It is your assertion that the zygote is an "innocent Child" If this is the case .. then the by your definition the children of the zygote are also "innocent children" as these children are .. 1) identical to the zygote .. being totipotent - 2 each individually able to create a new human ? Biology 101 is it not ? am I mistaken here - or are you a "Science Denier"
It is your assertion that the zygote is an "innocent Child" This is not my Assertion My assertion is simply that the totipotent children of the zygote .. are clones of the parent - . and therefore .. as per your assertion - we have not one person .. but two people after the first mitotic division.
You have things backwards mate... It has been YOUR assertion that a zygote is an "innocent child" Or have you changed your position .. hard to keep track with some of these anti-aborts .. dancing around from position to position from one post to the next in a sorded dance of denial and deceit .
Your assertion -- not mine .. I do not claim a zygote is an "Innocent Child" nor the children of the zygote. Your will is that these innocent children be killed .. "Your" will .. not mine .. as I do not believe these totipotent cells are children.
Nope you asserted hundreds of human beings are killed when a mother gives birth, a totally nonsensical assertion with no basis in reality but it is what YOU believe. Why do you support it?
I asserted that hundreds of zygote progeny were killed when a mother gives birth .. as that is what "The Science" states -- .. YOU are the one that claims a zygote is an "Innocent child" - not me. Its just that Mr. Biology 101 has yet to figure out that the children of the Zygote - are genetically identical to the parent zygote .. and so are just as much "Innocent Children" as the Parent Zygote. Sorry mate .. your argument is crucified at both ends .. and you know it
