Gun Show Loophole exposed <<MOD WARNING ISSUED>>

<<MODERATOR"S WARNING- This thread was issued a moderator's warning on March 12th at 8:47 PDT. Insults, off topic flamebaiting, baiting and taunting, and discussing each other can and will be treated as if you already had a formal warning. If any more instances of rule infractions occur, thread bans and warnings with points can be issued as if you have already received a zero point warning.>>

'Crowder proving idiots like HCD wrong once again.'

Sometimes the ignorance,hysteria and gun control propaganda is more amusing (and discouraging) on video.


Source: https://defensemaven.io/bluelivesma...-wanna-watch-this-one-GaEJGz64x0CYiDfbs-hEHg/

 

Thanks for the video. The "Gun Show Loophole" meme is simply ant-gun language for banning private sales of guns. California is often used for a model for this goal. If the anti-gun left had their way, no American father could give their 12 year old a single shot .22 rifle for Christmas without traipsing their kid down for fingerprints and a background check. Of course, this whole action is just one step closer to confiscation. Can't confiscate if the Feds don't know who has the guns, eh?

 

The gun show or private sale loophole needs to be closed. It already is closed in countries with low gun deaths

 

Called it.

 

Yeah me too. Long ago. Lol

 

They 'closed' it in WA State years ago. It costs taxpayers around $10M/yr and has netted one total conviction to date. That conviction was after the prohobited person shot someone, of course, so it cant even be demonstrated to have saved one life.

Gun laws don't work the same here as in other countries because our culture isn't the same as in other countries.

 

Another anti-gun excretory thread. You people are losing credibility faster than Africans are invading Spain right now.

 

It is not about convictions. It is about prevention. Gun control DOES work in the US when done effectively

 

It's not a loophole, it's an intentional part of the law.

 

Then, if you are honestly looking for prevention, allowing people to carry IS prevention. More guns are used to stop criminals than criminals getting away with what they want says the CDC.
https://thenationalsentinel.com/201...s-used-much-more-for-self-defense-than-crime/

 

If that were the case we would be the safest country in the world instead of having a gun death rate 25 times higher than other developed countries

 

So are tax loopholes. It is a work around which is a loophole

 

We are, if you get rid of the places with the highest gun control legislation like Chicago and Detroit and DC. But hey, we are already dropping even with more guns being sold, so yeah. Thanks for proving our point.

 

Loophole implies an ambiguity in the law, which can be misused. This isn't a loophole, it's an intention.

 

Its a loop hole that needs to be fixed

 

25 TIMES

 

I must've forgotten to mention that the $10M/yr that WA spends on MBC's can't be shown to have decreased any gun crime, either.

 

Can the billions spent by the TSA be proven to reduce hijackings?

 

If so, not by nearly enough to justify the money we spend on them.

 

Then work on that and get back to me

 

I am

 

Probably not, as the TSA fails to find weapons in test runs about 70% of the time (to do the inverse, that means they succeed finding the test weapons/bombs 30% of the time).

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/tsa-screenings-fail-to-detect-explosives-guns-knives-70-percent/

 

Yeah....get to work on that

 

This was the discussion that was in progress months ago when you were banned.
There is no loophole. You lost the arguement then, and nothing has changed.
Why don't you reiterate what you call the 'Gun Show' loophole and be educated again.

 

The private sale or gun show loophole is so big you can drive a truck thru it.