Jesus was a Jew. Why do some Christians and Muslims hate Jews?

Jesus was a Jew. Why do some Christians and Muslims hate Jews?

The racism that many show against Jews, must by definition include Jesus, as he only taught Jewish traditions along with his criticisms of it. This included the Jewish esoteric and mystical teachings similar to Gnostic Christian thinking. Jesus’ forte.

Yahweh chose to have the Jews and Romans sacrifice Jesus and thus the Jews hold no blame.

Yahweh loved the Jews and it seems counter intuitive to have religions like Christianity and Islam, who have usurped the Jewish Yahweh and Jesus from the Jews, to try to take the Jew out of Jesus and hating that Jewishness.

Jewry is the root and patriarch of Christianity and Islam, yet those religions do not seem to respect their own Jewish roots.

Roots should be revered. Christians and Muslims do not love or respect their religious fathers and mothers; so to speak.

Jesus was a Jew.

Why do some Christians and Muslims hate Jews?

Regards
DL

 

Well lets take a look at their sacred beliefs:

Maybe because Jews hate them?

WHAT THE TALMUD TEACHES ABOUT CHRISTIANS

IDOLATERS
anyone who examines Jewish books which speak of the "Worshippers of the Stars and Planets," "Epicureans," "Samaritans," etc., cannot but conclude that these idolaters are none other than Christians. The Turks are always called "Ismaelites," never idolaters.

(42a) Vide Infra. ch. II, p. 42

CHRISTIANS WORSE THAN THE TURKS
"It is not permitted to drink the wine of a stranger who becomes a convert,(43) that is, one who accepts the seven precepts of Noah, but is permitted to gain some benefit from it.

Vide, Sanhed, 56a.

MURDERERS

In Abhodah Zarah (22a) it says:

"A Jew must not associate himself with gentiles because they are given to the shedding of blood."

Likewise in Iore Dea (153,2):

"An Israelite must not associate himself with the Akum [Christians] because they are given to the shedding of blood."

FORNICATORS

In the Abhodah Zarah (15b) it says:

"Animals of the masculine sex must not be left in the barns of the Gentiles with their men, nor animals of the feminine sex with their women; much less must animals of the feminine sex be left with their men and of the masculine sex with their women. Nor must sheep be left to the care of their shepherds; nor must any intercourse be had with them; nor must children be given into their care to learn to read or to learn a trade

UNCLEAN

The Talmud gives two reasons why the Goim are unclean: because they eat unclean things, and because they themselves have not been cleansed (from original sin) on Mount Sinai. In Schabbath, (145b) it says:

"Why are the Goim unclean? Because they eat abominable things and animals that crawl on their belly."

COMPARED TO DUNG

"When ten persons are praying together in one place and they say Kaddisch, or Kedoschah, anyone, even though he does not belong there, may respond Amen. There are some, however, who say that no dung or Akum must be present."

In Iore Dea (198, 4 Hagah, it says:

"When Jewish women come out of a bath they must take care to meet a friend first, and not something unclean or a Christian. For if so, a woman, if she wants to keep holy, should go back and bathe again."

NOT LIKE MEN, BUT BEASTS
In the Tract Makkoth (7b) he is said to be guilty of killing "except when, if intending to kill an animal he kills a man by mistake, or intending to kill a Goi, he kills an Israelite."

WORSE THAN ANIMALS

Rabbi Schelomo Iarchi (Raschi), famous Jewish commentator, explaining the law of Moses (Deuter. XIV, 21) forbidding the eating of meat of wounded animals, but which must be given to the 'stranger in thy gates,' or which, according to Exodus (XXII, 30) is to be thrown to the dogs, has this to say:

"...for he is like a dog. Are we to take to word 'dog' here literally? By no means. For the text in speaking of dead bodies says, Or thou mayest sell it to an alien. This applies much more to the meat of wounded animals, for which it is permitted to accept payment. Why therefore does the Scripture say it may be thrown to 'dogs?' In order to teach you that a dog is to be more respected than the Nokhri."

THEY PROPAGATE LIKE BEASTS

In the Sanhedrin (74b) Tosephoth, it says:

"The sexual intercourse of a Goi is like to that of a beast."

And in Kethuboth (3b) it says:

"The seed of a Goi is worth the same as that of a beast."

Hence it is to be inferred that Christian marriage is not true marriage.

In Kidduschim (68a), it says:

"...How do we know this? Rabbi Huna says: You can read: Remain here with the ass, that is, with a people like an ass. Hence it appears that they are not capable of contracting marriage."

And in Eben Haezer (44, :

"If a Jew enters into marriage with an Akum (Christian), or with his servant, the marriage is null. For they are not capable of entering into matrimony. Likewise if an Akum or a servant enter into matrimony with a Jew, the marriage is null."

