It was a bomb, not a second plane, who said a second plane...I saw it no second plane!

Some highly credible people in full view of the south tower testified they saw an explosion with no plane.

"No I saw it, I was looking right at it, the second building, no plane hit, it just blew up"

so many people heard massive explosions

so many people seen an 'just' explosion no plane what so ever!

How did the reporter respond?

It was a plane "We saw it on TV"!

Sounds very suspicious to me!

Now TV overules first hand eye witnesses!

Hard to believe the TV planes when the graphics looks like very poor c movie hollywood cgi.

 

More first hand eye witness 'no plane' testimony!



I guess when we go to court now days all we need to do is bring in a TV,
"but judge we saw it on TV"!

First hand witnesses no longer required?

 

Obviously all the people who actually saw the plane, filmed a plane, heard the plane don't count. But a few who were in no position to see it are suddenly "witnesses". It beggars belief that there are people around who actually think this, let alone prepared to argue it.

 

All the viewers should watch this.

provocateurs,shills and disinfo agents

(7:20 time mark)

 

Scott, thats a 'nobody' anti-protestor trying to block free speech on youtube

She is not a 'first hand eye witness'.

She saw it on TV!

Professional reporters in the clip were first hand eye witnesses to the event.

How can anyone accept as credible a youtube anti-free-speech protestor that seen nothing first hand compared to first hand eye witness professional news reporters on the live reporting from the seen?

(Hint these reporters had no news feed on sight so they did not see it on TV and report what they saw on TV!)

They reported on what they saw looking directly at the building.
No plane, Just an explosion.

More importantly not to mention hundreds of other people that are first hand eye witnesses that saw an explosion and testified they saw no plane, just and explosion!

The rest of these people had no affiliation with TV or media!


If you take the time to do background checks ALL the first reports came people that were affiliated with TV/Media!

They told you what they saw on TV!

 

DITTO
Let's set the scene at "Evil-Planners-R-Us". Early planning meeting where 1,2 or more of these unknown people are having a preliminary discussion on what to do once the planes are hijacked/or whatever.

Shadowy figure 1: Right, so once we've got control of UA175, fly towards New York and hit the other WTC building.
Shadowy figure 2: No. I disagree. I think we should use a bomb. Nobody will notice.
Shadowy figure 1: Ok, so doesn't that kind of complicate it a bit?
Shadowy figure 3: I think we should use a military plane instead.
Shadowy figure 1: Sorry guys, surely we're needlessly complicating this?
Shadowy figure 2: No, not at all. Piece of cake.
Shadowy figure 1: Well now....

• We have to get rid of the actual plane.
• Create loads of pieces for it.
• Magically distribute them around Manhattan and hope nobody notices.
• We need to get rid of the passengers.
• Chop them up and stick a few body parts around.
• They have to be burnt and then we need the DNA from them so they can be identified.
• We need to convince air traffic control it's been hijacked.
• We need to fabricate some passenger cell phone conversations.
• If we're planting a bomb we need to involve military or 3rd party and it must be accurate.
• This bomb has to be plane shaped but more importantly, we need a magic bomb with jet fuel that blows inwards!
• We need to manufacture dozens and dozens of videos and hope nobody releases one without the plane.

Shadowy figure 2 and 3: Sorry boss. We're just not thinking straight. You're right it's totally insane to even consider. But what the hell, let's just do it.
Shadowy figure 1,2 and 3: High fives everyone.
Shadowy figure 2: Boss, boss, I've got it. Why don't we install some cannons in the building, then we can fire off all the engine bits into the streets.
Shadowy figure 1: Works for me, dead easy to install, let's do it. Where's my brandy?

 

There do seem to be some anomalies in the footage of the plane hitting the south tower*. It's plausible that the footage was doctored before being broadcast to cause confusion in future analyses.


*
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...o-wtc1-and-wtc2.610194/page-6#post-1074221241

 

It was the third tower hit by the second plane not the second tower. Most people don't know there were three twin towers but there were.

 

Clearly the FBI in the CIA colluded to fake this whole incident. Actually, it might be that the buildings did not exist in the first place. Just fake footage and they put something in the water locally.

 

there are all sorts of possibilities, the jennifer footage super slo mo!

Looks hauntingly like the same chemicals!






Of course thats not a 757 as advertised.

the only people saw a plane saw it on TV!

 

Could be. I suspect that they probably did fake the whole WTC complex with CGI then hurriedly brought in REAL wreckage. I can't see the CIA getting involved though, I think they would definitely farm it out to the MIB (US) division - they're real mean - they do all sorts of wicked things like talking about Will's wife in front of him. They are expert in fake plane footage - allegedly.

 

Can you please explain what that means?

 

It means anybody can claim anything to be true and a certain amount of people will believe it.

 

I can't disagree with that since I posted that same point just recently.

 

this is a thread where the imagination can run wild...

 

well they didnt convince the first hand eye witnesses, to this day they stand by no plane, it was a bomb!

They were there they saw it and made their claims 'before' being forced by media to believe the TV!

Here is leventhal pressuring this guy to agree with the TV!

 

very wild indeed.


How do you 'know' whats real in todays digital world?

You saw this on TV too!




Is it real?

Thats some nice cgi in the matrix!

 

Yeah, and isn't it amazing how all the people involved have kept secret. Such discipline!

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com › science › wwiis-atomic-bomb-program-was-so-secretive-that-even-many-of-the-participants-were-in-the-dark › 2019 › 10 › 31 › 8d92d16c-fb7e-11e9-8906-ab6b60de9124_story.html
WWII's atomic bomb program was so secretive that even many of the ...
Nov 2, 2019Secret cities. Secret work. During World War II, about 130,000 people were involved in the Manhattan Project, a highly classified collective effort that produced the first nuclear weapons and

Im not sure what you are trying to say, that secrets arent possible? I think the manhattan project is pretty good proof that theory is not true.

Im not sure what that has to do with all the people that were censored including highly credible news people who were first hand eye witnesses like many others who said the same, and how could we fall for some mass delusion that the TV is the last word on 'truth'? Sounds like courts are obsolete?

Looks like leventhal pressuring that guy to agree with what they put on the TV for public consumption to sell their war may have gotten stuck, lets see if it works this time...

 

If the Manhattan project personnel had indeed been anally probing aliens the whole time (and we are still in the dark), your theory might be correct.

 

I cant remember the guys name Mark.... but I will post it when I run across it again...

Then they trotted him out, an 'actor' that worked for the media, and they used him (a total nobody) to set the stage,....he said he saw it all, that the plane just careened into one side and out the other, and all those intense flames weakened the steel causing the buildings to collapse.

Combined with showing it 30 times a day for 3 years people believed it and all the scammers that wanted 2 seconds of fame saw it too, (on TV)

 

I've heard from a good source that the probing was the other way around, hence the urgent need for secrecy.

 

good one

 

showing videos taken on the opposing side of the impacts? I’m sure it did look like an explosion…

there doesn’t appear to be any context in this thread … can’t see a plane if it’s blocked out of view from the buildings…

 

Takes an impressive level of idiocy to think some people not seeing something happen offsets the multitudes who did see it happen