George Zimmerman Left Wife, Shellie, Bullet-Riddled Target As Threat

If someone snatches your purse.. that's assault.

 

Sign!..... please, Margot..... think!

Starting with ...."IF I HAD A SON, HE WOULD LOOK LIKE TRAYVON" which was spoken by the PRESIDENT OF THE U.S. His unethical, flamebaiting public comment was followed by Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton and the Black Panthers marching to Florida where GZ lived. The BP even had a bounty of GZ's head.......and AFTER the not guilty verdict, DOJ ERIC HOLDER stepped in, saying he would check to see if there could be any other charge filed against GZ, an American citizen who had been tried in a court of law and the jury spoke........

So what do you think, Margot? Is this liberalism rearing it's ugly little head or not?.

 

She or her father should have pressed assault charges after Zimmerman's violent tantrum. I don't know why they didn't but it seems that Zimmerman gets off the hook one more time.

 

I agree.. She made a mistake not to file charges.

- - - Updated - - -

Oh piffle.. Read his comment in context.. He expressed sympathy for both families.

You may think its about "liberalism".. but then you seem blinkered by hate against the president.

 

So because he didn't commit a battery you nullified an assault charge? Why would you do that? Perhaps that is why jurors should follow the judges instructions and not try to play lawyer.

 

That's the best you can come up with? "Oh pffft! You hate the president". I dislike him, but I don't hate him..... I don't 'hate'. period!

The POTUS comment about his son would have looked like TM is what stirred up the racial pot and after that, out came the liberals Jackson, Sharpton, the BP's straight out of the woodwork, heading to Fla.....and after the trial, Holder came into the pix w/his comment. So you couldn't see this clear pix of what was happening, huh?

If you can't understand that high ranking officials - such as the POTUS, VP, senators, etc needs to keep their mouths SHUT about a case which concerns an American citizen facing trial b/c their public opinion could very easily sway the up-coming jury pool..... well, dang! What can I say? Except .... get educated about what's ethical and unethical . Any 1st yr law student knows this and Obama was a Constitutional lawyer?

 

The fact that so many "gun rights" people consider obvious intimidation like this to be just a big joke is very disturbing.

When an armed person makes a threat, direct or implied, I believe that gives the unarmed person implicit legal permission to disarm, disable or kill the armed person ANYTIME, ANYWHERE, awake or asleep, with no fear of conviction.

 

Please provide us all with the :context" that you delude changes Pres. Mommy Pants' blatant racial pandering, into something else.

 

The way you are expressing yourself is rude and belittling.

There was NO unethical issue with President Obama relating his empathy to Trayvon's parents. I am not Black, but when I heard that a 17 year old unarmed kid had been shot by a "vigilante" kind. . .I immediately thought of my oldest grandson, who is 15, and how it would made me feel if it had been him coming home from a convenience store and being found "suspicious" because of the way he dressed, or because he was taking his time while on the phone with a friend!

Why do some people have to relate EVERYTHING to skin color? The President has two daughter, one of which is not that far from Trayvon's age. . . .OBVIOUSLY as a parent he would feel empathy for the lost of a kid!

I am amazed that EVERY parent didn't feel empathy! Is that because it was a BLACK kid?

 

Look it up, Grok. and stop being lazy..

 

Try again! Why then do so many people talk about Zimmerman as a "SECURITY GUARD," doing his duty!

You don't seem to have an issue with that kind of FALSE information. . .
Since Zimmerman KNEW he wasn't suppose to carry when doing his "rounds," once he got out of his car to follow the kid, he should have left his gun in the car.

 

LOLOL.. George wasn't a security guard except in his imagination.. He wasn't anything at all.

 

Yep! I totally agree. However, too many of George's admirers USE the "security guard" or "Neighborhood watch captain" excuse for the reason why he was "suspicious" of the kid.

 

Edit: nm

 

Oh look something else is happening in George Zimmerman's life. Let's make global news of it.

 

I couldn't care enough to salivate over all the details - people with a strong negative fixation on sex tend to make me uncomfortable

 

Indeed I did. I'd do it again. When the charges were laid out in her introduction, the DA suggested that he had choked her, pushed her down, hit her and put his knee on her throat. All serious charges. It wasn't until she had completely had every one of those charges countered that she brought up the cell phone.

