It's odd how many gay men who knew Obama have either died or disappeared. Here is an excerpt from an interesting (and lenghty) article I found: Another strange male character in Barack Obama’s life was/is Michael Signator. This guy used to be a Chicago cop and, thus, had access to weapons when he worked as a driver during Obama’s state Senator days into his US Senate years —and up until June of 2008 when Signator just stopped working for Obama and vanished not long before the Gay Pride Parade in Chicago on June 29th of that year. A few weeks before Pride, the Politico’s website ran a few brief, odd stories about candidate-Obama’s daily schedule, which included driving miles out of the way to head to Signator’s house for “workouts” that lasted between 15 and 20 minutes. Politico wrote these articles with winks at readers, wondering what the heck kind of workout lasted 20 minutes and was so important that it required the candidate to head to Signator’s house whenever in Chicago. It was beyond strange. Especially if you consider that Obama belonged to the East Bank Club downtown in Chicago, which is a very expensive gym and spa center where Obama spent June 29th playing basketball with guys like Reggie Love then enjoying a long steam and locker room antics before heading to the Southside to get his hair cut. Signator has not turned up since he vanished in June of 2008 and to this day no explanation has ever been given for what the heck he was doing with Obama during those 20-minute workout sessions at his house. http://hillbuzz.org/is-barack-obama-gay
Why don't you go clean your mouth, and better yet, your mind. Vainly trying to "imply" dirt is not only stupid it is destructive. This thread is nothing but flame baiting. It has no redeeming value
I voted yes. Certainly not because I think it is true, as it seems like a middle school locker room sort of allegation. I voted yes to skew the poll. Indeed, disparaging the president in such a juvenile manner rather than taking him to task on a myriad of real things I believe shows exactly why the right lost the last presidential election. The focus was on sipping nonsense, cheap soundbites that played well in the single wides of this country., Rather than put forth an actual platform, this is what the GOP has become.
Oh Lordy, Lordy. How dare anybody draw attention to suspicious episodes on the background of an elected official. Preposterous!
Suspicious episodes? The homosexual accusations are wholly manufactured. When using such things as logic, a married man with 2 children, one could easily come to the logical conclusion that the man is straight. But that does not play well to the closeted and the insecure, so they call the president gay.
How do you account for the fact that so many gay men involved with Obama during different parts of his career all either died of vanished during his first run for POTUS?
Manufactured paranoia from right wing hacks who think calling someone gay is the pinnacle of intellectual arguments. Any other questions?
Way to contradict yourself in one post. Oh yeah - have you never hears of the concept of a "beard"? You would have if you read my OP.
No, I have pretty consistently thought the gay accusations towards the president are both unfounded and immature.
Lots and lots attempts by his opponents to smear Obama. Thats how I account for the bizarre claims. I have noticed that when it comes to Birthers there really isn't any bizarre theory or conspiracy idea that is too extreme for them as long as it has to do with "Obama bad".
Exactly- if you go back to the emails smears that were being circulated in 2008, there were lots of specific cue words being used to trigger fears in the easily manipulated and those who were inclined to fear a black President anyway. Gay- Muslim-African-Ursurper-Murderer-Corrupt- Commie-Marxist-Affirmative Action- whatever key words they thought would trigger a negative emotional reaction. This really is one more demonstration of the intellectual bankruptcy of the Birther movement- there is one common theme that they have consistantly had since 2008- "something is wrong with Obama- we just need to find the evidence to know what it is. Since we can't find the evidence he must be hiding it. So we just accuse him of everything and say he has to prove he isn't any of these things."- this is the continuing mantra of Birthers.
When Gov McGreevy of NJ who was married and had one child admitted to being gay that was news, because it was a fact. Fishing for a way to label Obama or any other public official as gay to disparage them is senseless and has nothing to do with the job hes doing whether you think its good or bad. Now, if it comes out that he is in fact gay then that is news. Until then this fishing for something bad is blah.
He went to go Talk with, Smoke with, Drink with, or Hang out with an old friend? Its seems like the author of the article you posted was joking around, or if he was serious then the author must be delusional.
Really OP? I don't like Obama. Why? Because of many different real and tangible reasons like the stimulus package that did not stimulate a damn thing. So why the need to manufacture a conspiracy theory when the man has so many real failings that we can point out?
I don't think its a secret that he's gay, but just for confirmation, I suggest you see how he threw out the first pitch at a baseball game. I can't think of any woman who throws a baseball as limp-wristed and as girly-like as did obama. His girly figure is also a pretty good sign that he's a bone puffer.
Exactly- if you go back to the emails smears that were being circulated in 2008, there were lots of specific cue words being used to trigger fears in the easily manipulated and those who were inclined to fear a black President anyway. Gay- Muslim-African-Ursurper-Murderer-Corrupt- Commie-Marxist-Affirmative Action- whatever key words they thought would trigger a negative emotional reaction. This really is one more demonstration of the intellectual bankruptcy of the Birther movement- there is one common theme that they have consistantly had since 2008- "something is wrong with Obama- we just need to find the evidence to know what it is. Since we can't find the evidence he must be hiding it. So we just accuse him of everything and say he has to prove he isn't any of these things."- this is the continuing mantra of Birthers.
I am simply stating facts. I never meant to imply these facts as evidence of any wrongdoings. Why do you liberals avoid the tough questions?
Please don't be patronizing. Recall how the liberals were accusing Bush of fudging his service records? Yeah. And it is a fact that that many gay men who knew Obama (such as the one whom then-state Senator would visit for his "workouts") went mising or dead. Recall the choir director of Obama's church? How he and another gay male from Obama's church were both killed on the SAME DAY, execution style? Look it up. Did you know that his mother is in hiding to this day? According to an interview she gave, there is no doubt in her mind that her son was killed by Obama's people. Look it up! This is just the tip of the iceberg. I know of at least eight or nine gay men - all friends/associates of Obama - who went missing or were randomly killed between 2007 and 2008. Fun fact: Remember those two gay men in from Obama's church who were murdered? Well, the first thing Rahm Emmanuel did after being sworn in as Mayor of Chicago was to close the investigation. And these are facts.
Ha ha. Is this supposed to be a "how do you like it" sort of thing? The only difference between your claim and mine is that I have facts which can offered as evidence of my hypothesis.
'the facts'? Lots of very unsubstantiated claims- you didn't even mention Donald Young's name Meanwhile you can start by giving some actual facts- like who it is you think was murdered- with links to newsources(sorry WND does not count) about their deaths. As I said Lots and lots attempts by his opponents to smear Obama. Thats how I account for the bizarre claims. I have noticed that when it comes to Birthers there really isn't any bizarre theory or conspiracy idea that is too extreme for them as long as it has to do with "Obama bad". - - - Updated - - - Then why are you so coy about actually giving us any facts and substantiating them? Have you stopped beating your wife yet?
I answered the question in your OP. If you have a problem with anyone else, or "liberals" in general, take it up with them.