Which instructions do you habve proof that he didn;t follow So what? they have no legal basis Even if that is the case so what? Its not illegal Martin WAS a screw up= a dangerous violent one and Zimmerman put him in the gorund where he belongs The police decided otherwise whilst you believe someone with a conviction for lying So is lying about being a paralegal
Really. View attachment 23109 Frank Taaffe is just being taxed on property he doesn't own. <<< MODERATOR EDIT: OFF TOPIC >>>
English a struggle for you ? Anyway... surprised to see this thread brought back to life. I forgot the silly delinquent's name until I saw the title.
That's the thing they constantly ignore. It doesn't matter where he walked, what he was wearing, what he was carrying, or who said what to whom..... the FACT is the kid had his destination in site.... but instead chose to come back and confront a strange man in the dark. That's when all those variables suddenly mattered. lol ! It's unbelievable, eh ?
Consumed, I'm not - I just read these M/Z threads occasionally b/c it amazes me to read the gibberish after it's been proven TM would have been safe and sound if he hadn't decided to go back and try to punch out Z's lights....... And what I really find amazing is some of you are parents, had raised teenagers and can't see where M's parents was failing him.... didn't you raise 4-5 kids? I went thru all that about parental responsibility and not going to bother again except to say there was this wannabe thug on his 3rd suspension and he's allowed to go out at night on his own...... Oh well! It's just so much easier to blame Zimmerman, isn't it?
The homes at the Retreat have various encumbrances and restrictions attached to them including right-of-ways and easements. HOA encumbrances such as lawn maintenance do not convey right of use to the HOA but remains with the homeowner. The property factually belongs to the homeowner and not the HOA. The homeowner enjoys land ownership along with an expectation that others respect your property. You assertion that all outside property is 'common' is disproved by the fact that the Plat cites specifically what is common and what is not. It even calls those areas 'common' and delineates them by giving them a name. The deed of record establishes that the common areas were dedicated to the HOA and NOT the individual lots. There is no such thing as 'free use' land in the United States. Every square inch of this country is under the authority of some governing entity that restricts the lands use. Try buying a patch of desert in Arizona and build bombs, open a casino or a brothel or grow some dope. Its your land but has limited use. Ive had rentals,developed property, platted property, addressed city counsels and have built homes. Ive been to 'closing" at Title Companies as many times as you've been to McDonalds. The buildings were not "row houses" They multi-family Townhomes. Your reference to Martin walking in between those buildings as being a common thing is irrelevant. Remember, the claim that you are addressing is not that the cut through was illegal but that it could be considered as suspicious. Thus, you alter the claim. Respectfully,
Actually I read more than you and had to point out certain points to you along with your fallacious assertions about Zimmerman committing an assault and a stalking. DUH he didn't commit one as you claimed. He actions were perfectly reasonable withe request of the NEN dispatcher you are in no position to judge differently or say differently or criticize his actions AT ALL. Nor does you baseless opinion about what he should have done have any bearing on an guilt he might have for anything that occurred that night. And your derogatory remarks about him change nothing as to the facts. They just make YOU look PETTY.
You beat me to it, now watch her run or divert. The fact is Zimmerman acted as any reasonable person might act with regard to the request the NEN dispatcher was making. That was shown in court.
Hmmm....are you saying that this Margot2 is actually real? I mean, I was just playing along responding to her troll posts because she is the only Anti-Zimmerite left here. Sadly Margot2, I NEED you!
why? you figure you are going to hang Zimmerman on some lame notion that Martin had a right to attack Zimmerman and Z was illegal to defend himself?
There was no evidence that Martin partook in any illegal activity. An African American will come out as suspicious to some people no matter how they dress, or how they act. Zimmerman can claim whatever he pleases about Martin's appearence, because Martin is not exactly in a position to defend himself in court.
Not in the least similar to my thinking. I have always thought this controversy was similar to the Tawana Brawley affair.
you're another one of those crying racist and how poor baby Traythug should have been allowed to kill whitey............you can't argue against the forensics that say your opinion don't hold waste water...........go ahead and tell us you were there and saw it all...and how you can testify to all of that and how your facts never made it into court...............what was your excuse to not being at the trial?
8 months later and still no answer. Here's the question again: What could Martin have done to avoid having the cops called on him?
Not act as Zimmerman described he was acting before he called the police as in walk down the center of the walkway and not act suspicious around the back of the condo's between the buildings not look like a thug. Now what could he have done instead of assaulting Zimmerman?
Martin was to avoid the center of the walkway. How many inches from the edge of the walkway is acceptable? Did Zimmerman say that Martin was looking like a "thug"? Did he use that word?
