You havn't shown anything and have yet to explain what an abortionist is . and of course there is no answer for stupid .. which is always a problem - not just mine - but of humanity in general. You are avoiding defining your terms - explaining what you mean by zygote - refused even to use the word - refused to suggest what word you would use instead - refused to say if you think the single cell at conception is an unborn child .. No answer I have as to why you want to hide in the corner .. and while a problem to which Ihave no solution - is not my problem mate
Naw .. the subject understands what they are doing - understands they are spewing illogical, irrational contradictory gibberish ... but continues anyway.
You have claimed those who use the term zygotes are engaging in Nazi like behavoir - but have failed to back up this claim -by stating whether or not you think a zygote is an "unborn child" . and no - you don't need to support your claim but then, what is it worth ?
I realize you have not supported your claim that folks who use the term zygotes are engaging in Nazi like behavoir. Black folks are fine people - what does this irrelevent question have to do with zygotes ?
Hahaha! The comparison has been made. Deal with it. Black folks are folks just like all folks. Slave owners thought blacks were subhuman hence making it OK to use them as slaves. See how that works?
You are the one that has a problem with it so yes, it is yours to deal with. I am sure Nazis would want to get into why Jews were the worst of the worst and slave owners would want to discuss evolution and how blacks weren't fully evolved just as pro abortion folks.want to talk about zygotes.
What problem is that ? I'm not the one running around making nonsense claims about folks who talk about zygotes being like Nazi's - and refusing to back up that claim. That would be you projecting your failure onto others. You have denied affirming that a zygote is an unborn child .. so are you one of these pro abortion folks ? wanting to reduce the status of of the mighty zygote to that of a single human cell ?
Your posts are not making much sense. It seems you have ran out of steam and are just grasping at straws. I have not made the claims you say I have and you have failed to show where my comparison is invalid. In other words: you lose.
You refused to afirm that a zygote is an unborn child. while ranting about how those who use the word zygotes engaging in Nazi like behavoir - dehumanizing the zygote. So .. which is it .. is a zygote an "unborn child" .. or not backed into a corner of self contradiction you are ... completely lost.
didn't go anywhere -- as you will not clarify whether or not you think a zygote is an unborn Child .. which is the same as calling it a human... so your goalpost moving claim is false. .. Answer either goalpost to continue Is the zygote an "Unborn Child" - or is it not ?
Oh so "human" and "unborn child" are now the same? Hahaha! Answer me this: if it is not human then what is it?
Is a child not a human ? What mad world do you live in where a child is not a human ? - giggling to yourself foaming at the mouth spouting nonsense. Is what a human ? what is this "it" you are referring to ? an "unborn child" ? stop giggling , wipe the foam from mouth .. and speak man
A child dog is not a human. It is called a puppy. Now stop babbling and answer my question: If a zygote is not human then what is it?
Never said a dog was a human - you are making up fantasies - and projecting these onto others. Never said a zygote was not human .. is a falsehood a sentence with you..
Now you changed the question ... but to answer this question - A zygote is a single human cell. Did you not know this ?
Correct .. a human cell "the zygote" .. Blacks and Jews are all human - finally you have figured it out . The question you are still stumbling over is whether or not a zygote is an unborn child ? - have you figured that one out yet ?
You didn't answer that one either . but was similar .. see OP Title - You have been ranting on about an "Unborn Child" - is the zygote what you are referring to - or not ?