They are never pro life. They anti abortion anti women sites. I have met few so called pro lifers that actually were. Most of them are like Whaler all about controlling women and their rights.
You missed this link: http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/ABC_Research/index.htm This link leads to numerous published scientific studies (and their links) dealing with the abortion/breast cancer link. As far as Karen Malec, she is President of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer. Biography of Karen Malec: Karen Malec has been the president of the Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer since 1999. She authored an article for the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, "The Abortion-Breast Cancer Link: How Politics Trumped Science and Informed Consent," which was published in the summer 2003 issue. At the 60th Meeting of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons on September 19, 2003, she delivered a speech concerning the government's cover-up of the abortion-breast cancer link. Her speech was entitled, "Perversion of Science by Politics: Case Study - Informed Consent." She authored, organized and developed most of the coalitions Web site, www.AbortionBreastCancer.com, while relying on the advice of two medical advisers: an endocrinologist, Professor Joel Brind, Ph.D., author of the only quantitative and comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the abortion-breast cancer research; and an internist, Chris Kahlenborn, M.D., author of the book, Breast Cancer: Its Link to Abortion and the Birth Control Pill. The Web site has been described by Dr. Brind, as, "THE clearinghouse for up-to-date information on scientific, medical, political and legal fronts." She has given lectures on the abortion-breast cancer research at U.S. and European conferences and has given countless interviews to newspaper and magazine journalists and radio talk show hosts. She has testified twice before the Illinois Senate Executive Committee in support of task force to investigate abortion-breast cancer link - a measure which was bitterly opposed by the National Organization for Women, the American Civil Liberties Union, Planned Parenthood, and abortion supporters in the Illinois legislature. In June 2001, she attended the United Nations Conference on the Rights of the Child as an accredited journalist for Salem Radio Network. While at the United Nations conference, she participated in a panel discussion of the abortion-breast cancer link with Dr. Brind and Australian attorney, Charles Francis. Mr. Francis won the world's first known settlements of two medical malpractice lawsuits filed against abortion providers who did not inform their patients about the increased risk of breast cancer. Mrs. Malec writes press releases for the coalition and news articles for Abortion-Breast Cancer News Headlines, a newsletter published by the coalition. She has authored many articles about the abortion-breast cancer link for Republicans for a Fair Media's internet wire service, RFM News; Illinois Leader; and other internet news outlets. Mrs. Malec spent eight years teaching in public schools. She is a thirteen year survivor of colon cancer.
You need to get out more. I am a woman, and no one controls me Perhaps you should check out this site as well: Feminists for Life: http://www.feministsforlife.org/index.htm REFUSE TO CHOOSE® WOMEN DESERVE BETTER® THAN ABORTION © Copyright 2011 Feminists for Life. All rights reserved. S2
I doubt you're pro life. You may be anti abortion but chances are you're in the same fence sitting league as whaler. I will look at that link.
In response to your links. Your anti abortion link. http://articles.latimes.com/2007/apr/24/science/sci-abortion24 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abortion–breast_cancer_hypothesis http://pushingrope.blogspot.com/2007/10/who-is-karen-malec.html Like I said your links are meaningless as they are biased and heavily slanted and even altered to show links which do not exist. Maybe you and Whaler can get together and make one big thread about misinformation on abortion.
The facts are there and I bet you aren't pro life. I just posted the facts in a different post that followed. Your links are filled with lies. That is just like a anti abortionist like yourself.
Anyone interested in reading a very good article published in a medical journal on this topic, here is the link: http://www.jpands.org/vol10no4/brind.pdf
FFL LOL. Just because they use Feminist in the name does not make them feminists. I can call a salad bacon but it does not make it bacon. Sorry on the FFL. LOL do you believe everything you read along the line of anti abortion crap. Please
What lies? Let's be specific now, shall we? And yes I am VERY anti-abortion. No doubt. Anyone who is pro-life is - because abortion is the killing of an innocent unborn baby.
When you denegrate women who respect themselves and respect life, you show yourself for exactly who you are. Pathetic.
He is a researcher and got his degree at Baruch college. Who happens to be anti abortion. Wow fancy that.
No I denigrate women who use the term Feminist falsely to suck foolish people into believing what they say.
I posted the links to show what a shyster your Karen Malec is. I also posted links to show how phoney the research is that she uses. I both read and researched your links. They are crap and meaningless as I said earlier.
so nobody has been able to tell me how these little breast cancer cells know the difference between a spontaneous abortion and a medical abortion; or a preterm delivery and a late term abortion ..... what is the chemical difference between these types of processes that enables the cancer cells to read who they can/can't attack?
