Its funny to watch Conservatives cling to Rasmussen

Discussion in 'Elections & Campaigns' started by HeNeverLies4, Oct 30, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. HeNeverLies4

    HeNeverLies4 New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2012
    Messages:
    274
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. sec

    sec Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2008
    Messages:
    31,748
    Likes Received:
    7,815
    Trophy Points:
    113
    there is only 1 poll which matters and thus why I've been holding pro-America signs, have had a pro-America bumper sticker on my car since a year ago, my children are all voting pro-America and we've been getting out the word.

    I've already voted early for the pro-America duo of Romney/Ryan so i can continue to hold signs up until the election day.
     
  3. Lee S

    Lee S Moderator Staff Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2012
    Messages:
    10,649
    Likes Received:
    2,624
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes it is funny. Why would anyone cling to the polling organization that has the highest accuracy over the last four federal election cycles? Why would one use a polling organization that uses the largest samples? Why would you use an organization that has outspent their two closest rivals researching polling methods and sampling selections? That is just crazy talk! Of course the non-laughable method is to use old polls or the one or two polls that show Obama is winning while ignoring all the rest.
     
  4. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,488
    Likes Received:
    2,222
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Rasmussen was one of the worst pollsters in 2008, that's why. They pooched all the state polls badly, usually giving the GOP a +4 bias. Their national poll sucked just as badly until the last few days, when they removed the bias so they could point to the last poll and pretend to be accurate. That tactic fools the rubes, as the righties here demonstrate.

    Being a liberal, it means I reject cherrypicking and look at all the data. So let's do that, and check out the poll aggregators. Ooh, not looking good for Romney at all.

    RCP O290-R248
    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...mlhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/pollster

    Pollster.com O277-R206
    Pollster: Pictures, Videos, Breaking News

    Five-thirty-eight.com (Nate Silver) O294.6-R243.4
    Election Forecasts - FiveThirtyEight Blog - NYTimes.com

    Princeton Election consortium O303-R235
    Princeton Election Consortium — A first draft of electoral history

    AP O271-R206
    AP Analysis: Advantage Obama in race for electoral votes

    InTrade O281-R257
    2012 Electoral Map - The Intrade Forecast 10/30/2012
     
  5. Craftsman

    Craftsman Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2012
    Messages:
    5,285
    Likes Received:
    22
    Trophy Points:
    0
  6. Shangrila

    Shangrila staff Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2010
    Messages:
    29,114
    Likes Received:
    674
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Thread does not meet guidelines for thread creation. Please refer to the forum rules.

    Shangrila
    Site Moderator
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page