GUILTY: Scared Democrats Begin Accusing Vote Fraud Whistleblowers of ‘Sedition and Treason’

Some of them witnessed direct vote fraud like in the Spanish speaking polling place where poll workers were telling voters to vote for Biden.

 

And those cases should be investigated - but using a few incidences of possible voting irregularities to toss the entire state's election is
asinine.

 

Nothing will get investigated. Too much money involved. Zuckerberg spent 1/2 billion in states with stipulations how to spend it.

 

Like I said - "proof" for Trump supporters = "I read it on the internet, so it must be true ...".

 

Not fond of facts are you.

 

The Democrats cheated with early morning data dumps and spikes and mail in voting. Nothing you say will change our mind on this.

 

Makes total sense. LOL

 

“Vast right wing conspiracy.”

God I miss that woman. Has she crawled out of that box of Chardonnay yet?

 

Shouldn’t we all want to know if somebody put their thumb on that scale, though? Or thumbs.

 

Well so far all the court cases have been thrown out, so what evidence?

 

Yep, and we have found that no one has.

 

Depending on your perspective, some might say we haven't looked very hard...

Half of Americans: "what is that thing with webbed feet saying 'quack quack'?"

Half of Americans: "Well I can assure it isn't a duck! Let's not find out..."

 

Perhaps we are just exhausted with the sheer volume of claims turning out to be baseless.

Ex #1: Thread is created talking about mathematical proof that Biden could not have won. Upon actual inspection of the claim, it is found that the article relies upon very obviously faulty data to mislead the reader.

Ex #2: In another thread you cite the forensic audit of Dominion machines coming out with a 68% error rate being way above the acceptable rate of 0.0008%. I spent a long night personally investigating this claim, and illustrated how it is false.

Ex #3: Claim that NYT contains data that Dominion machines across the country tens of thousands of votes from Trump to other candidates, including tens of thousands in GA. I wasted some time personally investigating this one as well, and illustrate how the methodology and data set used are unreliable. Then GA releases hand recount in a few days coming to a very similar number, reinforcing the idea that Dominion machines could not have really been material as GA is all paper ballots this year.

Ex #4: Claim that video evidence from Fulton County GA shows fraudulent ballots counted after observers left. I also spent a while examining it, and came to the conclusion that the video evidence presented does not confirm this. It is still cited even on this thread as obvious evidence of fraud even when poster positing this statement is presented with investigator's showing video of how the ballots were placed there to begin with.

Ex #5: Claim that some Instagram by a poll worker in GA shows fraud due to the assumption she is performing signature matching without observers present. Again, something I bothered to look up to see if it was even required by GA law, and as it turns out, there is no GA statute saying observers play a part in signature verification.

Ex #6: Poster presents claim of voter fraud ring being caught as evidence of fraud in 2020 election, but as I point out after actually checking the article, cites a 2018 article on fraud in the 2016 D primary in TX.

Ex #7: James Toupis makes claims in the recent Senate hearing about malfeasance. I waste an evening investigating every single claims he makes in his opening statements, and posted my findings on each. Upon inspection of the actual court documents, I find he did not allege fraud in even one of the cases, uses statements in the Senate hearing that are misleading. His closer for the 170K ballots that should not have been counted is entirely without merit, as was found by the court, and not argued by the dissent.

One might be excused for starting to see all of the accusations of fraud as frivolous considering how many hours must be wasted sifting through all of them to even find one that pans out. The fact that so many fall apart under scrutiny is evidence of the weakness in the case for fraud. It is abundantly clear from anyone looking at this from a neutral perspective that the quantity of purported evidence will convince Trump supporters regardless of their quality, but nobody else due to its lack thereof.

 

The lefty judges will not allow evidence.....but there is plenty if you look.

 

All the judges, and the evidence was presented. Two falsehoods in one sentence.

 

You know some of those judges were put there by trump, are they lefty's?

 

Some? LOL!

 

No evidence was allowed.

 

Are they leftys?

 

Wrong.

 

Only in your head was no evidence allowed.

 

Is there any evidence for that claim?

Also, what about the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Justice's investigations into voter fraud?

I mean, it's one thing to demand recounts, audits, investigations, and court hearings.. but it's another thing entirely to demand all of those things and then not accept the results

 

Actually, if you read the court rulings yourself rather than rely on Rudy Giuliani for your information, in every instance the Trump legal team has failed to provide sufficient evidence of mass voter fraud. Whether the judges have been Democrat, Republican, or even judges appointed by Trump himself, their rulings have been unanimous in saying there is no evidence of mass voter fraud. There's a reason for that

Every investigator at the state and federal level has also been unanimous as well, even the Attorney General William Barr who was appointed by Trump himself said there is no evidence of mass voter fraud.

 

That LOL is starting to sound more and more desperate and hysterical. There's a pill for that.

 

Hard to prove anything when evidence is never heard due to standing and laches.