Jim Jordan calls this a pre-determined impeachment, tensions near boiling point

I took an oath to preserve and defend the Constitution. That's a punchline to your orange mongoloid hero, but it means something tangible to me.

Bonespurs is lining his oversized pockets as president, and he's never met a law that he didn't want to take a dump on.

Good riddance to him. Your supremacist buddies can also crawl under the next available rock after he's gone, too.

 

How can Obama use it?

 

Let’s hope so.

 

Then prove it.

 

Read the transcripts of the testimony, and then draw honest (not bullshit) inferences from Bonespurs' refusal to comply with congressional subpoenas coupled with the testimony and documentary evidence.

It's been proven, alright.

 

Don't refer to the transcripts and tell me "its proven". State from the transcripts what it is that proves your case.

 

It's not my case, and I don't need to "prove" it to some anonymous guy on the internet who hasn't bothered to inform himself, and who doesn't seem to understand how the House is entitled to construe evidence.

Do your own work.

 

What a great counter-point.

 

already done

 

Bbbbbbbbut you need to prove it to his satisfaction, and stuff!

The testimony was clear, consistent and compelling. The testimony, the documentary evidence and the inferences that anyone with a clue can draw from the testimony, documentary evidence and the fact that Bonespurs is illegally obstructing the inquiry is more than enough evidence to support impeachment.

 

A fetus is a fetus and a baby is a baby, that's why there's two different words for them

 

What a laughable response. You made the claim - I said prove your claim - and now you are asking me to prove your claim for you.

What a pile of fallacious gibberish.

 

Twirling around in a circle crying "its been proven" is not proof of claim - nor does saying "read the transcripts is proven there".

 

The point of an abortion - in most cases - is to end the pregnancy prior to the creation of a baby. Duh.

 

Engaging in corrupt behavior and pressing a foreign ally into announcing a sham investigation into a political rival in order to harm his prospects in a coming election is not investigating possible corruption.

 

Babies are born persons. Aborting a baby is impossible. It's a fetus until it's born.

https://www.merckmanuals.com/en-ca/home/women-s-health-issues/normal-pregnancy/stages-of-development-of-the-fetus​

Hope this helps.

 

There is plenty to see. It's breathtaking to watch the Democrats attempt to turn the United States into a banana republic.

 

It's a human life at conception. Abortion terminates a human life.

 

Agreed. I'd love to see the Democrats performance in a Senate trial. All their so-called evidence which consists of nothing but hearsay and presumption would not be allowed in. And let's see Adam Schiff explain why he voted to require a court order to release phone data but didn't bother to follow the law when he recently released Nunes et. al. phone records.

 

I have been through this with a few women who killed my child. Hope that helps you understand.

 

Schiff is actually in serious legal trouble. It may take years, but he may eventually end up behind bars.

 

That gives me that warm feeling this December here in Idaho.

 

Lock him up !!! Lock him up !!! Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy. If you haven’t seen it already check out Tom Shillue’s impression of Schiff on the Gutfield show.

 

*LOL*

Dude, that made no sense.

 

Do I have to re-try other historical cases for you, too?

Of course not. You ignoring all of the evidence doesn't make it magically disappear, nor does it mean that I have to lay it all out for you when the House has already done so.

The only laughable posts have been yours. The House doing its job doesn't suddenly become my job because you don't know what you're talking about.

"Uh, like prove an overwhelming, uh, case to me, and stuff!"