LIVE: BREAKING Nevada GOP ELECTORS CAST VOTES FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP!!

I think the video you are referring to was from Georgia, and the state of Georgia investigated this and found nothing wrong.
You are believing a lie. You are an easy pick because you want it to be true, so you believe anything that is supporting of your already formed opinion and dismissing anything opposed. Don't ask for proof as I have provided more links than I should have already, but many won't read them.
The voter fraud in the 2020 election is a real as the Easter Bunny. If you want to convince me, please provide a supportable argument using facts and actual data.
Bet you can't!

 

CNN? LOL! Talk about a fantasy world!

 

Here's Faux with the same report, giving CNN credit...

https://www.fox8live.com/2021/12/07/pences-former-top-aide-cooperating-with-jan-6-panel/

Seems you are the one with the media problem....

 

You think another cable news show gives CNN credibility?

 

No, I think the reports, combined with the logic of Short participating without coercion after his admired boss was threatened AND the absence of denials from either party, makes it highly likely to be true...

I imagine Short will have an interesting tale to tell about the level of pressure put on Pence to sidestep the law that day.... COS is a very involved position...

He's absolutely at the top of witnesses I want to see testify live...

 

LOL! Phony reports, phony witnesses, phony news.....

 

They appeared to be harvested ballots which aren't counted in Iowa since one can't verify harvested ballots.

 

You initially said this happened in Detroit, not in Iowa. It actually didn't happen in either. It "happened" (well, the fabrication happened) in Georgia. And they weren't "harvested ballots."

 

Pretty sure those ballots I refer to were from the Detroit precinct...Could it be that harvested ballots were used in other precincts in the US??

Furthermore, a state or precinct election official unequivocally stating their election is free and fair in a pandemic rules and remote balloting type of election like the 2020 election (which was unprecedented in its pandemic rules and remote balloting) is like the ICE agent unequivocally stating they know how many illegals have crossed into the US during the Biden Administration...Which is to say election officials have no clue if their elections are free and fair due to pandemic rules and remote balloting and ICE agents have no clue how many illegals have passed into the US under the Biden Administration.

 

You claimed it was Detroit, then you claimed it was Iowa. It was Georgia. And it is fake news.

 

I posted I worked as a precinct official in Iowa (not in the 2020 election).

 

So why did you bring up Iowa in post #107? Why does Iowa matter if this didn't happen in Iowa? And, again, this was in Georgia, not Detroit or Iowa, and there is no evidence that they were "harvested" ballots.

 

This.

 

Georgia. Not Detroit or Iowa. No evidence they were "harvested." Fake news.

 

I brought up Iowa because I've had some extensive experience in Iowa validating voting ballots making me kinda an expert in the field of ballot validation in Iowa at the precinct level and not during the 2020 election.

Remote ballots can't be validated. Harvested ballots can't be validated. The best way to validate ballots is in person at a precinct location, for example.

 

This happened in Georgia. Not Detroit. Not Iowa. There is no evidence that there was anything even slightly wrong with them. It was a fake news story that you fell for.

 

I never posted it happened in Iowa. I quite clearly remember harvested ballots being pulled out from tables in a Detroit precinct. Could it be that harvested ballots were used in more than one precinct?? Duh?

 

If it didn't happen in Iowa, then your post #107 makes no sense. And you are thinking of Georgia, not Detroit. And there's no evidence that they were "harvested" ballots. It was all fake news from people who refused to do homework and decided that their delusions were more fun than facts.

There's a reason you are incapable of discussion any evidence of your claims. A good reason.

 

Why don't you read post #115? I posted it before your post I just quoted.

 

I've already addressed it. I've already responded to it. The video you are talking about was from Georgia, not Detroit, and there is no evidence that they were "harvested" ballots or that they were in any way compromised. You are relying entirely on the bottom barrel of fake news.

 

I doubt you're that knowledgeable to recognize a harvested ballot nor knowledgeable to realize that harvested ballots can't be verified.

 

Feel free to post the video if you disagree. I doubt you're that willing to rely on facts over fake news rumors.

 

You say there weren't harvested ballots in the Detroit precinct...Were there harvested ballots in the other precinct?

Why is this not enough reasonable doubt of a free and fair 2020 election to warrant an investigation into the 2020 election?

 

No, I said the fake news video you were talking about was from Georgia, not Detroit, and had nothing to do with "harvested" ballots. If you want an investigation, make a case for one. Until then, all you have are feelings and conspiracy theories.

 

The observation still seems pertinent that removing Trump is more important to you than a free and fair election since you allowed the same types of conspiracy theories, the lies, innuendo and gossip to fuel the investigation into the Trump campaign and the two Trump impeachments but you demand factual data to investigate the 2020 election or any election.