Hypocrisy and Double Standard of the Left

This is beautiful. Enjoy.
http://www.youngcons.com/students-a...ave-religious-freedom-watch-how-they-respond/

 

College students are definitely the entirety of the Left.

 

Did you get the point?

 

I was trying to explain that same point on another thread. People are taught by the portion of the society they trust, what to believe. Hence, we can see what the intellectual community thinks, by the people they teach. It’s always a "us" and "them" situation. And anything that is good for “us”, in our quest to make and form the world in our own image, is good, in our own judgement. It’s human nature, and it cannot be overcome by some delusional thinking that human nature can change for the good. which in many cases that belief along is used to deceive.


Hence those who operate the voices in a society, (such as media, press, politicians, speakers to groups such as teachers and preachers) know the way to make people think as they want them to. Doesn’t mean its the way or what the speaker thinks or knows, it about how they manipulate the nature of the beast.

This is always the case, but in today’s world, its SOP. For example, just keep watching the effort between the white house and the press to operate and control as they like to call it “the narrative”

 

This is a lot of generalized rambling. I looked in vain for a real point, or fact, or anything to which to respond.

But, nothing but empty rhetoric framed as anti-liberal philosophy.

Wow, just like Faux News!

 

If I do not want to make a dress for Melania, I am not obliged to do so. Fine.
I am not obliged to sing at a ceremony for a religion that I am not an adherent of. OK, makes sense. As does not standing for prayers in a court house or school, if you are an athiest and or your country's laws are designed to be secular, like they are in the usa.
As a photographer or anybody running a person facing business, I am entitled to refuse any work I choose not to do, without giving any reason whatsoever. However as soon as I do declare an intention to refuse service to some group, based on my own intolerance, or put up a notice stating the sort of individuals I will not work with,i.e. gays, Chinese or Irish people, fridge salesmen, democrats, Buddhists etc, I am deliberately contravening those people's human rights to be treated impartially as equal members of society. In brief, I can dislike someone for personal reasons but not a group people for some prejudice I may harbour towards them as a group. Because prejudices are based on pre-judgements not empirical fact, and as such are not legally admissible reasons to discriminate against others.

 

Projection is a commonly used tool.

 

Bunk. False. In the first series of questions the questioner raised issues of the rights of a person to opt-out of an opportunity to do business or to engage in activity. No issue of discrimination was involved. In the questions about the rights to discriminate against others by selectively refusing service as a business, it is a very different story. But I don't suppose your political bias would allow you to see this difference.

 

Common sense reveals your bias.

 

Yeah but you are completely unable to verbalize it. So you protect your invalid viewpoint in that way. You hide.

 

Meaningless rhetoric. The video clearly reveals the hypocrisy of the leftist indoctrination. How come muslim bakeries have never been targeted by the gay mafia?