Megyn Kelly Is Said to Be Leaving Fox News for NBC

Do FumFux Faux Fox Network is not a news source it is an opinion source. It itvwasca news source you woukd not lice it so much. Fox telks youbeant you want to hear notvwhat you need to hear.

 

Surprise surprise.

More work for less pay? Sounds like Megyn was also reading between the lines when Rupert Murdoch mentioned the deep talent bench that would give their right arm for her job. See, I told you so.

Edit: Not you guavaball, but the people that thought I was wrong about her leaving Fox all those months ago.

 

Good. I'm glad to see her leave since the people who loved her six months ago now hate her and say hateful things about her because she dared to challenge Trump.

 

More like it will be funny to see the conservatives suddenly hate her. People who aren't conservatives hate Fox news and their agenda of propaganda and lies, no matter who is pushing it. My guess is that she got sick of being forced to push a twisted right wing agenda of distortion, and would rather work for an honest and credible news organization, where she can speak say what needs to be said, without considering corporate agenda, be that conservative or liberal or moderate positions.

Funny watching all the conservatives turn on her already.

 

What difference does a reporters leaning matter? They are to report.
Oh, not on faux.

 

So you think reporters should be biased also?

 

Yeah. And ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and MSNBC never do that.

Unless they are sending their stories to the Hillary campaign first to proofread which they caught red handed doing.

Enjoy your hypocrisy.

 

Personally I like Trish Regan

 

It makes a difference when it effects what they report. Megyn is not a straight news reporter she is a cross between that and an opinion guy like Hannity. Look at the NYT biased reporting if there ever was such a thing

She announced on her show tonight that she is leaving at the end of the week. She almost teared up

 

But, but, but, Fox News is "Fair and Balanced"! There are no partisan hacks working there.

 

To be fair, MSNBC's slogan is "Lean Forward", not "Fair and Balanced". And, as such aren't hiding their partisanship. Unlike Fox, who pretends that they're actually non-partisan.

Enjoy your hypocrisy.

 

How would you know. You've never read a newspaper in your life!

 

The DNC does not run the New York Times. That's an idiotic claim that you can't back up.

You have no idea what the Times actually said about the Sri Lankan civil war. I doubt that you could find Sri Lanka on a map.

Obama's past was a settled matter before he even ran for President. Folks like you want to believe otherwise, but you can't document that either.

My challenge included the requirement that you document your claims. You upped the ante on baseless and ridculous and documented nothing.

Typical Trumpster shuffle. All rants, No facts.

 

Maybe the poignant memories keeps on haunting her if she stays there.

 

To be quite honest, she's no Jeff Gannon, that's for sure...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeff_Gannon

 

It will be easier to avoid her on NBC which I don't watch anyway. I imagine she'll disappear from my consciousness rather quickly.

 

Keep your head in that bubble then...

Only watch and read content that conforms to your world view.

That way you can entirely avoid the cognitive dissonance that comes with having your little bubble shattered by watching someone that puts forth an opinion contrary to your own.

 

Ironic coming from a Trump supporter given that he has all of those attributes in spades.

 

I'm not sure you realize the irony of your comment. You are aware that pretty much 99.99% of NBC was sure Hilla was going to win, and like many of the left-of-center on this forum, blindly believed the polls and were convinced the Hillary Landslide™ was imminent. Of course, several of those Hill-Bots are no longer with us. *shrugs*

Heck, just look at how Hollywood felt - and there were some MSNBC personnel there.

I'd say most if not all people in the media live in a bubble. More so than your typical poster on PF.com where all of us interact with people we disagree with all the time.

 

For all intents and purposes, the NYT might as well be an arm of the DNC. I mean, when was the last time they endorsed a GOP candidate for prez - 1956 and Eisenhower. They routinely play up liberal causes and downplay conservative ones.

See, the issue isn't that the DNC runs the NYT. It's worse than that - the NYT willingly supports the DNC agenda. The DNC doesn't have to do a thing; they already have the support of the NYT. In many ways, the NYT is pretty dishonest about their bias. Mother Jones as an example proudly admits its bias. It's honest about it. MJ has far more integrity than the NYT does.

 

I just not grew up during the Cold War but Uncle Sam sent me to that part of the world to north of Ceylon to meet interesting people and kill them.

Ceylon was an UK commie problem and not sure if it was a SEATO problem .

A lot of commie (*)(*)(*)(*) took place after WW ll, hundreds of thousands would be killed in the name of PC political correctness

 

And that's more than they're worth.

 

NBC?





So basically she's going to fall off the earth?

 

"NEWS" was always a capitalistic venture. Read a book once in a while, you may actually learn something.