Islam religion should be banned in the U.S.

Because, as a culture, they hang together and tend not to support the position you have just described as the liberal one.

 

Please point out where I'm wrong.

 

The rate of attacks is increasing dramatically. They are the only people that think killing people via blowing one's self up is how you get into heaven.

If we can't effectively vet, they should never come here.

 

1) Leftist politicians, with the overwhelming support of the left, pay to import, house, feed, clothe, and educate Muslims. Additionally, great pains are taken to accomodate their religious practices. It is the only religion where coercive measures ensure accomodation, while other religions are denigrated by the left.

2) I believe that the thickness of my skull is quite average and not at all noteworthy.

 

Yes and they will continue to increase as long as the west keeps bombing them into oblivion and if they try and ban the religion the amount of attacks would grow at an incredible rate. These are not options for stopping terrorists attacks but only help kindle the fire.

What does that have to do with what I said? There have been many suicide missions in the military or missions with very little chance of survival and many non-Muslims have volunteered to take these.

Not sure what this sentence is about.

 

So, I should pattern my response on that of the minority of Muslims?

 

Well I hope they would do that to any refugee. Especially refugees that come from an area in which your country had a significant hand in making it unstable.

Please give examples.

Sorry for that comment but I have seen hundreds of comments on how the left support Islam. It has never been shown to be true. An example is when someone says "I support your right for free speech but I don't agree with what you say." As liberals we support people to practice their religion even though we don't agree with it.

 

There's this:

http://www.cnn.com/2015/03/10/opinions/kosmin-anti-semitism-campus/index.html

And this:

http://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/29/florida-school-under-fire-pro-islam-anti-christian/

 

Soft Lefties around the world have emboldened our enemies.

I don't see western people strapping bombs to their chest, do you? Its a tad different when your talking about war. For example invasion of Normandy =/= flying planes into buildings. That is a strategic attack, these Muslims are targeting civilians.

Vetting means evaluating potential immigrants. If we don't have sufficient resources to claim they are not a threat, or a bonus to our country, we should not bring them in.

 

Wow, what a horrible article. Absolutely zero information on what actually happened. I do agree she shouldn't have been asked that initial question but what does it have to do with Muslims. Anti-semitism runs through many different people of different religions.

That article is even worse. It's an opinion piece with no references or information. The book in question could actually be a book solely on the religion of Islam. He doesn't even mention the book. This is just pure Islam scare. I'm willing to bet this doesn't even exist.

 

OK

 

I actually side with a lot of your (Your Country's ) enemies. I don't need any government telling me who my enemies should be. I can make my own mind up on that.

The west has a huge military with large amounts of firepower and technology at their disposal. I know one can feel terrorists are cowards running into a crowd on civilians but I think the bigger cowards are those who drop bombs from thousands of feet up never actually seeing the enemy or someone in a closed system pushing buttons so that missiles and drones do their bidding. You take your military arsenal out of the equation and now you are the country that has been subjugated to bombings and invasions then I would have no doubt some disheartened victims and over zealous Christians would strapping explosives to their chest and chopping heads off of their oppressors.

The thing with what you are talking about is both sides had a chance of winning. When one side has almost nothing they will do anything they can to get at their enemy. I don't condone it but how else would they fight back?

Thank you for the explanation. I partly agree with you but I also know the difficulty in this. Especially when you have particular right-wing news sources that only print negative Muslim or immigrant related stories. Some which have been proven to be false or highly inaccurate. It paints a bigger negative light on an already explosive topic.

 

You will do whatever you think is right.

My priority is to protect my own culture and way of life.

 

Targeting helpless citizens is more courageous to you? ... Wow.

You remind me of Obama's apology tour, and as soon as he was done the whole region turned to ****. Our enemies consist of terror states.... Whose your favorite though? North Korea? Iran? Russia? ISIS?

This forum never seizes to amaze me.

 

That makes you a deplorable bigot, just like me!

 

Well neither is courageous but the example I gave are definitely the biggest cowards.

I have nothing against the people of Iran, North Korea or Russia. ISIS is horrible. They need to be stopped but the current method is only making things worse.

 

Yes NK has become a civilized nation

 

Assumes extremist alt right factoids NOT in evidence!

 

Not only are they funding them--they're slipping them into localities without even informing local elected officials that they are coming, and Christian social service organizations are managing it, instead of taking care of Christian minorities being exterminated over there. It's almost unbelievable.

 

It's what is happening.

 

Some religions are already banned by the Constitution, practice them and you will be arrested, and some religions are banned by the States, and many religions that are not forbidden by the Constitution cannot be practiced in DC either; religions, countless in number, are banned by the laws, and those religions do not have to be named.

Just one example:

“Other cultures practiced cannibalism as part of religious rituals…”
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart...ns-to-eat-people-2308456/#vw1Rd9r78LKyvMHl.99

If the government denies one single tenet of any religion, it has denied religious freedom. If the government arrests someone for any religious action, it has made war against the religion.

There is nothing whatsoever in the Constitution that forbids Congress declaring war against a religion or any entity. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_War

 

Prove it!

 

Islam is already banned:

“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”

"[24.33] ... and do not compel your slave girls to prostitution, when they desire to keep chaste, in order to seek the frail good of this world's life; and whoever compels them, then surely after their compulsion Allah is Forgiving, Merciful."

"(3) Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: We got female captives in the war booty and we used to do coitus interruptus with them. So we asked Allah's Apostle about it and he said, "Do you really do that?" repeating the question thrice, "There is no soul that is destined to exist but will come into existence, till the Day of Resurrection." (Book #62, Hadith #137)"

I will leave it to you to quote all the sections of the Constitution and Amendments and International laws that ban that.

“Rape is not an enemy but a technique of warfare -- political intimidation through the selective breeding of unarmed non-combatants.” (Zbigview Brznutski, Obama supporter)

(Terrorized by 'War on Rape' - Washingtonpurplethrobbingpost) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/23/AR2007032301613.html

 

Another expert on the Qu'ran and Islam

 

Yes, Islam is banned, just as the practice of the Confederate religion of “Christianity” is also banned.

The free exercise of one cannot deprive another of their rights:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

That amendment bans Obama and Clinton’s mental retardation:

"We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of [those that believe blacks are Kenites the descendants of Cain and the mark is upon them].” (Obama)

"The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of [those that believe blacks are Kenites the descendants of Cain and the mark is upon them]." (Clinton)


Are you so stupid that you think Islam’s “Qu'ran” admits of one interpretation?