In Zohar (II, 64b) it says:

"Rabbi Abba says: If only idolaters alone had sexual intercourse, the world would not continue to exist. Hence we are taught that a Jew should not give way to those infamous robbers. For if these propagate in greater numbers, it will be impossible for us to continue to exist because of them. For they give birth to sucklings the same as dogs."

CHILDREN OF THE DEVIL

In Zohar (I, 28b) we read:

"Now the serpent was more subtle than any beast of the field, etc. (Genes. III, 1.) 'More subtle' that is towards evil; 'than all beasts' that is, the idolatrous people of the earth. For they are the children of the ancient serpent which seduced Eve."(50)

(50) This ancient serpent, the parent of Christians, that is, the devil in the form of a serpent, is called, Sammael (cf. Targum Iobi, XXVIII, 7).

The best argument used by the Jews to prove that Christians are of the race of the devil is the fact that they are uncircumcized.

http://www.talmudunmasked.com/chapter8.htm

False, JC set out to reform the Jewish traditions, keeping what worked and throwing away the rest.
The Jews hated hiim for it and murdered him for it.

The Jews wanted JC dead because he messed up their lunacy.

No one has usurped Judaism, now thats a stretch

 

From wiki

Jewish law, Talmud and Racism
It is an urgent topic, but somehow the wikipedia still lacks any serious discussion about this issue. I came across some site that even concludes that this Holy Book ("The Talmud") is the "Mein Kampf" of the "Chosen People".

well, it seems like an extreme accusation, so it is natural to ask, are there any controversial laws in the Talmud or it is much ado about nothing.

So, with your king permission, let me just quote and discuss some issues in halacha, that in my humble opinion are sort of relevant here.

• "A Jew who rapes a gentile 3-year-old girl, because he raped her viciously, this girl is put to death, because she "brought" shame on the Jewish people, like a case a Jew coupling with an animal, the animal is to be executed as mentioned elsewhere. (Maimonides, chapter 12 of The Laws of Forbidden Relationships, halacha 8-9).[1]
• "Ones' ox that injured a pregnant maidservant and she miscarried, the owner of the ox is exempt from payment for her offspring, for this is similar to injuring a pregnant she-ass".(Maimonides in chapter 11 of The Laws of Monetary Damage, halacha 4).[2]

(This revered scholar even explains himself very well, here is an exact quotation:
"This is our law! And do not find it difficult, and don't be surprised by it, just as one is not surprised about the slaughter of animals even though they have done no harm, for, one in whom human characteristics are not complete is not truly a man, and his end purpose is only for 'man' (i.e. the Jew)". (Maimonides commentary on the Mishnah in Tractate Baba Kama, chapter 4, mishnah 3).

• A Jew who killed a Gentile with intent is not put to death by the Beit Din, as he would be had he killed a Jew. (Maimonides in The Laws of a Murderer and Saving Life, chapter 2, halacha 10-11).[3]

• A gentile who killed a Jew without intent, even though he did it unintentionally, he is put to death.(Maimonidesin chapter 5 of The Laws of a Murderer and Protecting Life, halacha 4)[4]
  
  

TALMUD RACISM?

I'm not sure as whether this information is true or false that's why I didn't bother to edit the Talmud page.

Where a Jew Should Do Evil

Moed Kattan 17a: If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.

Penalty for Disobeying Rabbis

Erubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.

Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God

Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (gentile) hits a Jew, the gentile must be killed.

O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews

Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a gentile ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.

Jews Have Superior Legal Status

Baba Kamma 37b. "If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full."

Jews May Steal from Non-Jews

Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b). Sanhedrin 76a. God will not spare a Jew who "marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean..."

Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews

Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty. What a Jew steals from a gentile he may keep.

Baba Kamma 37b. The gentiles are outside the protection of the law and God has "exposed their money to Israel."

Jews May Lie to Non-Jews

Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile.

Non-Jewish Children are Sub-Human

Yebamoth 98a. All gentile children are animals.

Abodah Zarah 36b. Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.

Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.

Insults Against Blessed Mary

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Talmud/Archive_3


Right out of the Jewish equivalent of the Christian bible!

Then of course the very humanity that the Jews expressly hate are expected to love the Jews for their hared of them in return.

Please get serious!

 

oh, and if you think its bad now? I'd guess its going to get a lot worse, now that the Russians released the ww2 records from their archives and word gets around that the Jewish Holocaust was a lie to cover up the real German Holocaust.

 

Jesus was simply one who submitted to God. “Jew” is a classification that is rooted in ego, and Jesus was so far removed from the ego that he could do things like cure the blind, and talk to animals.

 

Humm, Muslims have Historically not hated Jews (people of the book)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_age_of_Jewish_culture_in_Spain

To the extent that is no longer true, I think that would be related to the Israel -Palestine issue

 

Christians believe Christ had to die in order to save humanity and yet Christians started hating jews because they were responsible for His death . See the incoherence involved. So they should be thankful to the Jews for otherwise Christianity would not exist and they could not be saved.

Islam was created by killing and violence by a war monger. So no surprise. Apparently the god of Christ is not the god of i
Mohammed.

