Hope Hicks won't answer questions about the White House in congressional interview

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Egoboy, Jun 19, 2019.

  1. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What a sexist comment....
     
    glitch likes this.
  2. Esperance

    Esperance Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2017
    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    4,379
    Trophy Points:
    113

    All about more intimidation...

    You will notice that Sonny Perdue, William Barr, Mike Pompeo, and others are telling the Dems to cut bait.

    Nope, won't put a Trump 2020 bumper sticker on my car.
    But I sure will put them over Biden and Bernie bumper stickers and watch the vandalism.
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2019
    patentlymn and drluggit like this.
  3. Crownline

    Crownline Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2016
    Messages:
    6,472
    Likes Received:
    6,537
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That post wasn’t creepy. Nope, not at all.
     
    Reality and Thought Criminal like this.
  4. Esperance

    Esperance Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2017
    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    4,379
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True, unless it comes before a liberal, no ethics, judge. There are plenty of those near DC.
     
  5. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,671
    Likes Received:
    32,409
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :roflol:

    Please spare me the hyper-hypocritical PC BS.:bored:

    From the posts that I read daily from the RW, Trump Supporters are all about being Non-PC.

    Sorry if you took offense.

    Still, if Hope Hicks (and Trump) really wanted Transparency--Hope would be testifying in Open Session.

    Instead of...



    Carry on, and I hope you continue to enjoy your time at PF.:salute:
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2019
    Egoboy likes this.
  6. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hope spoke with Mueller and his team for hours,

    And hours of testimony to the House back in 2018....

    There is no need for anymore testimony....the transparency has been overwhelming....the left just can't find anything
     
    glitch likes this.
  7. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's called a full transcript... a sorry substitute to be sure, but it's what we have in the transparent presidency of Donald J. Obstructionist...
     
  8. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The president has no control over how the House Dems conduct their hearings.
     
  9. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And not even his daughter, so no problems on that front....
     
  10. HB Surfer

    HB Surfer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2009
    Messages:
    34,707
    Likes Received:
    21,899
    Trophy Points:
    113
    lol... the House of Representatives does not lord over the Executive Branch. Who didn't know this was going to happen?

    What President would allow his staff, or former staff, to be abused by partisan lying *******s like Adam Schiff and Ted Lieu?
     
  11. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Well, then who was Nadler negotiating with in the following sentence??

    The Judiciary panel wanted a higher-profile interview with Hicks, subpoenaing her for public testimony. But they agreed to the private interview after negotiations.

    The fact that they have to negotiate is an obstructive act in and of itself.... I'm beginning to see Nancy's strategy. By the time she does open the impeachment hearing in September, the entire country will be aware that Trump and his WH are fighting every legitimate request with illegitimate tools.

    As long as they are prepared for a summer of frustration, I can see the long game angle here...
     
  12. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hope Hicks and her attorneys.

    Negotiating is OOJ...hahahahaha

    Ya'll are seeing that everywhere....just like you did with the Russians...prior to the Mueller Report
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2019
  13. Pred

    Pred Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    24,409
    Likes Received:
    17,393
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why should she talk when a bunch of people who knew a crap load about Hillary's inner sanctum, all pleaded the 5th and politely slinked away never to be heard from again? Would have been nice to know who specifically bashed all those phones and why? How about which people deleted all that data? Would have be nice to know.
     
  14. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And to continue your learning curve, who are "and her attorneys"?? From the OP, they are WH attorneys so the entire thing is WH directed, which is decidedly odd for a private citizen...
     
  15. HTownMarine

    HTownMarine Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2013
    Messages:
    8,348
    Likes Received:
    4,155
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Honestly, I'd just tell them to **** off.
     
  16. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,671
    Likes Received:
    32,409
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Have you ever considered submitting your resume to the Trump Administration?
     
    Last edited: Jun 19, 2019
  17. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No she has her own private attorney. The WH Attorney is merely objecting to questions in regards to communications in the WH.

    The President has no authority and does not tell the House when and how to conduct hearings....they are a seperate branch of Govt.
     
  18. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    upload_2019-6-19_14-59-41.png
     
  19. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,671
    Likes Received:
    32,409
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you find that to be such a scintillating discussion topic, then maybe you should start a new thread.

    Instead of derailing/posting off-topic in this Hope Hicks thread.

    Nothing personal, just a friendly suggestion.

    Best of luck on whatever you decide.:salute:
     
  20. Jestsayin

    Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    16,798
    Likes Received:
    17,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please democrats keep up your useless pattern. You are losing the battle. Your time would be better spent coaching your Presidential pick, Michael Avvanetti. He has lots of questions to answer.
     
    icehole3 likes this.
  21. struth

    struth Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2018
    Messages:
    33,519
    Likes Received:
    17,956
    Trophy Points:
    113
  22. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,184
    Likes Received:
    39,247
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And would quickly be stayed and lost on appeals.
     
  23. Egoboy

    Egoboy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2017
    Messages:
    44,763
    Likes Received:
    32,099
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I wouldn't bet on that... there's nothing in the law backing up what Trump is trying to do...
     
  24. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,184
    Likes Received:
    39,247
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Are you unaware that the Executive and Congressional branches are co-equal branches? Are you unaware of a thingy called executive privilege long held a constitutional granted privilege of the executive branch against unwarranted and unauthorized Congressional intrusions? And negotiation is now obstruction, when did the Congress become the Imperial Congress? When did the President start working for the Congress?
     
    glitch likes this.
  25. Bluesguy

    Bluesguy Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    154,184
    Likes Received:
    39,247
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I would and there are decades of precedent along with the Constitutional separation of powers. Do you think Trump can demand Pelosi's chief of staff come to his office and tell them everything said in private deliberations with her?
     
    glitch and Thought Criminal like this.

Share This Page