Male Sexual Orientation Influenced by Genes?

What sex is an XY Female? What sex is an XX Male?

This one, XY.

So, male or female?

 

Cannibalism and murder, by their very nature, violate another person's civil rights. Incest has high risks of creating infants with abnormalities; if this weren't the case, I doubt anyone would care about it.

Homosexuality violates no one's civil rights and has no risk of creating abnormal infants.

The comparison is absurd, but you knew that already.

 

Yes Wake Up, you should.... wake up. This thread is about sexual orientation. It's not about intersexuality or gender identity. Do you understand the difference or are you that confused. And what the hell is the " gay mofo" and what exactly are you sick of?

 

I agree. In keeping with requirements of the PPACA and homosexuality being an identification with the opposite sex, the PPACA should MANDATE corrective medical action to resolve the sexual identity crisis.

 

The absurdity is you pretending your explanations change the fact that they all exist in nature but no one is stupid enough to pretend those conditions are natural.

Why can't you just admit something existing in nature does not make it natural? Is it just too much for you to admit the obvious?

 

DNA indicates sex. Gender is defined by the individual. Masculine and feminine has nothing whatsoever to do with genetics, it has more to do with behavior.

A man "getting in touch with his feminine side" doesn't involve DNA manipulation.

 

It's hard to admit such complete tripe. If it exists naturally than it's nature. Unless you can prove homosexuals are artificially homosexual, I.e. created in a lab, assembled or manufactured. You are dead wrong.

Learn what the word you are abusing means.

 

you don't really know what homosexuality is. Gender identity crisis is part of transgender. Homosexuals don't really identify with the opposite sex.

 

Because it's irrelevant to the argument, like I've said to you probably a dozen times, so you really can stop pretending like you don't already know how I'm going to respond. Whether or not homosexuality is natural doesn't matter. Even if it's a lifestyle choice, which I've always believed it is (although if science proves my opinion wrong, I'll have to change my opinion), homosexuals still deserve equal treatment under the law.

 

Sorry, I 'm confused. This thread is about "Male Sexual Orientation Influenced by Genes" Sexual Orientation. Why are you bringing up "sexual identity " and what mandatory treatment would you propose?

 

LOL By that moronic definition me going to my car is natural because it existed in nature. You really need to think these things through.

So you are admitting you believe rape incest murder and cannibalism are all natural right Poly? Step up to the plate.

- - - Updated - - -

Actually it matters a great deal.

Which they get. You want them to have special rights only for their adult marriages while excluding all other sexual preferences but can't explain why or where in the Constitution that is allowed. That's the problem with your argument.

 

Your car isn't natural, unless you think they grow on trees.

Just so you know, cars aren't birthed on ranches and raised until they are trucked to the dealership, nor do they grow on vines to be harvested at proper ripeness. So being that you car was manufactured by humans in a factory so your car can't exist in nature. Being that homosexuals aren't assembled in a factory, itis reasonable to assume that they are natural. No evidence suggests that they aren't.

Yes those things are natural. Many animal species participate in all those behaviors, our species would be no different.

Natural doesn't necessarily mean good. Your concept of nature is a fallacy.

 

Considering all the recent news about same-sex marriage, apparently not.

We've been through this before on a different thread. Same-sex marriage doesn't exclude heterosexuals from marrying people of the same sex. You couldn't provide any evidence that any laws allowing same-sex marriage specifically excluded heterosexuals then, and you won't be able to now.

 

The younger generations seem to have no problem with homosexuality, and they will certainly outlive you and me.

 

OK, you're off on another subject.

 

No, that was the original point, it just went over your head.

 

No, you just want to argue your own point. Start a new thread or something.

 

No special rights- as per the protections of the 14th Amendment we all have equal protection.

As established by Supreme Court rulings, all Americans have an individual right to marriage.

Since we have an individual right to marriage, the State can only restrict that right by establishing a clear State interest that restricting that right accomplishes.
States have not been able to establish how treating same gender couples exactly the same as opposite gender couples accomplishes any clear State interest.

And that is why the States keep losing in court.

 

Nobody did claim that. The reality is that homosexuality is natural n

 

It never ceases to amaze me that you continue with this lie after having it debunked over and over and over again tex.

 

Gays are desperate to excuse their behavior. What has for many centuries been deviant behavior punishable by death might now be genetic.... what a windfall for them.

Keep dreaming. A large percentage of gay males are gay because that is the only lifestyle that allows so much sex without effort.

 

Bovine excrement! The only people who are desperate are the bigots who are futilely trying to hold back the tied of gay rights and their acceptance into the mainstream of society. You are just one more troll who wants to make homosexuality just about sex. Go crawl back under the bridge and come out when you have something intelligent to say with regard to the OP

 

Ah I love it when the old folks look back with fondness on the old days......

 

Old days? Try anal sex in Islamic crapholes and report back.

 

The article you posted seems to indicate that it's a genetic mutation. Would that be like Downs Syndrome or Muscular Dystrophy?