After reading the teachings of Christ it became obvious that Christ was gnogstic and not orthodox . I think the gospel of Thomas are the teachings of Christ and is what Christianity should be based on iinstead of the ideas of Paul.

 

Christ did not submit to god. He was the human body that god used to appear among humanity. Proving that god can live in man and affect the world.

Christ taught that we can all be sons of god by seeking the kingdom within that if found causes a rebirth of consciousness that allows the Will of god to manifest on this ear5h. That consciousness that you say must submit to god dies in order for the rebirth to happen. There is nothing in man left that would submit. Instead god can now dwell in this clean temple. Christ is very clear on this.

But inwardly seeking the inner kingdom requires much more of man than orthodox beliefs require And so man created other ideas and much easier ways of salvation .But they dont change the consciousness of man and he continued on with the killing in the name of god. Man could not be perfect as the father is perfect as Christ told man to be because there was no rebirth. Just self created delusion.

No one seeks the kingdom. They either think a blood sacrifice saves them or they think they must submit And those that believe that are godless and are of satan not god. And murderous bastards.

Can you imagine what this world would be if we could all live by the golden rule? Only people that can live by it are the people who sought and found the kingdom within and were reborn transcending the ego that is the ruler of consciousness for most of us.

 

Delete please.

 

God is the Truth, and Truth is manifested in every instance of creation. As Jesus said, “the kingdom of God is within you!”, meaning that in order for man to attain Truth, one must polish himself of the lower human condition, and then will he see the Light that is within himself.

What must submit is the spirit of man, which inhabits this physical temple for a short time, and our spirit is a testament to God’s Lordship over us. Resistance to this Law will result in a preference for worldly pleasures, and a man will have his attention solely devoted to the affairs of this temporal realm, which stagnates his goal for Truth.

 

They hate because they think of themselves and others, first and foremost, as members of groups rather than individuals

Hate is relatively rare between individuals, but it is the norm between groups.
It is much easier to hate a group than it is to hate an individual.
It is much easier to love an individual than it is to love a group.
Love is pretty much an individual thing; whereas, hate is pretty much a group thing.

Those who think of themselves, or others, first and foremost, as members of groups rather than as individuals are those most likely to hate. Those who regard themselves and others as individuals are those most likely to love.

By the way, if you're looking for the answer to the OP's question in the group affiliation of those cited (Christians), you may want to check your group think.

 

He said man must be reborn .And he explained this did not mean a rebirth of the body. Implying a rebirth. of consciousness itself .That entails a revolutionary change. Which occurs when one seeks and finds the kingdom of god that can only be found within man. Seek and you will find, knock and the door will be opened. This entails something that each person must do. When found the rebirth happens and it fundamentally changes consciousness. No experience no rebirth, no rebirth no salvation.

We may be saying the same thing but with different words.

The change in consciousness involves man's ego no longer ruling over consciousness for the presence of god in consciousness replaces the self centered ego consciousness.

God then interacts with man in this dimension. Using the human vessel.

So a part of the creator lives in all who sought and found His kingdom. You are not god but a son. But a tiny part of his essence limited by the physical vessel. But can now live by the golden rule given the ego no longer is ruler of the body and consciousness.

Order instead of chaos Goodness instead of evil. Right action instead of wrong action. It flows natutally with no effort as if the will of god is imprinted upon your heart.

 

Sure, it can include all of that and more, but it can also be as simple as salvation from the penalty for sin by the grace of God through faith in Jesus Christ.

Pride is an ignorance. It is a very specific ignorance. Pride is the ignorance of one's own subjectivity. Pride is the problem that necessitated the revelation of evil via man's sin. That's why God gave us a law to break, so that when we broke it, our eyes would be opened, and we would know both good and evil. Up until that point, all we knew was good. Sin is not the beginning of our problems; it is the beginning of the solution. Sin is the cure that kills you.

God created one human flesh in Adam. All human bodies have come from that one human flesh. All human bodies are composed of human flesh. God created one human spirit in Adam. All human souls have come from that one human spirit. All human souls are composed of human spirit. Human spirit died in Adam and Eve. Everyone conceived of a man and a woman is conceived with living human flesh and dead human spirit. We are each conceived with living bodies and dead souls. We're already dead; that's why we need to be born again.

God can, and did, take upon Himself our penalty for our sin, but what could not do is to take upon Himself our ignorance of evil. Good is what God is, evil is what God is not. Anything, even God, is revealed just as much by what it is not as it is by what it is. That is why God reveals both good and evil.

Did you know that the devil never sinned? The devil never sinned because he was never given a law to break. The law to not eat from the tree in the center of the garden was given to man not the devil. One can say that the devil has, from the onset of sin, tried to get from sin-by-proxy what man gets from sin directly by getting man to sin. One can say the he continues to try to get from sin-by-proxy what man gets directly - the knowledge of both good and evil. The devil was right in that we would become like God knowing both good and evil. He was jealous of that and still is. God was also right in that when we sinned we would surely die. Because the devil never sinned, evil remains unrevealed to him. To this day, he is left to sincerely believe that he is as good as God. We were well on our way to the same fate as is evidenced by the fact that we sinned before we were sinners.

