Discussion in 'Warfare / Military' started by waltky, Mar 6, 2017.
Really? How many exactly? Are they all military? Can you prove it? Just a few logical questions.
Yes, and all that without their knowledge and consent. Did the FBI arrest the beasts?
Nose art seems to have been a U.S. Army thing, not so much a Navy or Marine Corps thing. But even Marine helicopters had nose art during and after the Vietnam War
The Army Air Forces, 8th Air Force allowed nose art on it's aircraft during WW ll where most of the other Army Air Forces had regulations against nose art but those regulations were rarely enforced.
Even Army tanks and even trucks had nose art even during the Vietnam War like the Army's gun trucks.
When I was "in-country" (69-70) every soldier and Marine had at least one Playboy centerfold displayed in their hootch. If they didn't an investigation would have been launched by CID, is their a gay serving in Vietnam ?
Uncle Ferd don't mind a lil' cheesecake now an' then...
Marine Corps' Nude-Photo-Sharing Scandal Worse Than First Realized
10 Mar 2017 | Hundreds of nude photos of female service members from every branch have been posted to a message board that dates back to May.
Marines May Offer Reputation Software to Victims of Photo Scandal
10 Mar 2017 | The Marine Corps may offer reputation management tools to victims of a group that shared nude photos of female service members.
Uncle Ferd been huntin' it onna interweb, but he can't find it...
Scandal that rocked Marine Corps now expands, four branches of military investigating similar claims
Saturday 11th March, 2017 - Merely days after the U.S. Defense Department said it was investigating a report that some Marines shared naked photographs of female Marines, veterans and other women on a secret Facebook page called "Marines United" - four more branches are said to be probing similar claims.
I agree - the purpose of the military is to fight, not to get caught up in social drama.
SOMETIMES the old ways are best. They were the result of centuries of looking at what generates success. Along comes a generation that thinks they somehow know better, and want to change everything to "new" thinking (like back where we were in the beginning of the world). It's all socially motivated, and there is no evidence that it generates SUCCESS.
I still think separation of sexes is best and would cut back on many problems; leaving women free to achieve excellence without always looking back over their shoulder or being distracted. Same holds true for the men.
There is science regarding education that women in all female academies perform at much higher standards than women in co-educational schools. I'm sure the same would apply to the military.
When I served, GI's continually "hazed" each other. It wasn't limited to "'cruits" or "newbs". Sometimes it was harsh, but it's a part of military culture. Toughen up.
I don't see what the big PC fuss is all about.
Boy did you miss the point!
Dat's what Uncle Ferd tells his womens...
Top Marine Asks Women to 'Trust Us' in Nude Photo Inquiry
11 Mar 2017 | Nude photos of women Marines and other women were shared on the Facebook page, "Marines United."
I got the point. But women in the military is a fact of life today. LGBT service troubles me more than women. The propaganda gold mine cross-dressers represent is tragic IMO. My point, is that if your so emotionally fragile, that naked pics cause distress, your hardly soldier material. Time to grow a pair, and man up! ... ladies.
Nobody with the IQ of a clever chimpanzee really believed that anything put on the internet was private even before Snowden. After Snowden even the dumbest chimps knew that much.
If someone stole your identity and posted your personal information online, would you not get the Big PC fuss then?
Those servicemembers get harmed because neanderthals whose attitudes are more like yours can't handle serving with "skirts" or "coloreds".
I sort of disagree. It's no secret the Army was forcing women into roles that have standards. Ranger Regiment for instance. I heard through many sources at Fort Benning that those girls got MUTLIPLE attempts at A and R to pass, because senior leadership wanted a few women rangers. In RASP and Ranger School, you get ONE attempt and you're not told if you pass until the end. I have a lot of friends in the regiment who have some strong feelings toward this social experiment.
Here's my issue. The women in the military should have the exact same physical standards for any combat MOS. No special treatment, no separate quarters...all the same.
I witnessed with my own eyes, females being given stress cards when they did their AIT for 31B.
According to the liberals state legislatures in California, identity theft isn't a crime unless your white.
WW ll in the Pacific:
The U.S. Navy just announced that all skirts will be phased out. The problem was you had transgenders, one was wearing a skirt and an other TG wearing trousers. There had to be uniformity. So no more skirts. Not even female sailors will be allowed to wear skirts to appease the TG's in the Navy.
But the scuttlebutt is, the drag queens aren't happy campers with the new uniform.
Why should military uniforms have skirts to begin with?
Back before there was PC social engineering in the military we had women serving in the WAC's, WAVES, Women Marines Reserves , WAF's and SPARS. Women wore skirts because they weren't trying to be men.
It was a different time back then, back when America was still great. The U.S. military was in the war fighting business not in the social engineering business.
What does "trying to be men" have to do with servicemembers wearing pants? Are you contending pants are only for men?
Back when America was great and gays got locked in prisons or mental hospitals and marital rape was legal and the "coloreds" had seperate facilities, right?
Not where I lived, gays got rolled and "colors" had a prosperous black owned business district on Central Avenue until some Alinskyite community organizers agitated the colors and they burnt down their own neighborhood in 1965.
I don't freaking believe it.
Right now I'm watching C-Span 2 and the Senate Armed Service Committee is holding hearings on naked girls in particular naked women Marines on social media.
Sen. McCain just asked the Commandant of the Marines what in the UCMJ can be used ?
Answer...CATCH-22 Article 134.
Well, the actions of these Marines pretty perfectly meets the definition of being harmful to good order and discipline.
What military did you serve in ?
Pictures of naked girls use to be a morale booster that increased unit cohesion that led to good order and discipline.
The evidence is in, using the military for PC social engineering causes soldiers, Marines, sailors and airmen to bleed and die and is harmful to good order and discipline.
On post #41 I posted on the internet three pictures of naked soldiers and Marines taking showers butt naked during WW ll, Korea and the Vietnam War. These photos have been published in magazines, books and all over the internet. Did the liberals hold any Congressional hearings ???
While watching the Senate Armed Services Committee's hearings yesterday after Gen. Robert Neller was done answering Sen. McCaine's questions it was the liberals turn and you would have thought a capital crime had been committed . These snowflake Senators were calling for general court-martials after Gen. Neller just got done telling the committee that as far as punishment could go would be nothing more than "standing before the man" using the CATCH-22 of the UCMJ, Article 134 and resulting in a NJP.
Maybe these PC female naked Marines weren't instructed on CATCH-22 Article 134 of the UCMJ ...? You don't have any freaking PC rights in the military.
I try to read Gen. Neller's face yesterday and what I see "Why in the **** am I doing here on the Hill ? ... I and the Marine Corps are in the war fighting business ... not the PC social engineering business."
What were these PC liberal snowflakes thinking when they put women along side of men who are in the business of breaking things and killing people ?
How are female Marines supposed to trust and work with their male counterparts when they are being disrespected and objectivized like this?
If these were military personnel sharing other private info about soldiers like their SSN's against those soldiers' will would you be calling the outrage "PC"?
Separate names with a comma.