George Bush Sr is an official witness at same-sex wedding

Race is not a matter of choice, they are who they are. Homo's are because they have made a choice to be perverts. Homo's can be who they wish to be as long as they stay in the closet and do not subject us real Americans to their shameful deeds.

 

Rand Paul sold this idea and said you should still be allowed to refuse service to black people.
I take it you're on board?
When you open a public establishment you open it to the public.

 

Wrong. Same-sex attraction is not a choice. I think you know that but you're just parroting ridiculous rightwing talking points.

The majority of Americans do not view homosexuality as shameful, they view it as morally correct. No amount of whining is going to change that.

 

Being a pervert contrary to design is a choice. Unless you are suggesting that Homo's are maladaptive mutations that serve no purpose to mankind.

 

Homosexuality isn't contrary to design - it occurs naturally, in animals that don't make "decisions" for themselves. Stop trying to dress up your irrational religious views in a secular manner.

 

When did I mention my religion? I didn't. It is just progressive leftist homo-centric Christophobia so I will ignore it as the hateful ignorence that it is.

 

Stop being a knee-jerk tool for once and throwing around words you can't even begin to understand the meaning of.

You haven't made a successful secular argument was my point, yet you attempt to dress it up as one. Thus your personal religious inspired beliefs are relevant, whether you mention them this time or not.

 

I have made an excellant and highly cogent seculare argument, but progressive leftists are too dim to understand it or its relevance because they think that any opposition to perversity must only be religious and therefore it is incorrectly assumed that it is easily dismissed, muchless its truth and brillience. So they use thinly veiled insults because ultimately they know in their hearts that I am right.

 

Your definition of being persecuted/insulted is bizarre.

You're acting like it hasn't been established on here that your religious views on morality affect your beliefs about gay people. And the fact is you haven't made a coherent secular argument, hence why we go back to the root cause of your bigotry.

 

What kind of idiot says that someone attending their friends' wedding equates to "the end" of a party's stance?

C'mon... name names.

 

You also have no interest in responding to my points directly and would rather make it about how you are treated.

 

Tax breaks and governmental entitlements arent freedom.

 

So you are saying you have experienced homo urges before and chose not to indulge them?

So much for freedom eh?

- - - Updated - - -

At least not to the people who don't get them.

I am guessing that there would be hell to pay if all the married hetero couples were suddenly denied these "freedoms" though. Do you think?

 

What purpose does oral sex serve?

- - - Updated - - -

So you are saying that society can only restrict things that are a matter of choice?

 

No. Homosexuality is not a choice. Lying and ignorance are choices. You have made those choices. And they are a deviant, repulsive lifestyle.

 

Any links to the scientific studies that have proven this ?

Not arguing against it, but hey... you seem certain.

And maybe the only person on Earth that "knows" this.

 

Actually, I think the burden of proof should be on you, since I would know better whether or not I chose something than you would. If you are saying I am wrong, I think you need to provide evidence.

[video=youtube;T4vC9TmUm5o]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T4vC9TmUm5o[/video]

 

Scientific studies show numerous biological links.

Not a single study has shown that one can attain sexual attraction to a certain gender that wasn't previously there.

Not a single study has demonstrated someone "undoing" their sexual attraction to either gender.

 

Would you settle for The Washington Times? A very right-wing paper?

http://communities.washingtontimes..../homosexuality-choice-modern-science-says-no/

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation#Twin_studies

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation#Chromosome_linkage_studies

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation#Epigenetics_studies

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation#Birth_order

We can start with those.

 

Maybe not.

The fact that homos themselves do not reproduce is not evidence that homosexuality does not contribute to their family's gene propagation.

 

They are not freedoms to those who get them or those who are denied. Tax breaks and governmental entitlements aren't freedoms

 

Silly logic. That if heterosexuals are born heterosexual, homosexuals must also be born that way. There is a biological, drive that causes a very strong attraction to the opposite sex. Ive not seen any evidence of such a biological drive in the case of homosexuals. I don't doubt that to varying degrees people can be born without this biological drive which enables an attraction to the same sex to develop. Does not dictate it.

 

Are they entitlements? Welfare?

Legal recognition of a marriage carries benefits that have nothing to do with money.

 

If they had urges different from yours, then it was not a choice. You are saying you never had those urges...that alone is evidence of a biological difference.

If they are not experiencing this drive towards the opposite sex, that would seem to indicate a biological difference. Not a conscious choice.

You have seen evidence. Homosexuals have told you. You may not accept the evidence, but it is clearly there.