 

Im pretty sure JC was from the order of Melchizedek:

Hebrews 7 gives much more detail about this. "This Melchizedek was king of Salem and priest of God Most High. He met Abraham returning from the defeat of the kings and blessed him, and Abraham gave him a tenth of everything. First, his name means “king of righteousness”; then also, “king of Salem” means “king of peace.” Without father or mother, without genealogy, without beginning of days or end of life, like the Son of God he remains a priest forever" (Hebrews 7:1-3). A lot of mystery surrounds this priest as he has no record of beginning, end or genealogy. Without these records, one could say he has always and will always exist. Known as both the king of righteousness and the king of peace, these names are descriptive of who he was.

Jesus shares the same attributes attributed to Melchizedek in Hebrews 7. First, he was appointed by God. The previous verses states,“No one takes this honor upon himself; he must be called by God, just as Aaron was. So Christ also did not take upon himself the glory of becoming a high priest. But God said to him, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father.” (Hebrews 5:4-5). Secondly, we see through Jesus' recorded genealogy his eternal existence. Matthew gives an account of Joseph's line. Luke gives an account of Mary's line, but John gives his genealogy as eternal God. "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning" (John 1:1-2). Lastly, the names given to Melchizedek were also given to Jesus. It was Isaiah who prophesied that Jesus would be called prince of peace (Isaiah 9:6). And the author of Hebrews, quoting from the Psalm stated that righteousness would be the scepter of his kingdom (Hebrews 1:8, Psalm 45:6-7).

This is important to us because our faith rests in Jesus and the finished work of the cross. Our faith rests in the fact that he is alive and seated in heaven interceding on our behalf."Because Jesus lives forever, he has a permanent priesthood. Therefore he is able to save completely those who come to God through him, because he always lives to intercede for them" (Hebrews 7:24-25). https://www.jcblog.net/hebrews/5/6/jesus-is-a-priest-in-the-order-of-melchizedek

 

Muslims want everyone to be Muslim, Christians want everyone to be Christian

as long as the Jews do not try to fill the mythical prophecy, they should be safe, once they complete that, they lose evangelical support as they are no longer needed

 

I'd keep reading, but we are already at step 1 and you are failing miserably. Did it never occur to you to, I dunno, look up what Epicureans and Samaritans actually are? No, they aren't Christians. Nor do Christians worship stars and planets. I'll give you this: this is some grade-A self delusion.

The Samaritans were an off-shoot of Judaism that pre-date Christianity. They accepted the Tanack, but rejected oral tradition. Their tradition survives today among Karaite Jews.

The Epicureans followed the (also pre-Christian) philosophy of Epicurus. They rejected the idea of the afterlife, believed that the gods were material beings, believed that there was no reality beyond atoms and the void, and held pain and pleasure to but the ultimate standards of evil and good.

 

nothing like claiming a win and shooting yourself in the foot in the process, think talmud and try to address the point.

 

Lol, I addressed your claim directly. I quoted it. Your claim about the Talmud was that the "Samaritans" and "Epicureans" mentioned therein were Christians. They weren't. I mean, if you want to take your claim back, I guess that's fine. We could then move on to your second claim and see if there is anything to it or if it is as historically illiterate as the first.

 

Things aren't going to get that bad. Most people are rational and informed enough to see this drooling nonsense for the paranoid racist conspiracy theory it is.

 

sure if you can keep the records hidden from them, but the cats out of the bag, isrealis even predict bad times are a comin for them, it goes without saying from the scams. The same scams they have gotten into trouble with since the beginning of time. Apologize till you turn into a pumpkin you cant change the facts. They undermine and take over governments, just like they did in Germany, forcing Hiitler to kick them out of politics, not to mention they started ww2
Wikipedia
This list is incomplete;




Expulsions of Jews in Europe from 1100 to 1600

The following is a list of Jewish expulsions and events that prompted major streams of Jewish refugees.

733 BCE
Samaria (Israel/Judah). King Tiglath-Pileser III deports Jews.[2]

722 BCE
King Sargon II captures and deports Jews.[2] The Assyrians led by Shalmaneser conquered the (Northern) Kingdom of Israel and deports the population to Khorasan. Ten of the twelve Tribes of Israel are considered lost.

597 BCE
The Babylonian captivity. In 537 BCE the Persians, who conquered Babylon two years earlier, allow Jews to return and rebuild Jerusalem and the Temple.[3]

475 BCE
Persia. Haman plots to expel and kill all Jews.[4]

139 BCE
Expulsion from the city of Rome under the accusation of aggressive proselytizing among the Romans.[5]

19 CE
Expulsion from the city of Rome by Emperor Tiberius together with practitioners of the Egyptian religion.[6][7]

41-53 CE
Claudius' expulsion of Jews from Rome.

