I'm Reading The Entire Mueller Report | 37% Completed | Very Disturbing

I see. I never would have guessed. Common sense usually provides better information than partisan preferences. I stay with what I said since it is obvious.

 

The report is #FakeNews crap written by 18 angry Democrat Crooked Hillary supporters. This investigation should have ended in the first hour. The Trump campaign was accused of collusion with Russia and they had no evidence of collusion to start the investigation in the first place.

I have no intention of reading it in full because of hype like this. Not gonna waste my time. The report should have been 2 words long. No collusion. Robert Mueller should now be investigated for meddling in the 2018 election. He knew before the midterms there was no collusion but allowed that #FakeNews story to be repeated ad nauseam so Democrats could win the House. This has been the biggest DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN IN HISTORY. Now we know it's all a big lie, shame on you for continuing to advance this conspiracy theory. You are worse than Obama's birthers.

 

Apparently you didn't actually read the report.

 

Go for it.

 

"Full stop" bullshiting yourself. All that foreknowledge and acceptance of Russian disinformation that was provided for hefty fees to Clinton's campaign is what begat this farcical nonsense about collusion. Trump's been exonerated, and Hilda's troubles are just beginning.

 

Obama did that too. He got a slap on the wrist for it.

 

I feel sorry for smug arrogant "well educated" voters who think they're smarter than the average Joe. Don't read the Mueller report. Don't waste your time. It'll only take your IQ down a few points, you see. There's not some bombshell in it. If there were it would have been the first thing pointed out.

Their inability to accept reality that President Trump is fully vindicated is borderline mental illness. We joke about Trump Derangement Syndrome, but this level of mass delusions, the media driven gaslighting of the liberal minds has created this mass hysteria. You watch, this continued gaslighting of the leftist mental will see increasing violence against Trump supporters.

 

If President Obama, the DNC, and Crooked Hillary Clinton had any sense of how important cyber security was, they wouldn't have been hacked, Wikileaks would not have possession of the emails, which expose their corrupt and criminal behavior BTW, and there would be no #FakeNews #RussianCollusionHoax investigation into the Trump campaign. Heck, Maybe Crooked Hillary would have won. This whole idiotic story all goes back to the corruption and incompetence of Democrats, from President Obama, Crooked Hillary, John Podesta, Donna Brazile, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the rest.

 

Bull. Stormy Daniels wasn't paid out of campaign money.

 

In reading the section about the IRA's activities in support of the Orange Nightmare it makes me wonder how many Trumpists recognize the names of some of the social media accounts set up to help Don. Ones like those Facebook estimates reached 126M people in the US.

Oh.......wait..........what am I saying?..........Trumpists aren't going to be reading the report. They can't bear being forced to realize the "witch hunt" meme is a total lie.

 

Did Faux tell you that matters? It doesn't.

 

Mueller report.............

"Multiple members of the Trump campaign also promoted IRA tweets."

 

IRA employees were in the US organizing rallies in support of the Orange Clown.

 

Talking point landmines...
Dem: "AG Barr lied."
Me: "About what?"
Dem: "He said the Mueller report says there was no collusion, no obstruction, but that's not what the report says at all."
Me: "But that is what the Mueller report says."
Dem: "It raises more questions than it answers."
Me: "Such as?"
Dem: "Trump colluded with Russia."
Me: "Not according to the Mueller report."
Dem: "You have to read the report to know what's in it."
Me: "You accused Barr of lying, and Trump of collusion. Can't you give me one example?"
Dem: "Barr is not Trump's personal defense attorney."
Me: "Ugh!"

 

Members of the campaign who unwittingly promoted IRA tweets included Donnie J, Eric, Kellyanne, Brad Parscale, and Mike Flynn.

 

Given what this man has produced on the campaign trail and as President, I'd say that's a serious problem you might want to address some day. If one fails to see the glaring contradiction that is Donald J. Trump, then one might also need to schedule an appointment with one's Ophthalmologist. If one has no heart sufficient to discern the immoral nature of Donald J. Trump, then one might care to see their Priest or Cardiologist (though I seriously doubt the Cardiologist would be able to help).

This man has been nothing short of the Greatest Empty Suit in all the annals of Empty Suitendom. I don't "Suitendom" is a real word, by the way - but it sure did roll of the tongue nicely as far as I am concerned. In fact, I like the phonetics so much that I'm going to pull a Donald J. Trump and just declare that "Suitendom" is a real world out of f-u-c-k-i-n-g whole clothe linguistic silk. Hell, if it works for Trump, may that s-h-i-t will work for me. Why the hell not.

Gawd. Two more years of this s-h-i-t. You've got to be kidding me.

