get your vaccination and your booster shot

You know the old saying," it takes one to know one."

 

Here is another. Not so much a syndrome but actively practised by many. It's called denialism.

 

A new big data study of 145 countries shows COVID vaccines make things worse (cases and deaths)

At-a-Glance

• 
  
  
  • A new study by Kyle A. Beattie entitled “Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A Big Data Analysis of 145 Countries” concluded that vaccines are doing the opposite of what they were promised to do.

• 
  
  
  • Rather than helping us regain our freedoms, the vaccines are associated with higher rates of COVID-19 infections and higher rates of COVID-related deaths. In the US, the vaccines were associated with an increase of 38% in the number of COVID cases per million and an increase of 31% in the number of deaths per million associated with COVID.

• 
  
  
  • Numerous other studies have independently reached the same conclusion. The more you vaccinate, the worse things get.

• 
  
  
  • Beattie concludes: “These results should encourage local policymakers to make decisions based on data, not narrative, and based on local conditions, not global or national mandates”. However, based on past performance it is not expected that health authorities will react to these results in a rational fashion. Rather they will continue pressing their vaccine mandate for all, regardless of age or medical history.

The next time you see you county health officer, President Biden, or Boris Johnson why not ask them if they can find a mistake in this study by Kyle A. Beattie entitled Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries (the PDF version is here).

The study found that the COVID vaccines cause more COVID cases per million (+38% in US) and more deaths per million associated with COVID (+31% in US).

The abstract says:

The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the dependent variables total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policymakers. They indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19-related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment that was originally sold to the public as the “key to gain back our freedoms.” The effect of vaccines on total cases per million and its low positive association with total vaccinations per hundred signifies a limited impact of vaccines on lowering COVID-19-associated cases.

These results should encourage local policymakers to make policy decisions based on data, not narrative, and based on local conditions, not global or national mandates. These results should also encourage policymakers to begin looking for other avenues out of the pandemic aside from mass vaccination campaigns.

In other words, we were lied to

The vaccines are making this worse, not better. This is why we are not getting ourselves out of the hole. Mandating vaccines are making this

This is hardly the first study to reach those conclusions. These studies, all done independently, found the same thing—the more you vaccinate, the worse things get.

1. 
   
   
   • The Lyons-Weiler paper
   • The Harvard study
   • The German study
   • The Denmark study (which shows Dr James was right; you have to boost every 30 days to maintain protection.
   • German government data (this is from The Expose)
   • 80% of the COVID deaths in the UK are vaccinated
   • Lancet: 89% Of New UK COVID Cases Among Fully Vaxxed

Source & more...

 

Experts conclude that STUDENT Kyle A. Beattie **** the bed.

https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...ws-heavy-criticism-from-experts-idUSL1N2TU1SW

A personal, non-peer-reviewed study claiming to reveal the global COVID-19 vaccine rollout has increased deaths and cases of the disease has been cited in some social media posts as comprehensive analysis. However, Reuters presented the piece to data experts, who highlighted several major limitations.

The full study, from which the abstract was widely tweeted via a screenshot, can be found here or as a .pdf here .

One tweet with over 7,000 likes described the analysis as “exhaustive” while Infowars, a conspiracy-theory website and channel, highlighted it in a video segment (here) .

The paper was written by Kyle Beattie, a doctoral student in international relations and comparative politics at the University of Alberta, Canada (kylebeattie.dx.am/, here).

He compared data from a control group of four countries with low vaccination rates – Burkina Faso, Chad, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and South Sudan – to others where vaccine rollouts were far more widespread.

These control group countries “best represent a ‘natural’ progression of the virus with limited vaccine intervention,” he said.

Beattie claimed his research indicated that the global COVID-19 vaccine rollout had “a strong and significant propensity” to increase deaths and cases of the disease. He added that this finding “should be highly worrisome for policy makers”.

Beattie later told Reuters in an email he had written the paper due to his “personal interest in this topic” and had “no assistance or affiliation from my university”.


“This work is my honest attempt to understand broadly what the effect of vaccine administration is as an instituted public policy and whether it has helped countries lower cases or deaths from COVID,” he said.

“I have published this as a preprint on the ResearchGate server in order to show my results, debate them, and hopefully receive constructive criticism on where this methodology can be improved.”

Reuters presented the piece to three experts, all of whom pointed to several issues with the study’s methodology and conclusion, and highlighted how it contradicted results of other widely accepted research.

CRITIQUE FROM EXPERTS
“Overall, I have very low confidence in the results of this analysis,” said Elizabeth Williamson, an associate professor in the Department of Medical Statistics at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM) – adding that the paper took “a very naive approach to an incredibly complex question without discussing the plausibility of the very strong assumptions being made.”

“The study chose to use four countries in Africa as the ‘comparison’, i.e., these countries were used to represent what would have happened in other countries (e.g., Japan, U.S.) had they not introduced the vaccine.

“Whether the synthetic comparison approach used could ever give valid results for COVID vaccine efficacy is not certain in this approach, like all causal methods, relies on untestable assumptions.”

