MLK Jr Watched as a Friend Raped a Woman and Encouraged the Attack

Well hell. you certainly made it sound OK, to do it

 

PF, a constant treasure trove of satire, inspiration and morality abound!!!!

 

¯\_(º¸º)_/¯ GOOD QUESTION!

 

Well that certainly explains Post #2

 

CITE THIS:
The source were Sally's children who looked just like their Daddy---Thomas Jefferson.
Thomas Jefferson: Sally is that my baby?
Sally: Yes, Massa Jefferson, this is yours. See the red hair.
Thomas Jefferson: I sure do like your chocolate, Sally.

There. I cited it for you.

 

In other words you have no proof or even evidence. Just something to feed your hatred of slaveowners.

 

That part was TRUE.

 

Don't hold your breath.

MLK is worshiped by the selectively offended and chronically outraged for what they think he was, not for what he actually was.

 

Prove it.

 

The left position when it's club involvement.. Cut their balls off if it GOP rumors

 

See Post #2

 

If it were indeed the truth, such could actually be proven on the part of yourself, and would have been proven by now. Merely claiming something is the truth is not good enough. It is no different than a black individual claiming they did not do anything wrong while they are being arrested for a felony offense.

 

I knew!

 

Thomas Jefferson was the ONLY WHITE MAN who had access to Sally in the 9 month period of time before each baby was born.
Does that narrow it down?
Sally was living in France with Jefferson the first time she was impregnated, at 14 years old. He was the only White man who had access to her at that time also.

 

Be patient, there will be more treasures

 

I thought I cited that pretty good. Darn!

 

You're dealing with the protection of black illusions here. Even the MLK memorial foundation now admits to the facts-

* His doctoral dissertation was plagiarized, which under normal university standards would mean he would be ejected with out the degree.
* His "I have a dream" speech was stolen from anther minister.
* He had staff find him women for drunken/drug sex parties on the road, usually multiple women, and he frequently enjoyed beating hell out of them.

That's why no statues of him are being torn down, no parks or highways being renamed. Those values fit right in with those of the BLM people.

I wonder how long the honorable black citizens will tolerate this- because they stand to lose everything they have worked for and deserve.

The trash blacks are saying every cop as a bad cop, because he's a cop. That is exactly like seeing every black as a bad black, because they are black. Pretty much the core nature of racism.
In terms of the potential violence, skin color will become a uniform just like a cop's uniform, and a way of identifying an enemy.
NO rational person, no sane person, regardless of race, wants that to happen.

I believe that BLM does, and have no doubt of it. They don't seek justice- and they aren't helping anyone, especially black people.

 

Another interesting fact: Sally Hemings was actually the half sister of Jefferson's deceased wife, Martha. Sally and Martha had the same White father. Of course, Sally's Mom was an enslaved African woman. Look it up.

 

Oh my.

 

Although I do enjoy history lessons be they true of fictional,
The topic is MLK jr. not Thomas Jefferson.

 

The claim on the part of yourself was that so-called "mulatto babies" are evidence that Thomas Jefferson committed rape, as it was a statement issued in a general sense to suggest such children, regardless of parentage, were evidence enough of the claim against Thomas Jefferson. The original claim on the part of yourself had absolutely nothing to do with this one particular individual. The only way the original position on the part of yourself can be supported by fact is if one of the two above scenarios is confirmed as fact. So which scenario is being claimed as fact on the part of yourself?

That matter aside, the entire argument against Thomas Jefferson that is being presented on the part of yourself, is a weak attempt to explain why certain accused rapists should be supported and celebrated, while other rapists are condemned. Either rape is unacceptable under all circumstances, or it is acceptable under certain circumstances. Which standard is it? Are you willing to condemn Martin Luther King Jr. as readily as you do Thomas Jefferson? Or do you claim the woman that was raped ultimately deserved what she got?

 

There were no white men living in France back then? Wow! I think you've made a major discovery!!!

 

I know. I'm a naughty girl.

 

I think raping a slave is especially egregious. Don't you?

 

I'm sure there were many White men living in France back then. But, Sally was under the watchful eye of Mr Jefferson. Do you honestly think a 40 something man was going to let his 14 year old beautiful plaything get near another man? Perish the thought!