Really? You actually have to ask such a question? You don't know who Malloch happens to be relative to Trump? Are you kidding me? "Mallach got word from Assange...." Full Stop. That right there should alert Malloch, to alert Trump, that we might be getting played here and we should tread with extreme caution by NEVER making contact with these people EVER again. But, noooooooo. That's what Malloch, did. What did that TrumPet (emphasis on Pet) do? He claimed that they were going to somehow be sitting in the catbird seat afterwards.

The operative phrase is: CONSIDER THE SOURCE. Remember that phrase? Remember what it used to mean? Remember the point behind it?

GO forth young man and find thee a worthy Candidate for President in 2020, or I will take my vote and shove it into the ether of the Dark of Night, never to be seen again. You may not care about my vote. But, I cannot in good faith and consciousness stand behind a Major League Hoodlum like Donald J. Trump. Maybe doing so tickles your pink. Maybe you should question why you have a Pink to begin with.

Man the **** up and GO develop a BETTER Candidate. YOU owed that much to the Republican Party for what it USED to stand for more than 100+ years ago. THAT is why I am no longer among you, my dear Brother. Now Man-Up and do the right thing. That's what REAL Republicans do. At least that's what we USED to do.

Mueller, would not have grounds to charge Malloch, or Corsi, with obstruction. There were not in a position to shut down the investigation.

Mueller, does not have to establish that in order to establish "coordination" and "agreement" with Russians by Trump campaign officials/operatives, which Mueller absolutely did establish.

Really? The 5th Amendment would not impute to the President when called to testify before Congress. The 5th Amendment would not impute to the President during an impeachment hearing. The 5th Amendment imputes to the President and protects him against self incrimination in criminal proceedings. Furthermore, there is written legal counsel opinion born of Nixon, putting forth that a sitting President could not be criminally charged, criminally prosecuted, criminally sentenced and/or removed from office by way of criminal law. That precedent has been followed ever since.

This President was never under the threat of criminal prosecution. Mueller, was on a fact finding mission. He provided a Report. That Report is for Congress to use in its decision as to whether or not it will impeach the President. Furthermore, it has never been established that the President actually has 5th Amendment immunity. There is no legal precedent that guarantees the President the right to plead the 5th, especially in a time of national crisis or national emergency. If Military Personnel can have their 5th Amendment right swept away in a time of war or national emergency, then the question as to whether or not the President actually has such a right during a time of "national crisis" (which is exactly what an impeachment process instantiates) is wide open for interpretation.

Either you have not actually read the Report, or you read it but did not understand it, or you read it, fully understood it but would rather pretend that Mueller did not establish "cooperation," "prior knowledge of the premise" and "coordination" between Trump Campaign Officials/Surrogates and Russian Operatives.

Really?




This Report is filled with carnal details like these. A common sense reading of the Report makes it abundantly clear that Trump's Campaign knew that it was engaged in the use of illegally obtained information on the one hand and direct "coordination" with what it knew to be sources having Russian origins on the other hand.

If you are going to play this kind of game, at least be intellectual honest about why you are playing it. That's all I'm asking.

 

Nope. You must not have read it.

 

There's no connection to the campaign. It doesn't matter to me unless it was campaign money. But even if it was campaign money, SO F'ING WHAT! Stupid Democrat hypocrisy! What happened to Vice Presidential nominee John Edwards? Can you tell me? NOTHING! He paid his mistress tens of thousands right out of campaign funds, covered up a love child blaming his campaign manager for being the father, and even paid his mistress as a campaign worker too. Nobody went to jail. Nobody was charged with a criminal offense. So if nothing happened to him, what should happen to President Trump in your opinion?

 

You are right. I haven't. I already know President Trump is innocent. I don't need to read the report that totally exonerates him to know that he is totally exonerated.

 

Intellectual honesty from a Trumpist? You must be joking. BTW, they aren't going to read the report.

 

I listened to Dershowitz today, and unless you are on his level of understanding a highly legalistic report, which I doubt, sorry, I cannot give you any credibility whatsoever. Sorry. Or anyone else here with your attitude.

Dershowitiz is not some conservative, trump supporter, but a democrat and a liberal.And that is important. He does not put partisanship over all else, as most on the left do. Even IMO, the people who have an education in law.

 

You don't understand the difference between why he was not charged and what Don did.

 

Clean hey?
Well, one's opinion is based on facts, another is wishful thinking.

So, no, they don't hold the same weight.

 

You cannot know that of which you are not informed. 2. the part after the underlined establishes that at no time did anyone in the Trump campaign bite the Russian baloney even though every attempt was made by the purveyors of Russian boloney to disguise the fact that it was Russian baloney they were selling.

 

Kind of says it all doesn't it. After all Jesus did help put Trump in office.