Latest AGW Guess

Discussion in 'Environment & Conservation' started by longknife, Aug 12, 2014.

  1. livefree

    livefree Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2004
    Messages:
    4,205
    Likes Received:
    28
    Trophy Points:
    48
    More delusional blather. "Observational science" completely supports AGW.

    [​IMG]

    NOAA: Past Decade Warmest on Record According to Scientists in 48 Countries
    Earth has been growing warmer for more than fifty years
     
  2. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, cartoons are proof now eh?
     
  3. cjm2003ca

    cjm2003ca Active Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2011
    Messages:
    3,648
    Likes Received:
    16
    Trophy Points:
    38
    i thought the article was very informative..i never knew it got warmer in the summer....
     
  4. jc456

    jc456 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,407
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    that's climate change.

    - - - Updated - - -

    So, again, what is the issue you're so afraid of and can you prove it? Prove it, naw, and instead of providing data that actually supports your claim, you babble about with mumbo jumbo and cartoons. LoSiNg
     
  5. contrails

    contrails Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2014
    Messages:
    4,454
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You need to brush up on your math there Hoosier8. If you deposit $1,000 a month into your bank account, while withdrawing $1,100 at the same time, are you going to tell me that the $200 interest the bank gives you doesn't explain why your account is growing instead of shrinking? The 30 gigatons of annual human CO2 emissions don't have to explain all 3,000 gigatons of CO2 in Earth's atmosphere, just the extra 15 gigatons being added each year.
     
  6. contrails

    contrails Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2014
    Messages:
    4,454
    Likes Received:
    24
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Svante Arrhenius and Guy Calendar figured it out long before computers, much less computer models. Please try again.
     
  7. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Figured out what, that the models are not matching the observations?
     
  8. Lord of Planar

    Lord of Planar New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2014
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's about it. The science has progressed, but they still cannot properly model or determine CO2 sensitivity in a complex global system.
     
  9. Lord of Planar

    Lord of Planar New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2014
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    FYI, before 2008, I came up with an absolute maximum sensitivity for a doubling of CO2 at about 0.55 degrees Celsius. This paper quantifies it at 0.43 degrees: http://www.scipublish.com/journals/ACC/papers/download/3001-846.pdf

    [​IMG]

    I have this image in a November 2008 thread in another forum that that I may have created as long as ten years ago.
     
  10. jackdog

    jackdog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    19,691
    Likes Received:
    384
    Trophy Points:
    83

    Teacher teacher I know I know ! It's the same thing that has been causing hurricanes, floods, droughts, tornadoes and famines since the beginning of recorded history
     
  11. PeakProphet

    PeakProphet Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,055
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Are you implying that they correctly predicted the stable global temperatures of the past nearly 2 decades?
     
  12. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, guess, that is what science is. It starts with a guess followed by observation that either validates or falsifies the guess. Looks like you may be one of the scientifically ignorant if you don't know that.
     

Share This Page