Former Breitbart Editor: Stephen Miller is a white supremacist.

LOL! As opposed to your fake news source.....

 

Still using DISCREDITED extremist rightwing DISINFORMATION sources?

 

Are you not aware the guy is black and has a background in civil rights and labor laws, and so obviously has no clue about the amount of crime of immigrants?

 

Your claim is not founded. So you know... worthless.

 

I'm aware he's black, but your entire argument for Stephen Miller being a white supremacist revolves around his attitudes towards illegal immigrant crime. So if Peter Kirsanow believes the same thing about illegal immigrant crime, by your "logic" he should be a white supremacist too.

Or...ideas about illegal immigrant crime have nothing to do with white supremacy.

 

I indeed put up a source and quoted a text from it, to you extensively, proving indeed that Miller is a white supremacist.

That is a massive if. All I see is him contesting research that is not close to his own expertise.

 

Your position gets crazier and crazier. So if you contest research that says illegals are less criminal than citizens, you are not necessarily a white supremacist? But if you accept the argument that same person makes, you ARE a white supremacist?

 

You're just making a persona attack here, while I just have posted what white supremacy is about.
Miller fits that perfectly. I sourced that on page 18. And you all have done now for 14 pages is whining.
And now it's... is contesting research the same as spreading fake news? Good lord. lol

 

Hey I just want you to answer my question. So, if you contest research that says illegals are less criminal than citizens, you are not necessarily a white supremacist? But if you accept the argument that same person makes, you ARE a white supremacist?

 

I was rather clear in what makes a white supremacist. I sourced it OVER and OVER.
And, again. It's not my definition or my opinion.

And here you are 24 pages later still not able to understand rather basic English.
That Kirsanow could be some idiot who is totally not aware how sound the research is.
Being an idiot does not make you a white supremacist.
How hard is this?

 

How hard is it? Well you were not able to answer my question, so pretty hard I guess. But let's try again; if you contest research that says illegals are less criminal than citizens, you are not necessarily a white supremacist? But if you accept the argument that same person makes, you ARE a white supremacist?

 

What claim? You made the claim and cannot back it up.

 

I answered your question. You just don't like the reply, like you don't like to read that Miller is a white supremacist.
Sorry that my sources hurt your feelings.

Let's not. We're on page 32, and my source stands of what the believes are of white supremacist. And that Miller is pushing that narrative in his emails. Do note, you demanded me to prove those emails exist, even when Miller doesn't deny they exist. lol

 

This claim "fake news source"

I sourced it. You did not.

 

What is right wing? There is a populist right and there is a globalist chamber of commerce right. The globalist right (including the Koch brothers) are spending millions of dollars to open the borders and increase immigration. The populist right's number one priority is closing the border and reducing immigration. So which right wing are you referring to?

 

Your sources didn't hurt my feelings, but they did insult my intelligence.

If you continue to take what is a factless and illogical position, I'm sure we can get to page 50, especially if you continue to refuse a simple question about your theory of constitutes white supremacy, so again, if you contest research that says illegals are less criminal than citizens, you are not necessarily a white supremacist? But if you accept the argument that same person makes, you ARE a white supremacist?

 

Wrong. Try again.

 

Factless? I sourced the facts on page 18! We're on page 32 and you still refuse to accept the text of my source.
I've been waiting for 14 pages for you to come up with a source to disprove it.

 

My source on page 18 still stands. You failed to disprove it.

 

Why don't you be very specific about what you think I need to disprove? After of course you answer my question, which is if you contest research that says illegals are less criminal than citizens, you are not necessarily a white supremacist? But if you accept the argument that same person makes, you ARE a white supremacist?

 

There is nothing to disprove.

 

You're free to disprove my post on page 18.

And than we can add Miller pushing fake idea's that black people got more testosterone and so are more violent.
We can go on that Miller pushed the idea immigrants will be the cause of the destruction of the western civilization.
Add his idea's that "The races are not identical and equivalent" that's just synonymous to white people master rac

 

except for my source on page 18. Your opinion is not backed up with a source.

 

Please provide the emails where Miller said that.

 

We've been through this, that Miller doesn't deny he wrote those emails. So there is no point for me to find them for you. I told you this before.... before page 18 even. You never gave a reply to that argument.... after all this time. lol