Man Charged Over Murder Of Daniel Morcombe

Discussion in 'Australia, NZ, Pacific' started by Makedde, Aug 13, 2011.

  1. AllEvil

    AllEvil Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    It was probably an Ad Hominem, though.
     
  2. Panzerkampfwagen

    Panzerkampfwagen New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2010
    Messages:
    11,570
    Likes Received:
    152
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Considering his posting since it may well have been but wasn't a logical fallacy.
     
  3. AllEvil

    AllEvil Active Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2009
    Messages:
    2,564
    Likes Received:
    19
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Oh no, it certainly seems true enough :D
     
  4. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    He is correct, though. Having the death penalty for rape will mean more victims are killed because the victim can't identify you, and the perp hasn't lost anything.
     
  5. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    but if the penalty for the rape was death there would be LESS of it.
     
  6. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not so. We already know that in the US, states with the death penalty have a higher murder rate than those without. The death penalty doesn't deter.
     
  7. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You cant use the US as your example. The crime rate there has a different cause than here. Also if you take out the blacks shooting each other over drugs ect the murder rate wouldnt be so bad.
     
  8. baralaba

    baralaba New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not sure If I'm answering the right question here. Still learning this internet stuff. My answer is to the person who asks why we shouldn't just kill them right out (I'm assuming he means after they're found guilty). Ignoring the official reason, what about this: What if we've got the wrong guy? You don't really have to look too far back to know that happens (too often). Cool down. He has not been convicted yet. In any case death is too easy. The rest of his life in solitary (and as a peadophile it will be), if you think about it, will be a far worse sentence
     
  9. garry17

    garry17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    4,126
    Likes Received:
    176
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Finally they seem to have found his remains. This will be good for the family but will it help a conviction? After the amount of time that has passed, the case becomes very hard for prosecution. Let us all hope justice is done.
     
  10. Makedde

    Makedde New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    66,166
    Likes Received:
    349
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah, that is a problem. Unless they can link this guy to the crime then they can't expect a conviction. They really need to find something airtight.
     

Share This Page