Lesbian woman demands double standard when she has sex with 15-year-old

Only if she is convicted. She may get lucky in court. No pun intended.

 

Oh BS.. Show me someone who loves young boys and I'll show you a homosexual. Homos are perverts and just sick for the most part. They swing big dildos around in public like it's a day at Six Flags or something and use some of the most foul language. I feel bad for the gays that aren't like that because they are outnumbered by the crazy perverts and are getting a bad name. But they won't stand up against it, so I only feel so bad and then just accept that they are getting what they deserve for taking them into the ranks just to get the numbers in their movement up. Now we have homosexuals who think they are above the law and should be able to fondle whoever and whatever they want to. It's only going to get worse and I look forward to them destroying their entire movement.

 

Well you would just be showing yoursel to be a homophobe.

You claimed that most 'pedo's are gay and that is of course just a falsehood promoted by homophobes to attack homosexuals.

As you are well aware- the large majority of all victims of pedophiles are girls- attacked by men- if you were consistant you would call them heterosexuals, but in reality they are pedophiles- vile men who attack children.

You care about the issue only as a tool to attack homosexuals. Which is really a shame.

I rather doubt you are sympathetic towards any homosexuals, given your other statements.

Oh I am sure you will be a major force in 'destroying their entire movement' ....lol

Meanwhile once again- contrary to your claims: majority of pedophiles- men who attack girls.

And of course- homophobes love spreading lies about homosexuals in order to attack them.

 

I think I get it, you think I give a crap about splitting hairs. I don't. The woman is a sexual predator and homosexual pervert, and she should be executed because of that, but since she is a member of the "in vogue" group, she will probably get a slap on the wrist.

 

I don't even see this a gay issue. This highlights the difference between how men are treated versus women. If this were a man - gay or straight - instead of a cute blonde girl they would have thrown the book at him.

 

Splitting hairs You can think that if it allows you to feel good about your self.

The examples you gave are not comparable to this situation, due to the Romeo and Juliet law.

Sucks when your logic gets beat eh?

 

if Romeo and Juliet laws applied in this case, this wouldn't be news right now. It's obvious, you are the trying to apply another state's laws to this state's situation, and therefore, it's your logic that has been beat, eh.

In this state, she's a child predator. She is now simply trying get off on a technicality and spin this into a gay rights issue (to distract from the fact that she had illegal sex with a child)

- - - Updated - - -

I wouldn't have either, until the 18 y.o.'s mother turned it into one by accusing the state and the victim's parents of pursuing the charges so hard only because she was gay.

 

This thread is proof positive that the gay agenda is in full swing and they want special rights.
Would the gays be all up in arms if this had been an 18 year old boy and a 14 year old girl?
Nope.
Would people be beating the drum of Romeo and Juliette laws?
Nope.
But the girls are saying they are gay, so that makes all the difference.
Now we need special laws and conciderations to keep the gays from getting all in a twist.

 

This was covered in Post #332:

So no one is trying to apply another states laws. Perhaps you should take the time and research the laws instead of tasting feet.

- - - Updated - - -

And this thread would have never started if it was an 18 y/o male and a 15 y/o girl. This is nothing but the catholic mafia at play here.

There is no gay agenda. Just creatures of the mind in homophobes minds.

 

Catholic Mafia? I like that.
But here is were you go off the tracks again. This is the south, mostly nouveau christians and baptists.
And guess what, its not a gay issue. Its a crimnal issue.

 

I see.... It still does not mean they can have sex with a 15 y.o. (taken from your quoted posted) it just means they can get the predator tag removed 10 years from when the sentence is completed.


so, Romeo and Juliet does not condone this. The act is still illegal, and the girl is still a sexual predator. She is fighting the label by saying it's a gay witch hunt. But it's not a gay witch hunt, it's a child predator punishment, which she is under Florida law.

 

The OP of the tread is a catholic. The OP would not have posted this thread if it wasn't a homosexual case. Hence the catholic mafia reference.

And on the criminal issue, I've yet to see anyone post a comparable story on a heterosexual case. And no, 20 and 22 y/o's do not count (R&J law)

 

where in Florida did this happen again? not to derail the topic by anymeans... but I thought s. Florida was more catholic than baptists (due to the increase in latino population)


Not that it would matter to who you are responding to, they just want to bash 'religion' in general and picked Catholic because it's the largest.

 

failure to find /= doesn't exist. it's just not as newsworthy and gets lost on the back page. Mainly because the 18 y .o. male's parents don't start saying it's an agenda driven witch hunt and calls the victim and her parents names.

 

There is not a 10 year waiting period for the predator tag to be removed. That was on the books PRIOR to the R&J law.

I brought up the R&J law to show that we do treat an 18y/o differently (legally) than a 21 y/o under the law.

And I'm still waiting on a post that shows a situation between a 18 y/o male and a 15 y/o female. No one can produce one. This is nothing but a witch hunt, started by the 15 y/o parents.

- - - Updated - - -

 

Sebastian/Vero area, about 50 miles south of Cape Canaveral. No where near "south Florida".

 

it's ALLLLL south Florida to me... lol

 

Yeah, they want us to pretend marriage has nothing to do with procreation, and yet they want to exclude closely related couples because of the potential of procreation and the detremental genetic effects, EVEN if they are of the same sex. They still want prosecuted 18 yr old boys who have sex with 14 yr old girls, because of the potential of procreation. But see no need to do so in the case of two females because of the impossibility of procreation.
They want all the tax breaks and governmental entitlements that go along with marriage, without any of the responsibilities.

 

Clearly you aren't familiar what 'proof positive' constitutes.

This is it. No one is arguing that this girl should get special treatment because she is gay- her mom- presumably straight- is arguing that she is being treated differently because she is gay.

But if by the 'gay agenda' meaning calling for homosexuals to be treated equally- yes- the gay agenda is succeeding.

 

And once again- if the 18 year old had been a man- the OP would never have started this thread.

I agree its not a gay issue- no matter how much the homophobes want it to be.

 

Ah jumping in with the marriage= procreation again.

Shall we review again the complete lack of relationship between marriage and procreation?

And by the way- homosexuals want all the tax breaks and governmental entitlements that go along with marriage, along with all of the responsibilities.

That is the reason why every child a homosexual couple has in their family is a desired child. Homosexuals make the conscious decision everytime they decide to bring a child into their family. Meanwhile- heterosexuals have children by accident or by design, in marriage or outside of marriage.

 

I've always thought statutory rape laws are kind of dumb. But I don't think this case warrants any kind of exception. Off to jail with her.

 

and that's fine... everyone starts threads based on their beliefs. And this person starting this thread has NOTHING to do with your support of a gay child predator..... it just simply exposes it.

 

in a link on the thread, she's with some boy in "stop the hate" shirts with rainbow emblems.... so yes, I think she's pretty open about being gay.


and I'm not sure who you are including in your 'homophobe' stereotype..... so I have to assume it means the typical "anyone who doesn't agree with pro-gay agenda" to which I proudly belong.... so I will answer your challenge and say YES, yes I do support the same punishment for an 18 y.o. boy / 14 y.o. girl as I do in this case

 

This is what I posted, I dont know where all the other parts came from.