It is for those who don't mind killing the unborn children of the next generation who would help pay for your social programs. It isn't so good for the unborn child, society, or character. It, as I have said, should not be paid by anyone who does not agree with those folks. That, obviously, as I have consistently posted, means many forms of contraception, including the morning after pill. It's so simple to understand, yet so difficult to find anyone who believes in freedom of choice, of the liberty of not being controlled by the masses, or of the freedom to pursue what makes me happy, even when that is something the majority thinks differently about.
How about capital punishment and justifying murder? I'm not for justifying murder. I am for capital punishment. I think it should be done publicly and by a similar method to picking a jury. Everyone gets a chance to pull the switch or whatever method. I think the methods should be limited to hanging and guillotine. Edit: I'd go for a firing squad, as well. Those folks would need practice, though.
Maybe if free steak wasn't advertised there wouldn't be so many? Do you have any statistics on where they are from and how they were raised and educated?
I couldn't afford them. I couldn't raise them. I'd be dead before they were thirty. See, that's taking responsibility for my abilities and choosing the correct path. Why is that so difficult for the mothers and fathers of those children in your care? How can you be for abortion after seeing those kids smile and have some fun, even if it is not ideal? There is your opportunity to change the amount of new kids you get. Have you considered that?
I'm sorry you have that choice with my money. It pains me to read that. It actually makes me a little nauseated. Kids are the future. Those fetuses you flush down the commode are just tiny children in the first stages of life. They don't mean you any harm. And, you chose to create them by having sex. Blaming it all on them seems disingenuous at best.
Yeah I don't like the way you spend my money either. A fetus can kill a woman. She has every right to get rid of it. But I'm sure you will be very safe in the waiting room
I practice abstinence. Besides, why are you blaming it all on the man, if you consented? It seems women would be much more discerning than men, but the number of children you spoke about proves otherwise. Men must take charge of their fertility. Women have control of whether or not you become a father. If you consider carefully, you can find yourself in control of your own life, instead of allowing the state, law enforcement and the woman you are having sex with to control you. Men, you have a choice. You have a brain. Use it or lose everything you've worked to accomplish.
I have since 2011 by choice. I can't afford a baby. I doubt any woman I'd be interested in having sex with would want me and I don't see the need to lower myself to sleeping with someone just to pleasure myself. I don't think I physically could unless I respected them, and there are few women I can respect that much at this stage of my life with what society has taught me about women. Men are no better, and I'm not gay, so that's out.
Yes, and I've had to turn down women who were marred, single, a different race, older and younger who pursued me and made it very clear what they were after. It isn't easy to turn them down, but a good set of solid boundaries and a strong character kept me from failure. I'm not saying I will never fail, but I am doing my best to be consistent with my convictions.
When did I say it was right for everyone? It is right for me and can be right for many. It is another option and gives control of fatherhood to the man who would supply the sperm. Edit: It would also change society. I can see no quicker way than to have great character. Why would a woman be against having a man look at her as something more than a sperm receptacle and sex toy? I'm confused.
Which idiotic faux tv personality suggested this laughable idea? Or was it limbaugh? A fine for what?