She added: “What I am certain about is that using these four countries as the comparison with every other country is very unlikely to give a sensible answer.”

Agreeing with the critique, Williamson’s colleague, Professor Linda Sharples, the head of LSHTM’s Department of Medical Statistics, said the paper had drawn together “aggregate data from a wide range of very different countries”.


She told Reuters: “First, these countries vary widely in the age distribution of their citizens, geographic, economic and other population characteristics, not to mention their different strategies for testing for COVID and different vaccination programs.

“Combining data in this case is fraught with difficulty and likely to be misleading.”

Also referring to untestable assumptions, she added: “Obviously, we don’t know what would have happened if we had done something different to what we actually did. If we have a lot of detailed information about each individual, then we can lessen the influence of these very strong assumptions, but we can’t make their effect disappear completely.”

Reuters also spoke to John Whittaker, the director of the MRC Biostatistics Unit (BSU) and professor of Biostatistics at the University of Cambridge, who echoed the comments from Williamson and Sharples.

“We need these controls to be ‘exchangeable’ with the [vaccine] intervention period/countries, i.e., to believe they are similar enough to give reasonable predictions of what would have happened without intervention (the counterfactual). I don’t believe either assumption here.”

Commenting specifically on the choice of the four control countries, Whittaker said this “amounts to saying that vaccines were harmful in France because Chad reported very low rates of deaths and cases over the entire pandemic period”.

All three experts told Reuters that conclusions would be better drawn from looking at evidence from randomised trials, as well as other data and analysis.

“We have a lot of data now from randomised trials and associated studies that means we don’t have to rely on these methods, and these trials give us a different, more evidence-based picture,” Sharples said, summing up the consensus.

“From these, I have confidence in the effectiveness of vaccination.”

 

A know CT and anti vaxer site.

You are doing great..........................

 

So are you...

 

And now childish gifs

you are just doing great

 

Pretty much all he does. He belongs at the Algonquin Table.

 

It will be another month before I'm elgible for the fourth shot.

Not being stupid or suicidal, I'll be getting it.

Needless to say, Tucker Carlson is vaccinated. Everyone at FOX News is vaccinated. All Republican congressmen are vaccinated. Heck, that crowd was elbowing widows aside to get to the front of the line. For money and power, they're telling their followers to not get vaccinated. Then they're laughing hard when those followers die of COVID, as they so often do.

 

It's neither here nor there. Godspeed to you all. I won't be there for the afterparty. I'll be one of the minority cleaning up the mess. Toodles.

 

Ever wonder what is in that crap they call "COVID vaccines"

COVID-19 Vaccine Ingredients

On 20 August 2021 Dr. Robert Young published his team’s findings after analysing the four dominant COVID-19 “vaccines” using Phase Contrast Microscopy, Transmission and Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy. Their findings both confirm and expand upon the prior investigations carried out by Dr. Pablo Campra (University of Almeria, Spain), Dr. Juan F. Gastón Añaños (Hospital de Barbastro, Spain), and later ones by Dr. Martín Monteverde (Argentina), Dr. Matt Shelton (New Zealand), a British Laboratory, as well as the pathology reports from autopsies of vaccinated deceased which were carried out by Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt, Prof. Dr. Walter Lang and Prof. Dr. Peter Schirmacher (Germany & Austria), and as reported by Maria Zeee (Australia).

Many of these substances were observed as being bonded to graphene oxide and metallic nanoparticles. GO nanoparticles are necrotic, able to pass into or through physiological barriers including (but not limited to) the blood-air barrier, the blood-testis barrier, the blood-brain barrier, and the blood-placenta barrier. Over a period of several months after intramuscular injection, as much as 75% of the GO nanoparticle “delivery platform”, and most of the substances listed below, are transported extensively throughout the bodies of mammals, into the blood, brain and other organs. Some of the many toxic effects of graphene oxide are myocarditis and blood clotting. Contamination in vaccines appears to be so common that one might be forgiven for thinking that it is deliberate.

 

Dr Robert Young -- where are these team findings published? I found some interesting tidbits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_O._Young

1. Young, who is not a medical doctor, has received doctorates for naturopathy and nutrition from Clayton College of Natural Health (formerly American College of Holistic Nutrition), a defunct correspondence school which was not accredited by any agency recognized by the U.S. Department of Education.
2. He got his diploma from a diploma mill.
3. Has been charged with multiple felony charges for practicing medicine without a licence.
4. In 2014, he declared in a plea agreement that he is not "a microbiologist, hematologist, medical doctor, naturopathic doctor, or trained scientist".
5. In November 2018 he was ordered to pay US $105 million to a cancer patient who had sued him for claiming to be a doctor and advising her to forgo traditional medical treatment.

Why should we believe anything this man claims?

