There is a lot of money and considerable power at stake going forward with the bandwagon issue of man made global warming. The fact there is no evidence of global warming for decades doesn't seem to slow down the advocates. Not surprising considering the majority of the money is behind the true believers. The Weather Channel founder sees the issue differently from many of his peers who clearly see the dollar signs. http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-...nder-Hello-Everybody-Theres-No-Global-Warming
OVER the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earths surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar. The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO2 put there by humanity since 1750.
Science is the enemy! . don't listen to the man behind the curtain. said the wizard of oz who was the man behind the curtain.
If you can convince governments to blame the people for the weather then you then you can force them to do anything you want. Man made global warming is the perfect tool for global totalitarianism and the supreme weapon for the destruction of individual freedom and national sovereignty.
You understand that's a particularly crazy conspiracy theory, right? If you don't, consider yourself informed now.
Thank you kindly for informing me that I am crazy. You know crazy people; they're always the last to know. Sorry it took so long to respond; I was hiding incandescent light bulbs.:
Oh right, We see those millionaire climate scientists on the beach at St. Tropez all the time. (NOT!) There is a lot of money in this, but it's being spent by Big Oil and Big Coal, trying to convice suckers like you that it's all a hoax. It's just to bad that they succeeded in your case. Luckily, not everyone is as gullible as you are. When you say "decades" I assume that you mean 20 years or more. And when you say "no evidence", I assume that you have missed every single one of the following lines of evidence: 1. The 20-year trend for GISS global surface temp is up. 2. The 20-year trend for HADCRUT4 global surface temp is up. 3. The 20-year trend for UAH global troposphere temp is up. 4. The 20-year trend for RSS global troposphere temp is up. 5. The 20-year trend for global ocean heat content is up. 6. The 20-year trend for Greenland ice is down. 7. The 20-year trend for Antarctic ice is down. And I could go on (and on and on), but clearly you are not the slightest bit embarrassed by your own ignorance, so why should I? If you don't count the billions behind the denial movement ... which clearly you don't ... because hey, when you've bought and paid for your own TV network, you expect to get your money's worth of propaganda. And they have. Oh, you mean that guy who isn't a meteorologist, isn't a scientist, and has a degree in journalism and who pretends to be knowledgeable? The guy that The Weather Channel itself has publicly pwned? Yeah, right. I bet you're a flat-earther too.
This seems overly emotional. Emotion is not as relevant to science as it is to religion. One must view one's world with objectivity and a questioning mind. Convincing evidence is lacking. Consensus is suspect based on the love of money being the root of all evil.
Welcome aboard. Yes there is, whether it is manmade is still up for debate, but Global Warming is real and happening.
There is scant undisputed data that can produce a valid verifiable correlation between the activities of man and the claim of rising global temperatures. In my opinion anthropogenic global warming* is an fabricated device that exists to generate funds, manipulate nations, and to indenture citizens and their children. Its especially embarrassing to live in a so called free country whos scientific community and President supports the fraud of the century otherwise known as global warming anthropogenic global warming. foot note ; *anthropogenic global warming. Is the claim that mans activities cause global warming and other climate change. Reva aka Mr. Mellow Dramatic (lol) ~Hey I got to practice my preaching somewhere!
If your "science" relies on conspiracy theory for it to make sense then it is not science. Same goes for Flat Earthers, Creationists and UFO enthusiasts.
even if there WAS proof that humans are responsible, HOW are you going to get the 3rd world to stop using coal and wood, burning off forest, etc? it's not us that are doing the majority of the harm. If the first world's part of it stopped completely, the harm would continue So why are you (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)ing about US, hmm? How about poor people just STOP having kids? After 3 generations, there'd be no more poor people. It's very simple, really. If you can't provide for your own retirement, thru your investments, then you SHOULD just perish, instead of being a burden on everyone else. What's so effing special about YOU, anyway?
Of course there is global warming (or maybe you don't believe in thermometers). The only issue yet to be decided is whether or not that global warming is man-made.
Nah, drought and crop failure and mass hunger are the supreme weapon for the destruction of individual freedom and national sovereignty. See, I can use high-sounding tritisms just like you. See how free you feel after going without your corn for five days. Then see if you give a (*)(*)(*)(*) about national sovereignty.
By leading by example. Once almost the whole world is on board, the world can slam any non-complying nation with sanctions and tariffs, forcing them to comply. However, if the USA would say "well, China's not on board, so we're not on board!", that just guarantees nothing happens. Hence, the USA has to lead. As far as wood-burning goes, you work on distributing off-the-grid technologies to reduce the need for wood-burning.
The hysterical warming alarmists believe in promissory global warming. If it ain't doing it now, or for the past 17 years, they are promising it will do it in the future. So, we need to hurt economies, which means making more people suffer in these bad economic times, by making fossil fuel energy much more expensive so we won't use it, by various means and measures. Most of these hysterical people are not working people, and have relatively safe jobs that won't be offshored to places that will not constrict their economies, like china. Or said differently, their bellies are full and will remain that way, so they don't have to worry about where their next meal will come from. If these measures that they demand would actually be felt in a bad way by themselves, they wouldn't be hysterical. Obama and those nuts on the left will not suffer one bit, just the people who are already having a hard time. When Obama said years ago that his climate change fixes would make your electric bill go up a lot, he knew he wouldn't have to worry about paying his own, nor would those dems who are not working people, for they could pay any rate that would be charged. No skin in the game.
My baseline electricity rate has already jumped from $0.08 kWh to $0.13 kWh and is going to get hiked next year to $.015 kWh.
Ugh....don't even get me going. I was talking to witless liberal type the other day, and he simply could not conceive of how the "great light bulb" fiasco really plays as simply as yet another tax grab, using "green" fear. LOL. I explained to him, very slowly a second time. Ummmm. There are about 35 million people in Canada. The government passed regulation saying we all have to change to these types of light bulbs. Well, that would be about 20 million Canadians (not including businesses) each buying approximately 10 (fairly expensive) light bulbs each for around there homes, garages, cottages etc. I'm like...ahhh, you do understand there is TAX on all those bulbs...right? Right.....freakin dimbulb. /sigh. Can't fix stupid I guess.