70 CE
The defeat of the Great Jewish Revolt. Masses of Jews across the Roman Empire enslaved, while many others flee.[8]

119
Large Jewish communities of Cyprus, Cyrene and Alexandria obliterated after the Jewish defeat in Kitos War against Rome. This event caused a major demographic shift in the Levant and North Africa. According to Eusebius of Caesarea the outbreak of violence left Libya depopulated to such an extent that a few years later new colonies had to be established there by the emperor Hadrian just to maintain the viability of continued settlement.[citation needed]

135/6
The Romans suppressed the Bar Kokhba's revolt. Emperor Hadrian expelled hundreds of thousands Jews from Judea, wiped the name off maps, replaced it with Syria Palaestina, and forbade Jews to set foot in Jerusalem.[9]

415
Jews expelled from Alexandria under the leadership of Saint Cyril of Alexandria.[10]

418
Jews expelled from Minorca or asked to convert.[11]

612
Visigothic king Sisebut mandated that every Jew who would refuse for over a year to have himself or his children and servants baptized would be banished from the country and deprived of his possessions.[12]

629
The entire Jewish population of Galilee massacred or expelled, following the Jewish rebellion against Byzantium.

7th century
Muhammad expelled Jewish tribes Banu Qaynuqa and Banu Nadir from Medina, The Banu Qurayza tribe was slaughtered and the Jewish settlement of Khaybar was ransacked.

1012
Jews expelled from Mainz.

1095 – mid-13th century
The waves of Crusades destroyed hundreds of Jewish communities in Europe and in the Middle East, including Jerusalem.[9]

Mid-12th century
The invasion of Almohades brought to end the Golden age of Jewish culture in Spain. Among other refugees was Maimonides, who fled to Morocco, then Egypt, then Eretz Israel.

1276
Jews expelled from Upper Bavaria.[13][14]

12th–14th centuries
France. The practice of expelling the Jews accompanied by confiscation of their property, followed by temporary readmissions for ransom, was used to enrich the crown: expulsions from Paris by Philip Augustus in 1182, from France by Louis IX in 1254, by Philip IV in 1306, by Charles IV in 1322, by Charles V in 1359, by Charles VI in 1394.

13th century
The influential philosopher and logician Ramon Llull (1232–1315) called for expulsion of all Jews who would refuse conversion to Christianity. Some scholars regard Llull's as the first comprehensive articulation, in the Christian West, of an expulsionist policy regarding Jews.

1288
Naples issues first expulsion of Jews in Southern Italy.[15]

1290
King Edward I of England issues the Edict of Expulsion for all Jews from England. The policy was reversed after 365 years in 1655 by Oliver Cromwell.

1293
Destruction of most of the Jewish communities in the Kingdom of Naples.[15]

1360
Jews expelled from Hungary by Louis I of Hungary.[16]

1392
Jews expelled from Bern, Switzerland. Although between 1408 and 1427 Jews were again residing in the city, the only Jews to appear in Bern subsequently were transients, chiefly physicians and cattle dealers.[17]

1421
Jews expelled from the Duchy of Austria at the behest of Albert II of Germany.[18][circular reference]

1442
Jews again expelled from Upper Bavaria.[13]

1478
Jews expelled from Passau.[13]

1491
Jews of Ravenna expelled, synagogues destroyed.[15]

1492
Ferdinand II and Isabella I issued the Alhambra decree, General Edict on the Expulsion of the Jews from Spain (approx. 200,000), from Sicily (1493, approx. 37,000), from Portugal (1496) from Calabria Italy 1554.

1495
Charles VIII of France occupies Kingdom of Naples, bringing new persecution against Jews, many of whom were refugees from Spain.[15]

1496
Jews expelled from Portugal. Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor, issues a decree expelling all Jews from Styria and Wiener Neustadt.

1499
Jews expelled from Nuremberg.[13]

1510
Jews expelled from Naples.[15]

1519
Jews expelled from Regensburg.[13]

1551
All remaining Jews expelled from the duchy of Bavaria. Jewish settlement in Bavaria ceased until toward the end of the 17th century, when a small community was founded in Sulzbach by refugees from Vienna.[13]

1569
Pope Pius V expels Jews from the papal states, except for Ancona and Rome.[15]

1593
Pope Clement VIII expels Jews living in all the papal states, except Rome, Avignon and Ancona. Jews are invited to settle in Leghorn, the main port of Tuscany, where they are granted full religious liberty and civil rights, by the Medici family, who want to develop the region into a center of commerce.[13]

1597
Nine hundred Jews expelled from Milan.[15]

1614
Fettmilch Uprising: Jews are expelled from Frankfurt, Holy Roman Empire, following the plundering of the Judengasse.