She was grasping at straws at that point. I wasn't going to put him in jail based on her failure to prove her case. In fact, every one of the jurors said she didn't prove her case until she brought out the cell phone snatching.

Read up on jury nullification before suggesting that I don't have a right to set a man free when it is clear to me that the prosecution was grasping at straws. If you think judges are always right, I can't change your mind.

 

Oh, good grief..... this really is a waste of my time. It doesn't MATTER what else he said! Stand up like a well-educated adult and try to see the difference.

If Obama had felt so compelled to offer his condolences to both families, but left out the emotional and personalizing the case w/his 'my son would have looked like Trayvon' comment, I don't think anyone would have much cared, but he didn't do that........

You libs are one strange breed.......

 

Yes, why do some people have to relate EVERYTHING to skin color? Why do YOU do that? You bring up the race card more than most here.

I'm going to say this one more time and I will type this reeeeal slow, so m/b it'll sink in........

A high ranking public official, such as the POTUS is held to high standards by the public and the office he holds, expecting him to be ethical and professional. it is unprofessional, unethical and downright TACKY for the POTUS to pick and choose ONE family out of this country to address the loss of their son and making it EMOTIONAL & PERSONAL for HIMSELF by saying if he had a son he would look like theirs. DO YA GET IT YET?!

He can't possibly address all of the parents who lost a child under tragic circumstances, even those that made the news, so don't do it for just ONE! It's times like this when the POTUS or whatever public figure needs to keep his or her mouth shut, particularly when a TRIAL is coming up and a POTUS' personal comment about the case could very likely contaminate the jury pool.......damn! Do you really need to have this explained to you?

There are times in everyone's lives when they need to zip the lip, particularly those who hold public office and every American citizen is entitled, according to the Constitution, to a fair trial! Even if they're hated by most - it is their Constitutional right!

Sadamie, climb down off your pedestal and quit being so melodramatic. "I am amazed that EVERY parent didn't feel empathy!" You mean you actually know every parent? Now THAT'S amazing!

Obviously, you have the whole scenario played out in your head as to what really happened that night........ that's fine. Whatever helps you to sleep better........

I hope for your sake that the day comes when you can put the TM case to rest and move on w/your life..........

 

Once again, you are using belittling and insulting comments toward another poster. . .who is obviously AT LEAST as well educated and "adult" as anyone in this forum.

I, for one, am getting very tired of your constant, border line, insults and your constant put down of ALL libs.

Are you aware that this is against the rules?

 

More belittling comments. By the way. . .where did I say I knew "every parents?"

Would you please show where "I" make "race" a subject in any posts, except when it is to point out that "some" comments are clearly racially based?

And, if you find it so "silly" to debate the Zimmerman case and the follow up story with his marital disaster. . .why do YOU continue to do so? Could it be that you can't get over it?

 

Please provide a link that demonstrate that Trayvon Martin was found to be acting "suspiciously" on the video at the 7/11 store. . .or that the clerk who served him stated in his statement to the court that Martin was acting n a suspicious manner in the store.

The fact that Zimmerman's worshippers find everything about Trayvon Martin "suspicious" and "guilty" doesn't make it so!

 

You mean. . .you never received pictures from friends or family on your phone?
Guess what. . .I get pictures of my grand children, both from Australia and from Arizona at least once a week. . .and I rarely delete them. . .unless save them in my photoshop program on my computer!

And. . .if you read the "crazy" things teenagers post on social media these days. . .you should know that much of it is just "bravado!" This is in fact a good reason for parents to monitor social websites.

But. . .did you see Zimmerman's social websites? I guess the "crazy things" said are not limited to kids. . .it must be dependent on maturity, and apparently, Zimmerman has the maturity of a15 year old bully!

 

then if it was george how come he wasnt caught on twitter,Facebook or any other social media site,friends or other family?

- - - Updated - - -

then if it was george how come he wasnt caught on twitter,Facebook or any other social media site,friends or other family?

 

My god, it's like a cross to a vampire.

What is it about personal responsibility that disgusts liberals so?

Are you saying Trayvon was not responsible for the pics on his phone?

"Kruidbos testified last month that he found embarrassing photos on Martin's phone that included pictures of a clump of jewelry on a bed, underage nude females, marijuana plants and a hand holding a semi-automatic pistol."

http://www.trust.org/item/20130716025224-bjod9

Saint Trayvon indeed, never responsible for his actions.