More about him here -- https://quackwatch.org/11ind/young3/

There isn't any graphene oxide in covid vaccines --

https://www.logically.ai/factchecks/library/9949b856
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-graphene-lipidvaccines-idUSL1N2PI2XH
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucel...he-latest-unsupported-claims/?sh=66454f4c74d7
https://www.politifact.com/factchec...19-vaccines-do-not-contain-graphene-are-not-/
https://www.thejournal.ie/debunked-covid-19-vaccines-lead-graphene-oxide-5533363-Aug2021/
https://observers.france24.com/en/science/20210811-covid-19-vaccine-graphene-videos-debunked
https://fullfact.org/health/graphene-oxide-vaccines-oct-2021/
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-430816913228

Actual Ingredients of the Vaccines:

Of course, none of these people even considered toxicity and the amount of graphene oxide that would have to be added to vaccines to cause adverse effects.

https://health-desk.org/articles/how-do-we-know-graphene-oxide-isn-t-used-in-covid-19-mrna-vaccines

If there was graphene oxide in covid19 vaccines (there definitely isn't) the amount that would be in the vaccines would be so small that it would not be toxic to human cells. There have been some studies done on mice which showed no obvious toxicity at low to middle doses of .1 to .25mg. At doses of .4mg, it was chronically toxic and was found to deposit in the lungs, spleen, liver, and kidneys. "It is important to note that this .4 mg of graphene oxide is proportionally much greater in mice than it would be in humans, considering their size and biological differences."

One of the links goes to https://www.orwell.city/2021/07/graphene-oxide-found-in-vaxigrip-tetra-vaccination-vial.html

This website is full of ridiculous crazy articles -- Black-eyed babies being born due to genetic mutations caused by the vaccines. I have seen quite a few babies born to vaccinated parents and none have this black-eye mutation. Could just be fake news generated by using an app that can change appearance

A zombie apocalypse could be created through graphene and the technology that goes into vaccines.
https://www.orwell.city/2022/02/zombies.html

https://www.orwell.city/2021/12/sparks.html

Social distancing might actually be to avoid electromagnetic clashes between individuals
This hypothesis postulates that the covert motive behind the social distancing would be to prevent the electromagnetic fields emitted by the inoculants from interacting with each other.

There is a lot more of that crazy stuff on the website. I really worry about people who believe this stuff.

 

What everyone who reports on such news fails to leave out one specific detail, that is 'vaccine', died of COVID vaccine. And those that die of the flu, which is dressed up in drag by MSM as COVID are the elderly and people with compromised immunities due to their comorbidities. Ever consider that?
Or how about healthy young people who have had the clot shots, in particular, sports people dropping dead on the field. In their prime and in peak physical condition. I wonder.

 

Prove it!

 

Friend just texted me and said he has a Bell's Palsy after the booster. Thing about him is that he'll take the fourth shot when it's his turn.

Not me, I'm done.

 

Yes, the Demonrat party totally was against the Vaccine, that's correct.

LOL

 

So what you're suggesting is that they want their followers to die.

You didn't think that through far enough, did you?

Nah, that's not crazy or anything.

 

All that shizz is used to discredit those who are concerned for the right reason. Then when you bring up your concerns, like my friend who got Bell's Palsy, or a family member with Myocarditis, the sleep walking amongst us will cite these crazy theories and associated it with you...and I'm vaxxed to boot. It doesn't stop them from not being able to differentiate the information properly.

 

Do you also wonder when Trump will get charged with tax evasion?

 

Bells Palsy is a major side effect reported.. And both parties WANTED a vaccine shot to give to their people.

No way in Hell is or was the Dems against it... Have you been asleep? .

 

That was tongue in cheek.

They tried to cast a doubt on it just before the election results to dismiss Trump's claim of "warp speed" but after that they took credit for it. None of that was lost on me. Politicians changing with the direction of the wind? Who knew!!

 

Young is a very reputable doc, just NOT mainstream standard medicine....Many good wise docs have lost
their licenses for what they believe and practice....it's a crime...

 

~ Why believe anything that our government officials tell us ? They lied about COVID. They lied about Russia collusion. They lied about the Ukraine impeachment trial. They continue to lie about Co2 catastrophe and the Hunter Biden debacle .
I suppose some just enjoy being stupefied. It's easy ... '

 

That's the game.

These are nothing but gangsters (a Criminal Club at the top of the pyramid) who are robbing the U.S. Treasury of trillions of taxpayer dollars by disguising themselves as "concerned" politicians.

And how do they get away with it?

It's easy.

All the two political parties do is create totally insane "non-sense issues" to keep all the rubes distracted by using their big six corporate owned media companies.

While everybody is picking sides and hating on one another with their daily scripted shtick of "Good Cop ~ Bad Cop", instead of focusing on their constant theft of our nation, these scumbags are enriching themselves to the hilt.

It's akin to a daily magic-act where the Magician uses a beautiful and scantly clad assistant in eye catching attire to distract the audience, while he pulls off his con, and then convinces most of the rubes that it's magic.

 

I love you two::Navy and California. You both are so wise and what a way with words. So glad
you both are here and that I found this forum and you 2.