1654
The fall of the Dutch colony of Recife in Brazil to the Portuguese prompted the Jewish arrival in New Amsterdam, the first group of Jews to flee to North America.

1669-1670
Jews expelled from Vienna by Leopold I, Holy Roman Emperor and subsequently forbidden to settle in the Austrian Hereditary Lands. The former Jewish ghetto on the Unterer Werd was renamed Leopoldstadt in honour of the emperor and the expropriated houses and land given to Catholic citizens.[19]

1683
Jews expelled from Haiti and all of the other French colonies, due to the Code Noir decree issued by Louis XIV.[20]

1701–1714
War of the Spanish Succession. After the war, Jews of Austrian origin were expelled from Bavaria, but some were able to acquire the right to reside in Munich.[13]

1744–1790s
The reforms of Frederick II, Joseph II and Maria Theresa sent masses of impoverished German and Austrian Jews east. See also: Schutzjude.[citation needed]

1791
The tzarina of Russia Catherine the Great institutes the Pale of Settlement, restricting Jews to the western parts of the empire by means of deportation. By the late 19th century, over four million Jews would live in the Pale.

1862 Tennessee, Mississippi, Kentucky
Jews expelled by Ulysses S. Grant by General Order No. 11.[21]

1880-1910s
Pogroms in the Russian Empire: around 2.5 million Jews emigrated from eastern Europe, mostly to the United States.[22]

1933–1957

First Batch of Refugee children arrive in England from Germany.

Buchenwald survivors arrive in Haifa.
The Nazi German persecution started with the Nazi boycott of Jewish businesses in 1933, reached a first climax during Kristallnacht in 1938 and culminated in the Holocaust of European Jewry. The British Mandate of Palestine prohibited Jewish emigration to Mandatory Palestine. The 1938 Evian Conference, the 1943 Bermuda Conference and other attempts failed to resolve the problem of Jewish refugees, a fact widely used in Nazi propaganda (see also MS St. Louis). A small number of German and Austrian Jewish refugees from Nazism emigrated to Britain, where attitudes were not necessarily positive.[23] Many of the refugees fought for Britain in the Second World War. After WW-II, eastern European Holocaust survivors migrated to the allied-controlled part of Europe, as the Jewish society to which most of them belonged did not exist anymore. Often they were lone survivors consumed by the often futile search for other family and friends, and often unwelcome in the towns from which they came. They were known as displaced persons (also known as Sh'erit ha-Pletah) and placed in displaced persons camps, most of which were by 1951 closed. The last camp Föhrenwald was closed in 1957.

1947–1972

Jewish refugees look out through the portholes of a ship while docked in the port of Haifa.
Iraqi Jews displaced 1951.
The Exodus bringing in refugees.

In the course of the operation "Magic Carpet" (1949–1950), the entire community of Yemenite Jews (called Teimanim, about 49,000) immigrated to Israel.
The Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries, in which the combined population of Jewish communities of the Middle East and North Africa (excluding Israel) was reduced from about 900,000 in 1948 to under 8,000 today, and approximately 600,000 of whom became citizens of Israel. The history of the exodus is politicized, given its proposed relevance to a final settlement Israeli–Palestinian peace negotiations.[24][25][26][27][28][29] When presenting the history, those who view the Jewish exodus as equivalent to the 1948 Palestinian exodus, such as the Israeli government and NGOs such as JJAC and JIMENA, emphasize "push factors", such as cases of anti-Jewish violence and forced expulsions,[24] and refer to those affected as "refugees".[24] Those who argue that the exodus does not equate to the Palestinian exodus emphasize "pull factors", such as the actions of local Jewish Agency for Israel officials aiming to fulfil the One Million Plan,[26] highlight good relations between the Jewish communities and their country's governments,[28] emphasize the impact of other push factors such as the decolonization in the Maghreb and the Suez War and Lavon Affair in Egypt,[28] and argue that many or all of those who left were not refugees.[24][26]

Then UNHCR announced in February 1957 and in July 1967, that these Jews who had fled from Arab countries "may be considered prima facie within the mandate of this office," so according them in international law, as bona fide refugees.[citation needed]

1947
Egypt passed the Companies' Law. This law required that no less than 75% of employees of companies in Egypt must be Egyptian citizens. This law strongly affected Jews, as only about 20% of all Jews in Egypt were Egyptian citizens. The rest, although in many cases born in Egypt and living there for generations, did not hold Egyptian citizenship.[30]

1948
State of Israel established. Antisemitism in Egypt strongly intensified. On May 15, 1948, emergency law was declared, and a royal decree forbade Egyptian citizens to leave the country without a special permit. This was applied to Jews. Hundreds of Jews were arrested and many had their property confiscated. In June through August 1948, bombs were planted in Jewish neighborhoods and Jewish businesses looted. About 250 Jews were killed or wounded by the bombs. Roughly 14,000 Jews left Egypt between 1948–50.[30]