That is a key truth that is left out. According to the articles I read facts are all spun to make the anti abortion point. I would like to know this as well.
I resent a group calling themselves feminist supports distortion of truth to women about their health issues and has the gall to label there group feminist.
So do I, that is why I detest these pro abortion women who protest and oppose women being told the truth before they are allowed to have an abrtion.
So you are NOT 'pro-choice'...because you cannot accept that there are women who consider themselves feminists AND their choice is to choose life. That people feel that women deserve better then the violence within that kills their children and leaves the woman wounded for life. Face it - you are a proabortionist who attacks those who don't agree with them...facts be (*)(*)(*)(*)ed.
Who is distorting scientific studies and want information about the potential risks of abortion withheld from women considering abortion? The proabortionists. [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3eUVjnhs1c&feature=player_embedded"]PP War on Science[/ame]
WRONG. While Dr. Joel Brind is a professor of biology and endocrinology at Baruch College and critiques abortion-breast cancer studies, Brind optained a bachelors degree from Yale and a Ph.D. from New York University in biochemistry, immunology and physiology. Publications 1992-Present Brind, J. 1996. Trick or treat? (letter) National Review 48(3): 2. Brind, J. 1996. letter re: Iron versus the greenhouse. Science News 149: 67,79. Brind, J. Borofsky, N. Chervinsky, K. Vogelman, J.H. Orentreich, N. 1996. A simple, differential extraction method for the simultaneous direct radioimmunoassay of androgens and androgen glucuronides in human serum. Steroids, 61in press). Brind, J. 1996. Spotlight on DHEA: A marker for progression of HIV infection? (editorial) J. Lab. Clin. Med. (in press). Brind, J. 1996. Abortion and breast cancer: Questions and answers. National Right to Life News, (in press). Brind, J. 1996. Abortion and breast cancer: New JAMA study is revealing. National Right to Life News, 2/6/96: 9. Brind, J. 1995. May cause cancer. National Review, 47(24): 38-41. Brind, J. 1995. Book review of "But is it true? A citizenís guide to environmental health and safety issues", by Aaron Wildavsky. National Review, 47(16) 1. Brind, J. 1995. Abortion and breast cancer: Evidence mounts: laws pass; medical media stay in denial. National Right to Life News, 11/30/95: 22. Brind, J. 1995. Abortion and breast cancer: Malignancy of ëchoiceí. National Right to Life News, 9/7/95: 5. Brind, J. 1995. Abortion and breast cancer: Making a molehill out of a mountain. National Right to Life News, 6/15/95:10. Brind, J. 1995. Abortion and breast cancer: As truth reaches Clinton Administration denial turns to disinformation. National Right to Life News, 4/6/95: 24. Brind, J. 1995. RU 486: Private pills, public abortions. National Right to Life News, February 22, 1995: 15. Brind, J. 1995. Abortion and breast cancer: Denial digs in deeper as evidence mounts of increased incidence of breast cancer in women whoíve aborted. National Right to Life News, January 1995: 8-9. Brind, J. 1994. Abortion and breast cancer: Mass media finally reveal the tip of the iceberg. National Right to Life News, Nov. 18, 1994: 18-22. Brind, J. 1993. Induced abortion as an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Association for Interdisciplinary Research in Values and Social Change Newsletter, 5(3): 1-8. H. and Andres, R. Vogelman, J. Brind, L. N., Long-term longitudinal measurements of plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in normal men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 75: 1002-1004. Levitz, M., U. Raju, J. Katz, T. H. Finlay, J. L. Brind, F. Arcuri, and L. Castagnetta. 1992. Esterase activity in human breast cyst fluid: Associations with steroid sulfates and cations. Steriods, 57: 485-487. Glaser, J., J. L. Brind, J. H. Vogelman, M. J. Eisner, M. C. Dillbeck, R. K. Wallace, D. Chopra, and N. Orentreich. 1992. Elevated serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels in practitioners of the Transcendental Meditation and TM-Sidhi programs. J. Behav. Med., 15: 327-341. Levitz, M., U. Raju, F. Arcuri, J. L. Brind, J. H. Vogelman, N. Orentreich, O. M. Granata, and L. Castagnetta. 1992. Relationship between the concentrations of estriol sulfate and estrone sulfate in human breast cyst fluid. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 75: 726-729. DO TRY to abstain from lies that are so easily found out.
True. How can you consider yourself a feminist if you willfully mislead and attempt to withhold information from women about the horrors of abortion, and the published medical studies that show the long term harm abortion causes those that under go the procedure?
