House committee votes to upend first D.C. law in 23 years

LOL, right out of the 19th century Women and Birth Control are Evil, godsy said so...LOL

Very sick and hateful that religious freaks ONLY want health care for MEN and don't give a damn what happens to women ..but their long history of hating women and RAPING CHILDREN is well known.

 

How about females can pay for their own healthcare like anyone else..

Healthcare for men? men don't get a damn thing - as a matter of fact most men don't even know they can get breast cancer, yet of course you have all kinds of charities and organizations dedicated to womans health and none for men....

But yeah I suppose asking people to pay for their own constraception is HATING WOMAN AND RAPING KIDS.

No the reall rapists are the progressives teaching 5-year-olds about what grown homoseuxal men do in the bedroom at night and how great it is.

 

What an ignorant , and religious, load of horse poop.....


DUH, women DO pay for health care INSURANCE like everyone else, only a dolt would think they want it for free ......

 

This has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with progressives believing woman are entitled to FREE baby blockers - a product insurance didn't cover before.

Let me ask you this - should insurance cover condoms?

 

Yeah, I hate my mom, sisters and wife, and nothing makes me happier than seeing pre schoolers raped.

Dude, you're sick. Very, very sick.

 

This has everything to do with Misogynistic religious freaks who hate the ide that woman have complete health care coverage...just because you think women are evil and don't deserve health care doesn't mean they don't.

Pregnancy IS a health issue. Birth Control methods are prescribed by doctors, Women go to doctors when they are pregnant. Why? It's a health issue.

I'd like to have men and priests pay for their own Viagra to pay for their perversions, but I bet insurance companies pay for that and Catholics don't care ...afterall , to them, it's for the Important sex....

 

Well, you describe love a whole lot differently than I do....If I love someone I would want them to have the best health care...you, and religious freaks , don't.

And religions history is on my side when it comes to claiming their sociopathic hatred of women. (and they DO prefer little boys)

 

First where in the bill does it say the employer can fire someone for using birth control and second how wouldnthe employer know?

 

It doesnt its more misinformation /fake outrage to push the dead "War on Women".

 

Employers should be able to fire employees for ANY reason just as employees can quit for ANY reason. Freedom, a dirty word today.

 

It's this kind of BS is why they'll lose the Presidential election in 2016. Pubbies can't help themselves, give them a bit of power in Congress and they can't help but abuse it and American's will realize the mistake they made of giving them the majority. Changes are a coming

 

Nothing to do with religion? From the OP : "The rare congressional effort to turn back a local law pleased social conservatives who view the measure as a threat to religious organizations"""

Women are NOT asking for free anything.

 

YOUR ranty: """Healthcare for men? men don't get a damn thing - as a matter of fact most men don't even know they can get breast cancer, yet of course you have all kinds of charities and organizations dedicated to womans health and none for men.... """"


Care to show proof that men pay for health insurance and get nothing.

Care to show proof that all men don't know they can get breast cancer?

Care to show proof that there are ONLY charities for women's health and none for men?


NO, you can't....wail on...whine on.....

 

You are out of your element donny. Not only do men receive no patient cost coverages as part of hc insurance minimum coverage, this topic has nothing to do with hc insurance.

 

this would have worked in the early 1900s, but in 2015 all the power is in the hands of ownership and corporations so the "market" wont' be sort out - it will just become the willing slave of the richest and most powerful - it already is.

 

Bill 20-790 which includes witness testimony in which employees were fired for reproductive decisions they made. Should an employer be able to fire employees because they conceived using invitro? The catholics say yes!

 

from the article:

With the bill overturned they now can. If you disagree, please show the protection in place that would not allow such discrimination to take place.

 

Employers should be able to fire people for any reason, or even no reason.

Imagine if you ran a company and someone who you wanted gone for any reason at all- was using some law against you so you couldn't kick them out?

The employer has the right to hire, they have the right to fire. Simple as that. If you are an employer you have the same power- but no, the trappings of state involvement trying to put its own version of morality into business has to screw it up.

If an employer has no right to fire who they want for any reason, there's also absolutely no reason why some random off the street can't demand they be hired. Those two rights are inseparable and the absence of one is the absence of the other.

You don't like the company, don't work there. Don't try and push your own version of morality or immorality- the bitter irony, that America built itself on exactly the attitude that I've mentioned above, only to have it torn down by quasi-socialists who believe "the people" should control business rather than "the capitalist". You're no different to the Communists- economic masterminds... that is, in collapsing economies.

 

Nice Pro- Racist/Sexist Discrimination rant !



You: ""Don't try and push your own version of morality or immorality- ""



Which is what religion is trying to do.

It is what Anti-Abortion-Choicers do.

 

This right here is the point.

In addition, a Christian business - or even a Church which hires a secretary - should have the right to refuse to employ someone who engages in behaviors which contradict their own beliefs.

ESPN and other media branches have morality clauses in their own contracts; any employer should be able to avoid association with whomever they want at any time.

Is this another 'liberals caught lying' thread again? Sure appears like it. There isn't news here. There is a political agenda which isn't telling the truth about the real variables involved here.

 

Link and the exact provisions that says an employer can fire an employee because they use birth control and how would they even know? And give me the case of the Catholic church firing and employee for using invitro.

 

Hypocrisy. Your side is trying to force your lifestyles on employers. Stick your big nose back out of it; take several steps back, and try to employ the grey matter that Gaia or whateverTF thing you believe in provided you.

Rayne made no reference whatsoever to either race OR gender. Rayne was defending the right of EACH INDIVIDUAL to protect their OWN morality through Free Association.

For you to think that your version of what is moral should trump your EMPLOYER's notion is pure totalitarianism.

Do you really need to be led around by the nose on this? If you think that the EMPLOYER should have YOUR morality imposed upon them (admit that you want that; you want the EMPLOYER to pay for your abortions/birth control/etc), then give us an example of where you'd want YOUR morality trumped by someone else's.

You, after all, claim to want to avoid having YOUR version of morality pushed, right?

Tell us all about it.

 

Hey Liberals!

If you want our 2nd Amendment right to carry a gun to end at the door of a private establishment (and it should: it is the right of the property holder to determine rules there), why do you think that your rights to your own morality not end at that same door?

You have a right to use birth control. You do not have a right to do so in an employers place of business.

Try not to be rank hypocrites again, ok?

 

So the bill doesn't say what was claimed then. The fact is birth control had nothing to do with the opposition other than forcing funding for it, the bills also required employers pay for elective abortions didn't it.

So why the misrepresentations as to what the is REAL issue with the bill.

 

The difference of course is no one is firing you because you OWN a gun. You want the right to fire someone for using birth control.

Try not to be too ignorant.