1949
Jordan occupies and then annexes the West Bank – largely allotted by the 1947 UN Partition of Palestine to an Arab state, proposal rejected by the Arab leadership – and conducts large scale discrimination and persecution of all non-Muslim residents – Jewish, Christian (of many denominations), Druze, Circassian, etc. – and forces Arabisation of all public activity, including schools and public administration.[31]

1954
Gamal Abdel Nasser seizes power in Egypt. Nasser immediately arrested many Jews who were tried on various charges, mainly for Zionist and communist activities. Jews were forced to donate large sums of money to the military. Strict supervision of Jewish enterprises was introduced; some were confiscated and others forcibly sold to the government.[30]

1956
Suez Crisis. Roughly 3,000 Egyptian Jews were interned without charge in four detention camps. The government ordered thousands of Jews to leave the country within a few days, and they were not allowed to sell their property, nor to take any capital with them. The deportees were made to sign statements agreeing not to return to Egypt and transferring their property to the administration of the government. The International Red Cross helped about 8,000 stateless Jews to leave the country, taking most of them to Italy and Greece. Most of the Jews of Port Said (about 100) were smuggled to Israel by Israel agents. The system of deportation continued into 1957. Other Jews left voluntarily, after their livelihoods had been taken from them, until only 8,561 were registered in the 1957 census. The Jewish exodus continued until there were about 3,000 Jews left as of in 1967.[30]

1967
Six-Day War. Hundreds of Egyptian Jews arrested, suffering beatings, torture, and abuse. Some were released following intervention by foreign states, especially by Spain, and were permitted to leave the country.[30] Libyan Jews, who numbered approximately 7,000, were subjected to pogroms in which 18 were killed, prompting a mass exodus that left fewer than 100 Jews in Libya.[32]

1970
Less than 1,000 Jews still lived in Egypt in 1970. They were given permission to leave but without their possessions. As of 1971, only 400 Jews remained in Egypt. As of 2013, only a few dozen Jews remain in Egypt.[30]

1960s–1989
Due to the 1968 Polish political crisis thousands of Jews were forced by the communist authorities to leave Poland. See also rootless cosmopolitan, Doctors' plot, Jackson-Vanik amendment, refusenik, Zionology, Pamyat.[citation needed]

1962
Jews flee Algeria as result of OAS violence. The community feared that the proclamation of independence would precipitate a Muslim outburst. By the end of July 1962, 70,000 Jews had left for France and another 5,000 for Israel. It is estimated that some 80% of Algerian Jews settled in France.[33]

1965
Situation of Jews in Algeria rapidly deteriorates. By 1969, fewer than 1,000 Jews remain. By the 1990s, the numbers had dwindled to approximately 70.[33]

1970s–1990s
State-sponsored persecution in the Soviet Union prompted hundreds of thousands of Soviet Jews, known as Refuseniks because they had been denied official permission to leave, to flee; most went to Israel or to the United States as refugees.[34]

2014
Orthodox Jews who fled from Canada after accusations of child sexual abuse expelled from Guatemala by the residents who accused them of not integrating within the culture and damaging the tourism based economy[35]


1100-1600 is only 500 years!

 

Oh yes and that is the typical abbreviated list that you will find from jewish apologists, here is a more complete list far to long to fit within the maximum word limits of a several posts, so here is the link.

https://lordmolyneaux.wordpress.com/2018/05/02/complete-list-of-jewish-expulsions-908/

 

Looks like evil Britain expelled the Jews long before Hitler was born, but then they are the good guys going to save Europe from the evil antisemitist Hitler, it was in the best interest of Britain to expel the Jews so they did, and of course its evil antisemitism for everyone else in the world that tries to follow the British lead and example regardless of circumstance, the Brits also invented concentration (death) camps.



Queen Elizabeth II must sign decree

British Jews be advised: Edict of expulsion still valid
Decree calling for expulsion of Jews from Britain, passed in 13th century, never formally revoked. British Foreign Ministry: No real need to do so

Itamar Eichner|Published: 09.11.06 , 11:13


The Edict of Expulsion, passed by King Edward I in 1290 and calling for all Jews to leave Britain, has never formally been revoked. In order to rescind it, Queen Elizabeth II must sign a contrasting decree.

According to an article published by Israeli historian Ori Katzir on his blog, Aplaton, King Edward I decided in 1290 to evict all Jews from Britain. The reasons for this were many and varied, including blood libel against the Jews.

King Edward signed edicts sent to sheriffs across England, in which he stated that all Jews are to leave the country or to be executed. The signatory date coincided with the Jewish date of Tisha b'Av.

The edict has not been cancelled

Katzir writes, "Although this sounds surprising – even unbelievable – the edict has not been cancelled and is still listed among British legal documents. It was actively in effect for decades until Oliver Cromwell allowed the Jews to return in the middle of the 17th century. In the past 350 years, the British Jewish community has become one of the largest and most thriving in the world, but the edict is still in effect."

