Someone on the internet (it may have been here) had an image of a book cover that read: “Everyone I Disagree With Is A Nazi” (a beginner’s guide to debating politics on the internet). Hilarious.
any one notice a pattern with the post by our liberal forum members on this thread they all start out condemning the violence then they all write a "but" then go on to excuse the violence
To my knowledge few if any conflicts between Leftists and Republicans have ever resulted in serious injuries. These people are mostly young adult men who are looking for an excuse to fight. In the same manner as drunken fans fight at sporting events. The police in Portland intervened and arrested a few of the most aggressive offenders. What I don't appreciate during these kinds of violent outbursts is for students/ antifa, etc to go on a rampage and destroy property like they did in Berkeley when Milo Yiannopoulos appeared on campus.
Watching people justify the tools of violence and hate being used against people they consider to be using the tools of violence and hate. /shrug
Nobody cares about antifa except a few thugs in Portand, and the right wing. They are just a bunch of thugs. This isn't even a political issue. They also have a bunch of nuts like patriot prayer, and the 3% ers marching through the streets with weapons. They know damn well they're baiting the antifa nuts. This has nothing to do with peaceful marches. They are all trying to make trouble. They are all thugs. And they are all a bunch of nuts.
Hmm. I always thought it was funny when Republicans keep trying to relate racism to modern day Democrats because of the Dixiecrats. Who are now Republicans.
It is important to keep perspective. Violent clashes between Americans occur during unstable periods. Police used water hoses/ dogs on innocent Blacks peacefully demonstrating for human rights in the 1960's. Now we have a criminally behaved president whose very presence triggers intense dislike/ outrage. I've read comments from normally peace-loving people who become uncharacteristically aggressive when dealing with Trump supporters. To associate with Trump in Portland and elsewhere means consequences. Ngo lost his job for promoting hatred against Muslims. That's the cost of being overtly Republican today. Steven Mnuchin, secretary of the treasury, often gets hounded in public when he returns to his home in California. His wife has sort of apologized for being too close to Trump.
yet they outnumber the KKK but when you have the one or two KKK marches a year you liberals lose your heads
only two Dixiecrats switch to republican the rest stayed democrat hell one of those that stayed democrats was a grand dragon leader of a KKK chapter
I see reports indicate that there were a "few dozen" right wing racists in comparison to "hundreds" of angry students/ young people. Those antifa kids don't have a police record for being thugs but can't control their outrage. When KKK is anywhere on the West Coast, immediate conflicts break out and the racists have to be rescued by the police and escorted out of town.
Yep. "Only 2". *LOL* https://www.history.com/news/how-the-party-of-lincoln-won-over-the-once-democratic-south
Tell us what the stated purpose of a KKK march is in 2019, and I'll let you know how my head reacts...
here is a list of the congresses Dixiecrats Orval Fabus Benjamin Travis Laney John Stennis James Eastland Allen Ellender Russell Long John Sparkman John McClellan Richard Russell Herman Talmadge George Wallace Lester Maddox John Rarick Robert Byrd Al Gore, Sr. Bull Connor here are the only three that switched to republican Thurmond Helms Godwin so I will admit I did make a mistake it wasn't two it was three so we had 3 out of 16 that switched parties the rest remained democrats so that pretty much blows that tired old myth out of the water that the racist democrats switched parties when the vast majority remained democrat including Byrd who was a card carrying KKK grand dragon
You're missing the point, my friend. Who elects our congressmen? The answer to that question is responsive to your claim.
the democrats that elected those racist Dixiecrats remained voting democrat they didn't switch parties either because if they did those Dixiecrats that remained in the democrat party wouldn't have been reelected so you need to explain how did those 13 Dixiecrats that stayed democrat keep getting reelected on the democrat ticket? proof again it is a myth that the racist democrats switched parties a myth created by the left to cover for democrats being racist trying to off load their racism onto the republicans
Yes, they did. You are revising history here. It's well documented about the Democrats owning slaves and the Dixiecrat movement: https://freedomsjournalinstitute.org/latest-news/history/urban-legends-the-dixiecrats-and-the-gop/ The Republican party was formed specifically to stop the Democrats and their spread of slavery across the United States.
so you are saying that the racist democrats that voted for those Dixiecrats switched to republican but contained to vote democrat? good luck trying to convince rational people that absurdity so I will ask again how did those 13 Dixiecrats that stayed democrat keep getting reelected on the democrat ticket?
So what you’re saying is that the hate among liberals is so strong they can’t control their savagery, right?
Lol...Indeed. They just sentenced the goose-stepping nazi racist who murdered the woman during the Charlottesville protests with his car to life in prison.
It like a "hot potato". Republicans want to throw it back to Dixiecrats but Dixiecrats don't exist anymore. So what's the argument? Stop ignoring the reality of Nixon's "southern strategy". The racism ball is in your corner, either destroy it or it will destroy you in elections.