Is Having A Lawful a Government A Civil Right?

Where did it say Noah Webster claimed anything, it is yourself that is claiming and your claim conflicts. Webster is lucky that he never had to experience the language of this century but I have and it is not pretty.

As to the last and this century as regards to language, you can read all about it in George Orwell's 1984. No, no dictionary is ever out of date but that would seem to be a concept beyond your grasp.

Now to the real topic at hand, if you have a right that is due, then you have nothing but a debt, a debt that can't be paid. A right is never due except in a legal sense, a right is inherent and fundamental. You either have it or you don't, nothing is due.

 

Labeling, all or nothing thinking cognitive infiltration tactics. Emotional reasoning, nonsense. Irrational, unaccountable.

 

Yes, Government must be ensured in our States and the Union.

 

.




.​

 

If your right entitles you to nothing — your right has no significance. You may have it, you may not... it doesn't matter either way.



​

 

Hah, accusing others of the behavior they exhibit is exactly the kind of thing covert agents, cognitive infiltrators try to do as they are supporting treason.

Explaining why you pretend to not understand the principles of the republic requires some commitment.

 

First part wasn't catastrophic, the death blow is the bold part.

 

I thought you emphatically stated he was dead and defined nothing? Which is it?

 

You're dancing around the issue and trying to squirm away from continuing any commitment.

 

Dead people don't do anything. Except maybe rot. Noah Webster defines nothing.



​

 

So is this your new fear? Do you feel that eyes are upon you? Well let me relieve you from that fear, nobody really cares about your little conspiracy theory unless they need a good laugh.

You really do need to read, but then that won't help without comprehension. I understand the principles of a republic to a much higher degree than you seem to be able to phantom. Trying researching (if you are capable) this:

republic>>>>democracy>>>oligarchy>>>chaos.

 

Clownish efforts to misrepresent just are not going to work.

Contrary to that is closer to the truth, they care so much they are afraid to discuss it, but you cannot find in this thread where I'm discussing such besides the act of 1871 and cognitive infiltration.

Your behavior proves the conspiracy is fact.

 

The South had to be "reconstituted" due to that requirement.

 

Daniel, the fact that the south was populated with Europeans well before the north had been.

Some of those rebellious elements found their way to America. In fact, the south east and gulf were inhabited by French refugees from the first crusades well before the Mayflower landed.

http://m.ibtimes.com/fort-caroline-...-north-america-may-be-located-georgia-1557254

Fort Caroline was in place 56 years before the Mayflower, and the French origins go far further back than any might think.

Britan knew this. They preferred to fight France directly rather than engage the early French settlements that sprang forth from the Brotherhood of the Coast and populated considerably inspiring the Carolina's, or settlement of refugees from the crusades.

The Spanish destroyed them. Later, when the north was more populated England assisted the north with money, arms and Irish immigrants to overcome the south. "Reconstitution" was really bringing the south back into secret roman imperialism.

 

No excuse for having to be bailed out by Yankee ingenuity.

Y'all merely needed to "harass the Judicature" more and insist on eminent domain to abolish slavery, simply Because, an public policy constitutes an public use.

 

I agree, so stop doing it.

So that big bad government has nothing better to do than to follow a poor lost soul without a clue as to what is really happening or why? If they are monitoring you, they would have it listed as "If you want a good laugh". Hey even those evil conspirators need a little break here and there.

Actually, except for a brief mention in passing you have not discussed anything about any act of 1871. And by the act of 1871 I take you mean that little conspiracy theory based on Congress chartering the District of Columbia as a municipal corporation. Evil governments around the world have conducted many false flag conspiracies but just how is his one of them? But then you would have probably gone to the Statutes at Large and read this little gem of an act that was passed in February of 1871, or perhaps not. I have not notice any discussion at all on this from you.

And I'm glad your vocabulary has improved to the point that you can misuse cognitive. Now keep an eye out for those infiltrators, they are around every bend.

What conspiracy? Are you referring to how you are so easily exposed as not knowing what you are talking about? Pretty obvious when your whole theorem is so easily proved to be logical fallacies with a few minor rebuts and request for details.

 

As such it was and not in their favor nor anybody else's:

 

Missed the bus again I see.

 

There is more missing history than just that. Meaning it really was not about slavery. It was to stop a form of heresy not recorded in history.

 

More misrepresentation and cognitive distortion. Very dishonest.

People need to be educated into cognitive infiltration. Examine the graphics on theintercept page, look for the word "mirroring" on about the fifth one down, that is what al is doing. Found it! About in the center of the image.




http://www.salon.com/2010/01/15/sunstein_2/

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2014/02/24/jtrig-manipulation/

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/snowden_cyber_offensive2_nbc_document.pdf

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE95K0ZV20130621?irpc=932
For decades, the NSA and GCHQ have worked as close partners, sharing intelligence under an arrangement known as the UKUSA agreement. They also collaborate with eavesdropping agencies in Canada, Australia and New Zealand under an arrangement known as the "Five Eyes" alliance.

 

The upper blue oval near the center of the above graphic is an in depth study of cultural and social behaviors by Hofstede. It was done around 1970 using IBM employees world wide.

https://geert-hofstede.com/national-culture.html

Cognitive infiltration represents a form of psyops against the American people and their constitution.

 

Yes, even if we have to "harass the Judicature" about it.

 

Would you recommend formal pleadings directed at the judicature relating to their oath and the constitution with the laws they violate that work to assure lawful government?

 

So, fundamentally, might is right.