Katzir states that it is clear that the edict is a disregarded law, and that England does not behave in accordance to Medieval norms manifested in the decree. However, in theory, the British have the capacity to kick out Israeli Jews, for example, when they come to visit in England.

"All that needs to be done is for the queen to sign a contradictory decree, and this has never been done. I wonder when the Israeli government will appeal to the UK to have Queen Elizabeth II sign such a decree and revoke the edict issued by one of her forefathers."

The British Foreign Ministry issued a response Sunday stating that the ministry's legal advisor doesn't agree that there is a need to revoke the edict.
https://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3302296,00.html

On the other hand Britain after destroying the German democracy, lead by the Zionist Jews ushered in a Jewish theocratic government in Germany that has extreme freedom of speech violations and punishes anyone speaking out against Jews as antisemitists and they are thrown in jail to shut them up to insure their historical facts are snuffed out from public review.

 

Britain insured that the Jews had a homeland after the war, which was a part of the conditions the U.S. put for them entering WWII.

That forgives any prior offence I would think.

Regards
DL

 

nothing so glamorous, rothschild (by far the wealthiest family on the planet, then and now) owns several properties in israel and wanted protection. The jewish political arm, the zionists wanted a home state. The US and britain wanted a presence in the middle east for our own operations.

There is nothing altruistic going on here, its all about the usual, money and power. Everything governments do is calculated and about money and power.

if Nathaniel was King, Walter was his heir. It was to Walter Rothschild that Balfour sent the Declaration because, for much of the preceding year, Walter had been actively promoting Zionism in company with Chaim Weizmann. Walter has long been described first and foremost as a zoologist who collected exotic birds and animals; a reluctant banker; a very shy man with a speech impediment. [5] The evidence from which we have analysed the Balfour Declaration stands testament to a different truth. It was Walter Rothschild who allegedly drafted and redrafted letters to foreign secretary Balfour in 1917. [6] Be mindful that the Declaration passed through at least 5 drafts. At the very least, if say, Weizmann drafted these letters in Walter’s name, it had the Rothschild signature. Walter opposed the idea that power in Palestine might be shared between Britain and France and, Weizmann claimed, believed that Palestine must become a British Protectorate. [7]


Later, Jacob, the 4th Lord Rothschild described his grandfather Walter as a deeply eccentric ornithologist who, for example, did not open any mail over a two year period because he didn’t want to communicate with the rest of the world. [8] Well, he clearly opened Balfour’s letter. Walter did not flinch when confronted by Jewish opponents to political Zionism. He tackled them head-on. He wrote to The Times on several occasions to condemn leading Jewish opponents. When the presidents of the Jewish Board of Deputies and the Anglo-Jewish Association published what he deemed to be a manifesto against Zionism, both he and Weizmann wrote stinging letters of condemnation. Walter Rothschild then had the authors of the letter censured at the next meeting of the Board of Deputies and used his father’s name to justify his position. Whether he was a led in such matters by Weizmann or not, changes nothing. https://firstworldwarhiddenhistory....r-declaration-12-the-hand-of-the-rothschilds/


Russian TV News Item On Rothschild Family Uses Nazi Footage

Click here to view this video clip on MEMRI TV

'Money, which Rules the World'

Narrator: "In the days of the Internet, this old photo of a cart with four zebras usually bears the caption: What do you know about luxury? The year is 1895. Lord Walter Rothschild rides a (cart) with zebras in London's Piccadilly, violating one of the rules of his own clan, rules presumably introduced by the clan's founder Mayer Amschel: Never forget that modesty leads to riches. It is not known whether the first Rothschild actually wrote this, but there is a special gallery in the British Museum devoted to the riches of another family member, Ferdinand Rothschild - gold and precious gems. The Rothschilds made their fortune from gold, first by charging interest on gold coins of Germany's dukes, followed by major bank speculations worldwide. In fact, they have started to buy up the central banks of the European countries. There was a joke back in the 19th century: There is a British Empire, a Prussian Empire, a Russian Empire, and the Rothschilds. As a result, the Rothschilds currently hold shares of the U.S. Federal Reserve, of the Bank of England - here you see a recent visit by Queen Elizabeth - and of dozens of major banks worldwide. This is the richest, and at the same time the most mysterious, family in the world. Another rule of the Rothschilds is: Never disclose the family's assets, not in a court, nor in a will. This rule has never been violated. The estimate of the Rothschild fortune is based on rumor alone: about 3.5 trillion dollars, which is more than the British GDP." May 12, 2017 Special Dispatch No.6922

Sounds about right since before 1890, an audit, at least an actual audit of what they could find, the rothschilds were worth over 8 billion. If there ever was a reason to have a law there you have it. When rothschild scratches his zipper countries flock to their knees!

Anyone who does not is dead.

 

the jews paid the italians to take out jesus because he was a christian

they did this because jesus kicked them out of his church for money changing, meaning christians can't profit unless jews get a cut.

today everyone is in on the racket, even the moslems