"Justice Thomas: SCOTUS should reconsider contraception"

It's actually happened in 235 cases in 233 years. Some standing longer than RvW. LINK: The Supreme Court has overturned hundreds of its own decisions. Here are some of the most consequential reversals. (msn.com)

 

More than once per year. That makes it pretty common. I think this one is the most emotional one, though.

 

Calling one man a sellout to his race is not a racist act...

But if you prefer, I'll let somebody probably better qualified go at it for a while...

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/n...-jackson-clarence-thomas-roe-wade-1235172020/

But... on the bright side, you sound JUST like the person mentioned in that article... somebody named Ted Cruz... have you heard of him??

 

Translation: You caught me. Look, a squirrel.

 

Yeah poor people don't go to public school and use outhouses.

Abortion mill is a thing. Selling dead fetal tissue is big bucks.

 

It's not inflammatory at all, it's a fact.

https://www.seattletimes.com/nation...-fetal-tissue-acquired-from-abortion-clinics/

No, not an opinion, it's a fact. Unless you're suggesting human beings are first some other species before they're born, and then they become humans as they travel the vaginal canal and are transformed suddenly into human beings.

There's zero difference between an unborn child and a one week/one month/one year old baby. The only difference is where it is located when you kill it.

That you called it a mother was a bit of a freudian slip on your part, as that's an acknowledgment, deep down, that you know what it is.

Oh I have plenty of evidence on the irresponsibility of those that use abortion as birth control.

 

Did you just call Samuel L. Jackson a squirrel?? He seems like a pretty cool guy to me, but if you want to rodentize a solid American actor, that's on you....

 

So not an Uncle Thomas in your opinion like the other guy.

 

Your guy is Uncle Thomas...

My guy is Uncle Sam

 

Your side is already talking about national bans, the most far right states are saying their citizens should not be allowed to go out of state to have an abortion.
Will you vote against these policies and against individuals that support these policies?

I think it is morally reprehensible that the right believe women should not have the basic right of bodily autonomy especially seeing the fuss made about masks and vaccines. If it was just saving a “life” very few would disagree but you are stripping away one of the most fundamental freedoms known to man (and not it isn’t the biggest gun you can find) the right to control one’s body.

 

The difference between a zygote / fetus at certain parts and a child is that one is sentient, has a developed central nervous system and brain, can feel, process and retain new information and has functioning organs.

Do you just think this just all occurs immediately once a fertilization occurs?

 

Uncle Clarence wants to revisit everything except Loving vs Virginia.

 

Spun what ??

It isn't new it is derived from two separate DNA, it is transformed.

 

The accusation that you made, was that DEMOCRATS, specifically, have a vested interest in the "abortion industry."

vman12 said: ↑
Democrats want an abortion industry. They make money killing the unborn.


I read your moderately long article, and nowhere in it, did I see the connection of selling fetal tissue, made to "Democrats." Therefore, your claim was not only inflammatory, but false.

Since your promoting of a source, as proving a fact, of which it makes no mention, demonstrates your inability to objectively assess what you are reading, I am not going to invest more time, in what your first link has indicated, will be a fruitless search, for your supposed vindication. Therefore, I will ask for what should not be seen as an excessive bar, to your proving your point: if you have already, purportedly, identified articles which support your argument, I will ask that you kindly supply a relevant SNIP, along with your link, to show that it is not just another baseless, wild goose chase, on which you are sending me.

I expect that your response, to my requiring this slight extra effort from you-- instead of your accepting the opportunity to absolutely confirm your arguments (if your other sources were not, also, bullshit)-- will be to complain that this is "not your job," to actually show the proof of your claims. If this turns out to be the actual progression of our debate, I will offer my reaction, now, to your assertions, that there really is evidence to substantiate your charges, if only I am willing to dig for it:

Yawn.

 

Do think he's figured out that he's married to a very VERY light skinned black woman yet?

 

He's been an honorary white guy for so long he forgot he's black.

 

Great example of what a racist would say!

 

Are you a card carrying member of the KKK?

 

LOL, whut?

do you know what a racist is?

 

Yep. I pointed out one.

 

Clearly not... it's just a word they're told to use when the conversation runs against their narrative...

 

They have cards?? Do they have pictures (without sheets) and can you use them as voter ID??

 

Lol, apparently not.

 

You sound disappointed that you didn't get one.

 

I don't have a side and I don't vote. Politics is politics. I didn't invent it. Take it up with those who want to do what you don't want to do.

I think it is morally reprehensible to engage in homicide.