obstruction on justice.

Pretty much a home run for Trump except for those that refuse to accept the Mueller conclusions.

 

These are especially funny in light of your hoax crashing and burning.

Haaahahahahaaa!

 

They also said no collusion and not enough to charge obstruction so he's totally not being charged which means he's exonerated. Mueller cleared him on collusion and Barr and Rosenstein cleared him on obstruction.

Even the President says it's total exoneration. I believe the President!

 

Mueller is a typical Washington swamp monster. That is why he put in the throw away line, "does not exonerate Trump." That was to mollify the lunatic Democrats in the Congress. No charges means EXONERATED!

"This is not the end, it's not even beginning of the end, it's the actual end of the Democrat Party! You will never recover from this disgraceful chapter of our history."

PatriotNews

 

.

 

What exactly do you think the other investigations will turn up that Mueller hasn't in nearly 2 years?

 

We will be starting with James Comey and investigating Trump's obstruction of justice.

Exonorated of collusion, yes; but not of obstruction of justice and other matters.

The Democrats' focus is shifting to the question Mueller pointedly left unanswered: whether Trump obstructed the investigation by firing FBI Director James Comey and dictating a misleading statement about his son's meeting with the Russian lawyer.

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/ap-a...-235142966.html?.tsrc=daily_mail&uh_test=2_11

 

We do not know, and neither do you.

 

Actually 3 years. This all started in 2015 with the insiders first trying to thwart the candidate then trying to take him down once elected. On top of that, all of the FBI agents involved in conducting the investigation into Trump before Mueller ended up working on the Mueller case. Only because of a chance finding by the IG was Strzok removed form the Mueller investigation.

Yet they still found nothing about collusion and really nothing about obstruction but punted to give Nadler some fodder.

 

What has been released so far is like going to Outback for a steak and getting salad with no dressing. It raises more questions which is not exactly what I was looking for. Looks like this will stretch to sometime in 2030.

 

It doesn't. But if you ever decide to contribute anything with any content, could you please write "this one does includes actual arguments".at the top. I keep wasting my time reading your posts and find nothing in them of value. I just don't want to keep wasting my time.

Thank you ...

 

His financial crimes, mostly. Mueller's investigation was about collusion with Russia. The only relevant thing that was expected from them was obstruction of justice. Which is pretty blatant, BTW. And, of course, there are impeachable crimes that might be relevant, even though Republicans are likely to protect him. Unless they decide to place patriotism before partisan politics. Oh, and let's not forget that he is the co-conspirator (un-indicted, for now) known as "Individual 1". Which should be pretty easy..

 

Other Trump crimes? Financial, probably obstruction of justice, maybe collusion found in other investigations. Plus all the actions that can be indicted in impeachment actions.

 

Yes, yes, yes, we are all waiting with bated breath to hear what new and crazy conspiracy theories will be coming from the TDS left.

What will they be?

 

Barr did not exonerate Trump.

 

That's a list of wishful thinking. That's things I'm sure deep down in your heart of hearts you wish Trump have provably done. Unfortunately he didn't.

 

"This one does includes actual arguments"
You still think there's a case for obstruction? What's the main argument for that? Mean tweets about Mueller or firing James Comey?

Let's start with the latter. Comey screwed up the Crooked Hillary email investigation, no rigged it, and when he decided that he would decide not to press charges, I called for his firing. Every Republican felt he overstepped his authority. He should have passed it on to the Justice Department for a decision. That's were prosecuting decisions are made. His job is to investigate. Having a press conference exposing what she did was wrong. You don't smear someone who isn't being charged. Obama should have fired him then and I and many Republicans called for him to be fired. Democrats loved him for exonerating Crooked Hillary.

Then he publicly reopened the investigation a week before the election, kneecapping Crooked Hillary's chance of winning. I thought as well as every Democrat that was unfair. He should have just notified the gang of 8 in secret so close to the election. Now every Republican hated him, and every Democrat hated him. Democrats called for his resignation/firing as did I, again. Obama, being the weak leader he is, did not have the courage to do it after both of these incidents of poor judgment. Then he did it again 3 days before the election, clearing her once again and bringing the issue back in the spotlight days before the election which displeased both Democrats and Republicans. Again, Obama was too wimpy to fire Comey even after Crooked Hillary lost and Democrats were blaming Comey for it.

So everyone wanted Comey fired, but when Trump finally did it, (I think he should have done it the first day), Dems all of a sudden made Comey out to be a good guy, even though he did more to interfere in the election than Russia or Vladimir Putin!

The Russia investigation was being conducted by the FBI, firing the head of the FBI did nothing to stop that. So there's no case for obstruction of justice for firing an incompetent FBI Director that everyone wanted out to begin with.

So what do you have left? Mean tweets against Mueller, investigating a crime that didn't happen that Trump was merely defending himself against?

Now go ahead and explain what you think is obstruction of justice?

 

He also did not charge him with anything or attempt to indict any number of people that had any of your pipe dreams been true could have been indicted. While he may not have said exonerate for all intents and purposes he may as well have.

 

If Mueller had just even a small slight possibility of giving a convincing argument for impeachment for obstruction of justice, YOU DAMN WELL BET HE WOULD HAVE!

 

In order to get away with something he'd have actually have had to do something illegal.